newyorker4ever wrote:[img][/img]
the way it should be
Moderators: HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi
jermsknicks wrote:F N 11 wrote:god shammgod wrote:
Let the kid go somewhere where he can be a ball mover and great defender. People don’t appreciate him here. I see his impact but all people see is scoring. It will be a huge mistake.
Then all we will hear is knicks defense this Knicks defense that.
Appreciate? He wasn't on the court long enough last year to appreciate. It was a big problem we had to throw Mudiay and Allen out there instead of him. It was like everyone was developing around him while he sat. He had the one good game vs the Warriors and fans were expecting more after that.
I don't want to lose him for nothing, but let's not act like he earned any minutes off of last year's season.
Is anyone against him playing in the summer league again? He should be headed back if he stays on our roster.
SelbyCobra wrote:Just looking through the results and their odds again. While the Knicks were unquestionably lucky not to fall out of the top-3 on draft night, there has rightfully been a lot of focus on how long the odds were for NOP, MEM, and LAL to end up as fortunate as they did.
NOP had a 6.0% chance of picking 1st
MEM had a 6.3% chance of picking 2nd
LAL had a 2.8% chance of picking 4th
But on the flip side...
ATL had an 8.8% chance of picking 8th. The Hawks found their franchise guy in Young and entered the lottery with a 42% chance at the top 4 to really jumpstart the franchise, and it was 90%+ that they'd be in the top 7...and they ended up 8th. Oof.
WSH had a 3.8% chance of picking 9th. Wiz are maybe the most crippled franchise out there with the devastating Wall injury/contract. A lottery win could shave years off the work to dig out from the mess, and they had roughly the same odds of getting a top 4 pick that the Knicks did of landing top 3...and ended up 9th. Just soul-crushing for them.
whocares1 wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:So, let's talk a bit about RJ, in terms of his projection and some perceived or real flaws.
I'm not going to go into every perceived flaw - that his shooting could be better or decision making or going right, but one specific area/s.
So, something of a knock on RJ is he's more straight line athleticism who lacks wiggle, which would keep him from being elite and the straight line athleticism would be more easily countered at the NBA level. I'd assume for now I THINK it could be added that if his jumper is inconsistent, teams would also play off him, so that's an extra step for the defender to counter that athleticism, plus the obvious that there are more tall, fast, strong guys in the NBA.
As an aside, while I see that lack of wiggle that Spencer and others have referred to, as well as being shot happy at times, one video pointed out that RJ has a really good, long 2nd stride he uses creatively, with explosion, with a euro step. I think that move alone bodes well he's not busting at the NBA level, along with being 6'7" and really athletic and a decent all around game. I get the arguments over how high his potential, ceiling vs floor etc, but not a bust. That's crazy talk.
Anyway, here's the question to those good amateur scouts on here and people with a better long term memory about player attributes:
"Have any low wiggle, straight line scoring wing ever had a very good NBA career? I guess we can narrow it to guards, as I figure RJ would play the 2 on the Knicks"
"Has any low wiggle player developed it after a few years? By the time a guy reaches the NBA, even if as young as 18/19, is that more good court vision - either you have it by now or you don't"
Just a little discussion around RJ, with the assumption the Knicks draft him and don't trade him away - which I have no idea what happens, and would be happy with the right kind of AD trade and happy without AD
I can’t think of any “low wiggle” players that have succeeded unless they added something to their game like a long range shot or some isolation dribble moves to create space. He will benefit from the increased pace + his reputation for going to rim will get him some whistles.
Polk377 wrote:Knick4Real wrote:Polk377 wrote:
Depends on how you look at. Most years RJ would be the grand prize. This kid is exceptionally talented. His game will translate better to the NBA, especially if he has shooters around him spacing the floor which Duke severely lacked with Cam bricking everything.We are doing just fine.
You're missing the point.
Again, I'm not doubting the players. I'm only saying KNICKS fans are not clowns for being disappointed they didn't get the #1 pick -- WHOEVER that player turns out to be.
Its fine to be disappointed but taking it to the level guys like Stephen A Smith have been is ridiculous. The way this lottery turned out, we are lucky to have the 3rd pick.
Worst_to_First wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Worst_to_First wrote:
Earlier in the season I couldn’t bring myself to get enamored with Culver as I believe lower ranked guys like KPJr and Langford were the ones with abilities that could translate to the NBA.
Culver’s lack of burst on top of his inconsistent shooting worries me in terms of his potential to be a great player in the league.
Culver reminds me of Frank. I would not trade down for him. I’ll be pretty mad if we did.
How do you feel about RJ still? He is growing on me a little bit. He is still a very flawed player but I am starting to see some star potential in him. His FIBA tape makes him look like a god
Have been spending the last couple of days trying to acclimatize myself to RJ. LOL it is easier to do so than when we drafted Frank over DSJ wherein I went into full delusion mode and convinced myself that Frank gives me Kawhi vibes.
