FlatearthZorro wrote:Revived wrote:FlatearthZorro wrote:
If Irving was coming back, we might've done the deal, too, imo. But without Irving and AD wanting to be in LA, I'd say giving up 3-4 picks and Tatum would probably set us back 7-8 years. If we don't win a title, Davis is gone, if we do win a title it's possible Davis leaves, too....
If AD is in a Celtics jersey before Kyrie hits free agency (July) then I doubt Kyrie even thinks about going anywhere else. It might be a short term deal but he would likely still come back.
You don't understand what I wrote. Irving is not coming even prime MJ was here. He 100% has verbal agreement with the Nets. Do you really think that Danny didn't at least contact him and tell him he's willing to trade most if not all of our assets for AD if Irving comes back? I mean that's silly to think. Ainge leaves no stone un-turned. I think Ainge and Wyc have known that Irving is leaving regardless of what we do for a while now.
IMHO the presence of Kyrie was not going to convince Ainge to come close to the Lakers offer. I think the Celtics 100% recognized Kyrie Irving's presence guarantees nothing with AD.
AD just walked out on his friend Holiday despite Zion being added to the Pelicans. Still friends with Holiday but left for greener pastures.
Kyrie may have had to have been Michael Jordan to convince AD to stay with the Celtics. I am not blaming you for this but I see some fans blaming Kyrie for AD. If anything I thank Kyrie if he had any role in Celtics not overpaying for an AD rental. I think Irving had nothing to do with it since Lakers blew all reasonable Celtics offers out of the water.
Given AD's own injury history combined with an aging Lebron, Pelicans got a great haul under the circumstances. Sure they would rather have AD over the next 8 years but given he was probably leaving after next year, great haul by their new gm.













