Trade for Westbrook?
Moderators: Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites, dVs33
Re: Trade for Westbrook?
- ComboGuardCity
- RealGM
- Posts: 26,052
- And1: 4,940
- Joined: Jul 10, 2010
Re: Trade for Westbrook?
I want this to happen. GMs are overthinking. At the very least we have about the same talent as 2018 OKC in a much weaker conference. That makes a contender in the East.
Re: Trade for Westbrook?
- zeebneeb
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,830
- And1: 13,465
- Joined: Jun 30, 2003
- Location: ANGERVILLE: Population 1
-
Re: Trade for Westbrook?
I'll say this, if we do trade drummond in this deal for westbrook, Adam's absolutely has to come back as well.
Westbrook
Kennard
Draft pick
Blake
Adam's
Is still a damn good team. I'll be upset, but scew it I guess. I'm that tired of reggie, and I want to win damn it.
Westbrook
Kennard
Draft pick
Blake
Adam's
Is still a damn good team. I'll be upset, but scew it I guess. I'm that tired of reggie, and I want to win damn it.
Re: Trade for Westbrook?
- Context
- RealGM
- Posts: 32,707
- And1: 22,044
- Joined: Jul 06, 2005
- Location: where the Gods dwell! shhhhhhh
-
Re: Trade for Westbrook?
Snakebites wrote:It pains me to say that Russ just isn’t worth anything close to his salary. Pains me because I really like(d) him as a player and was one of his last defenders.
He’s flashy and a big name but he’ll never be the star of a contending team. The playoffs this year was a final thesis on that. I’d be really upset if we gave up a lot of future assets for him. We’d be a worse version of the Thunder from last year. Russ plus bad shooting is a bad look.
And I feel for Russ. I really do. It’s just not a good idea. That deal tops 40 million the year after next and stays there until a year after Blake expires.
you're over thinking it...what are we all doing for the next (kawhi,lebron, Curry or Giannis) 5 years? nothing...and by that time his contract will be over...as long as you don't give up the next generational talent its win win...Westbrook will bring excitement and you know what -he may even grow up after seeing star after star leave him and finally look in the mirror...If I'm 10 teams in the league I trade for him with out a thought...

Luka | Scotty |Dunn
Bane | Pritchard | Branham
Watson | Jmac | *
AD | Jaylin | Clarke
Chet | Edey | Neemias
Re: Trade for Westbrook?
-
Neptune
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,725
- And1: 1,400
- Joined: Jan 30, 2014
Re: Trade for Westbrook?
I'm over here refreshing every minute again. Lol!
Re: Trade for Westbrook?
-
Canadafan
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,159
- And1: 2,040
- Joined: Nov 03, 2014
-
Re: Trade for Westbrook?
sfballa13 wrote:MotownMadness wrote:sfballa13 wrote:I dont get why everyone is pooping on this deal
Reggie barely played and when he did we werent that good
Honestly i hope we get rid of Drummond for Adams, Drummond will require a big deal and Adams is much tougher and doesnt sulk like Andre
Adams is also usually right up there with Dre on ORB% too while seeming like a smarter player
Exactly and much more mentally tough as well
Drummond is too concerned with getting his own and becoming a star and household name, we dont need that in our locker room or on a Pistons team
Westbrook and Adams embody the Pistons going to work attitude and toughness
So true. I'm kinda pumped for this now. Would love if we could keep Luke and Snell. I know they're nothing incredible but they are probably penciled in as our starters and will spread the floor beautifully for WB and BG.
Can it be done though?
Re: Trade for Westbrook?
-
flow
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,730
- And1: 2,896
- Joined: Feb 18, 2016
Re: Trade for Westbrook?
Westbrook is basically RJ on crack.
Re: Trade for Westbrook?
-
Spider156
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,614
- And1: 1,425
- Joined: Jul 25, 2010
-
Re: Trade for Westbrook?
Here's the deal guys
Rockets can't make a trade for Westbrook. It's too tough. OKC doesn't want Paul's contract
OKC doesn't want players back, they want picks so we have more to offer than the Heat. Also The Thunder own 2 of Miami's picks, why would they want them to get better? Makes no sense
Wolves are centering their trade around Wiggins who's under contract for 4 years like Westbrook and extremely overpaid. It's just not gonna happen for Wiggins.
I'm reading that Westbrook wants Adams to get out of the team with him.
