KGdaBom wrote:Loyal[]Wolf wrote:Neeva wrote:Am I the only one happy not to lose culver/okogie AND overpay dlo?
You're probably in the 10 percentile.
Many of us weren't willing to give up Culver for the privilege of overpaying Russell.
Count me in this category too. I like D'Lo as much as anyone but I'm really curious about Culver's do-all ability and how it would fit here.
If there's any major sting from today, it's that the possibility of a Wiggins trade, however small, was on the horizon.
Weird that the Warriors would pay the max for a player who might end up as a one-year replacement for Klay when they have to worry about paying Klay and Green, but I'm guessing they know what they're doing.

