RJ is a great player and I saw how he dominated in FIBA in giving Canada that gold medal in the under-19 world tournament. That guy has that drive and a winner’s mentality.
The challenge with me is that I still approach things as if we are still in rebuild mode. Hard to predict things with uncertainties surrounding KD and Kyrie and I still think they end up elsewhere (I think Mills already knows what’s up).
So for me DSJ is still in the roster and I am not optimistic of his fit with RJ. Both guys are more effective with the ball in their hands given their scoring and playmaking skills and would benefit from having as much shooters around them as possible.
Aside from potentially jersey number complications LOL I think their overlapping strengths and lack of complementary skills for each other could be a problem in terms of maximizing the lineup on the floor.
Needless to say I like DSJ but if RJ is our guy moving forward we may have to find a different PG to pair up with him. If we are sticking with DSJ I won’t mind trading down this draft in exchange for a better position to get the top prospects in the 2020 draft class.
mpharris36 wrote:Wololo wrote:I'd probably take the same kind of offer Atlanta took from Dallas last year:
2019 #3 for 2019 #5 plus 2020 1st Top 5 protected / 2021 1st unprotected
Doubt Cavs would offer that.
like i said all you need is one team to be in love with RJ and they would give up a lot.
thebuzzardman wrote:So, let's talk a bit about RJ, in terms of his projection and some perceived or real flaws.
I'm not going to go into every perceived flaw - that his shooting could be better or decision making or going right, but one specific area/s.
So, something of a knock on RJ is he's more straight line athleticism who lacks wiggle, which would keep him from being elite and the straight line athleticism would be more easily countered at the NBA level. I'd assume for now I THINK it could be added that if his jumper is inconsistent, teams would also play off him, so that's an extra step for the defender to counter that athleticism, plus the obvious that there are more tall, fast, strong guys in the NBA.
As an aside, while I see that lack of wiggle that Spencer and others have referred to, as well as being shot happy at times, one video pointed out that RJ has a really good, long 2nd stride he uses creatively, with explosion, with a euro step. I think that move alone bodes well he's not busting at the NBA level, along with being 6'7" and really athletic and a decent all around game. I get the arguments over how high his potential, ceiling vs floor etc, but not a bust. That's crazy talk.
Anyway, here's the question to those good amateur scouts on here and people with a better long term memory about player attributes:
"Have any low wiggle, straight line scoring wing ever had a very good NBA career? I guess we can narrow it to guards, as I figure RJ would play the 2 on the Knicks"
"Has any low wiggle player developed it after a few years? By the time a guy reaches the NBA, even if as young as 18/19, is that more good court vision - either you have it by now or you don't"
Just a little discussion around RJ, with the assumption the Knicks draft him and don't trade him away - which I have no idea what happens, and would be happy with the right kind of AD trade and happy without AD
"Quicker defenders can give him problems because he is generally a straight-line player and struggles going side-to-side," the report noted. "At the next level, Leonard can be a 4/3 on offense, but on defense he may be inclined to guarding 3s because of his lack of lateral quickness."
2010 wrote:The more I deep dive into RJ's video footage, the more I realize it wouldn't be the smart move to bet against him. Dude has the potential to be a triple-double threat on any given night.
F N 11 wrote:Lol just read an article Cavs would trade 5 and 26 for 3. Not nearly enough...
2010 wrote:The more I deep dive into RJ's video footage, the more I realize it wouldn't be the smart move to bet against him. Dude has the potential to be a triple-double threat on any given night.
Worst_to_First wrote:WargamesX wrote:Worst_to_First wrote:
I think with the way the lottery played out Cam can be there at 8 if he is ranked last among fellow wings like Hunter and Culver and if the top 3 PGs all go in front of him.
I think with the way the lottery played out there is a chance Cam could fall to 8. It depends on how he stacks against his fellow wings like Hunter and Culver and if the 3 top PG’s in the draft go in front of him.
I think based on his ability shining the most in workouts and his potential some team will take him before 8. You are right he's going to have to show out compared to his fellow players.
I forgot that Brandon Clarke at the 6th pick to Phoenix is a possibility as well.
Richard4444 wrote:Worst_to_First wrote:WargamesX wrote:
I think based on his ability shining the most in workouts and his potential some team will take him before 8. You are right he's going to have to show out compared to his fellow players.
I forgot that Brandon Clarke at the 6th pick to Phoenix is a possibility as well.
Good Thinking. They really need a PF. They can think its more easy to trade for a PG and rookies PG usually takes more time to develop.
F N 11 wrote:Lol just read an article Cavs would trade 5 and 26 for 3. Not nearly enough...