Pistons can make the best offer with picks and can trade Dre for Adams, so:
Reggie Jackson, Drummond, Snell plus Kennard/Pick
For
Westbrook and Adams
Only question I believe we are trying to answer is how many picks and young guys? Doumbouya will not be involved as he cannot be traded for at least 30 days. I get the feeling it is Kennard plus a pick, 2 max. Likely one of them being Top 5 protected
Rockets can't make a trade for Westbrook. It's too tough. OKC doesn't want Paul's contract
OKC doesn't want players back, they want picks so we have more to offer than the Heat. Also The Thunder own 2 of Miami's picks, why would they want them to get better? Makes no sense
Wolves are centering their trade around Wiggins who's under contract for 4 years like Westbrook and extremely overpaid. It's just not gonna happen for Wiggins.
I'm reading that Westbrook wants Adams to get out of the team with him.
Pistons can make the best offer with picks and can trade Dre for Adams, so:
Reggie Jackson, Drummond, Snell plus Kennard/Pick
For
Westbrook and Adams
Only question I believe we are trying to answer is how many picks and young guys? Doumbouya will not be involved as he cannot be traded for at least 30 days. I get the feeling it is Kennard plus a pick, 2 max. Likely one of them being Top 5 protected
Defense wins championships
Re: Trade for Westbrook?
-
tmorgan
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,933
- And1: 10,645
- Joined: Feb 04, 2005
- Location: San Francisco, CA
-
Re: Trade for Westbrook?
Even if we get RW for nothing but a couple bums and a couple picks, I'd pass. When the best shooter of your three best players is Blake Griffin, you aren't winning anything. The East is weak overall, but Philly and Milwaukee are way better than the trio we'd have.
Re: Trade for Westbrook?
-
ven412
- Starter
- Posts: 2,013
- And1: 40
- Joined: Jul 12, 2002
- Location: Abandon Ship
- Contact:
Re: Trade for Westbrook?
A Drummond + RJ + 1rp + expiring for Westbrook and filler is good in my book. For WB and Adams we robbed them.
Re: Trade for Westbrook?
-
flow
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,730
- And1: 2,896
- Joined: Feb 18, 2016
Re: Trade for Westbrook?
I would pass on the deal if 1st's are involved, including this year's. Westbrook's a fantastic individual regular season stat player, but he's not a winner. He doesn't play winning playoff basketball. He's not worth mortgaging the future of this team even further than it's already been mortgaged. His addition doesn't make this team a contender.
Re: Trade for Westbrook?
-
Neptune
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,725
- And1: 1,400
- Joined: Jan 30, 2014
Re: Trade for Westbrook?
ven412 wrote:A Drummond + RJ + 1rp + expiring for Westbrook and filler is good in my book. For WB and Adams we robbed them.
We're not trading Drummond
Re: Trade for Westbrook?
- ComboGuardCity
- RealGM
- Posts: 26,052
- And1: 4,940
- Joined: Jul 10, 2010
Re: Trade for Westbrook?
I don’t think we can trade snell for 45 more days right?
Re: Trade for Westbrook?
-
rmfc
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,918
- And1: 936
- Joined: Jul 19, 2009
-
Re: Trade for Westbrook?
Guys, any chance we hear good news tonight??
Re: Trade for Westbrook?
-
MotownMadness
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,851
- And1: 22,916
- Joined: Oct 08, 2013
-
Re: Trade for Westbrook?
rmfc wrote:Guys, any chance we hear good news tonight??
Probably not for days. Im sure both sides are gomna take their time seeing offers. Then again there might not be many offers besides us and Miami so who knows
Re: Trade for Westbrook?
-
MotownMadness
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,851
- And1: 22,916
- Joined: Oct 08, 2013
-
Re: Trade for Westbrook?
Steve Kyler
For what it’s worth, doesn’t look like Orlando has much interest in a Russell Westbrook deal - you never say never - but not something they are exploring.
39
6:08 PM - Jul 7, 2019
Re: Trade for Westbrook?
-
vic
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,619
- And1: 1,101
- Joined: Dec 27, 2012
Re: Trade for Westbrook?
Stop mortgaging the future. #1 sign of a dumb team is mortgaging the future to sign players that won't get you a chance at a championship. RWB is a fun to watch player but with his huge, 4 year contract and declining athleticism you'd better GET (not give) at least 2 first rounders for him. Smart FO's don't give up future assets for Albatross contracts. Blake isn't bringing you a chip. RWB isn't bringing you a chip!
