zeebneeb wrote:How does it help if he can only be traded by himself? Foesnt that make the proposed deal impossible?Kilo wrote:CubicalLake7 wrote:JE3 responded to a tweet of mine. Clarification regarding Snell.
?s=19
Can be traded by himself I believe, not part of a package. But also he was traded "last season" - so that might impact the ability to trade him sooner if they can.
If we trade him though - we have dick all at SF.
As it is we'll need to go dumpster diving for vet minimum depth if we do a 3-4 for one deal. We're also hard capped because we used the non-tax payer MLE to sign Rose. We either can't go over the tax or just the tax apron, the former would be a killer, the latter gives us some breathing room.
It doesn't. But I'm not clear if Edwards was just correcting that Snell COULD be traded now vs could be traded in the example deal. Traded players can't be flipped in a package for x-number of days, the Dec 15th date restriction is for free agents signed during the off-season.
