Blake + CP3 = no chips.
RWB + Harden + KD + Ibaka = no chips.
RWB + PG = No chips.
How is RWB + Blake going to lead to a championships? That's just putting 2 guys together that can't win championships with players better than them.
Blake + CP3 = no chips.
RWB + Harden + KD + Ibaka = no chips.
RWB + PG = No chips.
How is RWB + Blake going to lead to a championships? That's just putting 2 guys together that can't win championships with players better than them.
You need 2-way wings, 2-way shooting bigs, and you can't allow low iq players on the court. Assist/turnover ratio is crucial. Shooting point guards are icing on the cake IF they are plus defenders.
Weaver & Casey, govern yourselves accordingly!
Weaver & Casey, govern yourselves accordingly!
Re: Trade for Westbrook?
-
mattao313
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,587
- And1: 4,464
- Joined: Aug 29, 2014
-
Re: Trade for Westbrook?
vic wrote:Stop mortgaging the future. #1 sign of a dumb team is mortgaging the future to sign players that won't get you a chance at a championship. RWB is a fun to watch player but with his huge, 4 year contract and declining athleticism you'd better GET (not give) at least 2 first rounders for him. Smart FO's don't give up future assets for Albatross contracts. Blake isn't bringing you a chip. RWB isn't bringing you a chip!
Blake + CP3 = no chips.
RWB + Harden + KD + Ibaka = no chips.
RWB + PG = No chips.
How is RWB + Blake going to lead to a championships? That's just putting 2 guys together that can't win championships with players better than them.
Im not agianst a rebuild but its not a sure thing with trying to build though the draft. We could easly end up like the Suns, Orlando, or even Minny. You try to get players like WB Blake in the draft. Why wait 4 years from now when you could potentially get this season?
Championships
Re: Trade for Westbrook?
-
Liqourish
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,912
- And1: 2,245
- Joined: Oct 03, 2005
-
Re: Trade for Westbrook?
vic wrote:Stop mortgaging the future. #1 sign of a dumb team is mortgaging the future to sign players that won't get you a chance at a championship. RWB is a fun to watch player but with his huge, 4 year contract and declining athleticism you'd better GET (not give) at least 2 first rounders for him. Smart FO's don't give up future assets for Albatross contracts. Blake isn't bringing you a chip. RWB isn't bringing you a chip!
Blake + CP3 = no chips.
RWB + Harden + KD + Ibaka = no chips.
RWB + PG = No chips.
How is RWB + Blake going to lead to a championships? That's just putting 2 guys together that can't win championships with players better than them.
We aren’t winning a championship anyway. Why not enjoy watching the team anyway?
Re: Trade for Westbrook?
-
GreenTeamah
- Ballboy
- Posts: 41
- And1: 15
- Joined: Jun 28, 2019
-
Re: Trade for Westbrook?
If y’all could make this trade they should try to figure out a way to get Marc Gasol in some 3 way deal with a team that would want Drummond, Miami rings a bell and I know Charlotte was interested, I’m pretty sure Toronto will try to flip him as long as a team makes it worth their while, but Gasol would be such a good fit with Blake and Russ y’all would have to be taken serious as a legit threat to come out the east
Re: Trade for Westbrook?
-
hoophabit
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,700
- And1: 1,421
- Joined: Jan 19, 2002
-
Re: Trade for Westbrook?
Liqourish wrote:vic wrote:Stop mortgaging the future. #1 sign of a dumb team is mortgaging the future to sign players that won't get you a chance at a championship. RWB is a fun to watch player but with his huge, 4 year contract and declining athleticism you'd better GET (not give) at least 2 first rounders for him. Smart FO's don't give up future assets for Albatross contracts. Blake isn't bringing you a chip. RWB isn't bringing you a chip!
Blake + CP3 = no chips.
RWB + Harden + KD + Ibaka = no chips.
RWB + PG = No chips.
How is RWB + Blake going to lead to a championships? That's just putting 2 guys together that can't win championships with players better than them.
We aren’t winning a championship anyway. Why not enjoy watching the team anyway?
Vic, well said sir.
Liqourish, I understand the impulse but the Dubs and Raptors? I'm recalling that was once considered a pipedream too.
RWB appears a declining physical talent who doesn't have much of a shot to fall back on. Several quality players didn't appear to like to play with him. He's hella expensive. Pro or con, you have to admit it's risky?





