Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks (NO TPE)
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks (NO TPE)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,448
- And1: 10,031
- Joined: May 12, 2002
Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks (NO TPE)
Honest question, why do people pay attention to/follow Eric Nehm?
Please reconsider your animal consumption.
Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks (NO TPE)
- Swan Vox
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,927
- And1: 2,917
- Joined: Aug 01, 2009
- Location: DILLIGAF
Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks (NO TPE)
DavidDunn21 wrote:
Nice tribute. I hope we are able to weather the absence of the president. I know he was hurt at various times, but I thought for sure he’d be a core guy on an eventual championship team. Pretty sad that it worked out this way. Malcolm seemed to be in that Billups, Horry, Fischer mold of dudes that just got it done. Hail to The Chief.
Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks (NO TPE)
- buckboy
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,523
- And1: 7,903
- Joined: Nov 05, 2004
- Location: At the Gettin' Place
Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks (NO TPE)
rilamann wrote:I value Brogdon because I value consistency and dependability.
Yeah, this makes no sense. Brogdon is about the furthest thing from dependable.
"This is my home, this is my city...I'm blessed to be a part of the Milwaukee Bucks for the next 5 years. Let's make these years count. The show goes on, let's get it."
Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks (NO TPE)
- buckboy
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,523
- And1: 7,903
- Joined: Nov 05, 2004
- Location: At the Gettin' Place
Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks (NO TPE)
leroyjw10 wrote:Bucksfan28 wrote:DingleJerry wrote:But of everyone on the team last year if the ball was getting swung around the perimeter down 2 with under 40 seconds left who would you prefer ended up with the open 3? I know I'd take Brogdon and I wouldn't think twice.
I think that point is at least debatable, Mids has made some clutch threes for the Bucks. I could support either one taking the shot.
But even if that's a point you're completely unwilling to concede on, that one thing does not validate the claim.
Brogdon's clutch stats were through the roof last year, with ridiculous 65/75/100 splits during the last five minutes of a 5-point game. Middleton, on the other hand, "boasted" 35/37/87 splits.
Those numbers are so incredible that it almost seems like they rely on a small sample size.
"This is my home, this is my city...I'm blessed to be a part of the Milwaukee Bucks for the next 5 years. Let's make these years count. The show goes on, let's get it."
Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks (NO TPE)
- emunney
- RealGM
- Posts: 60,213
- And1: 36,740
- Joined: Feb 22, 2005
- Location: where takes go to be pampered
Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks (NO TPE)
One might even suspect most of Middleton's clutch shots were 3s.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks (NO TPE)
- emunney
- RealGM
- Posts: 60,213
- And1: 36,740
- Joined: Feb 22, 2005
- Location: where takes go to be pampered
Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks (NO TPE)
There's no denying (and why would you want to?) that Brogdon has made a lot of plays for us in tight games the last 3 years. He's a GOOD PLAYER.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks (NO TPE)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,592
- And1: 8,163
- Joined: Jul 09, 2015
Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks (NO TPE)
Well whoever dug that up could probably easily grab the last three years as well. He's a good shooter and always seems calm and all I was saying is that he's the guy on the team I'd most trust in those situations. It is what it is, it's just one positive for him in the overall equation.
Resident Lillard truther since 2015.
Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks (NO TPE)
- buckboy
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,523
- And1: 7,903
- Joined: Nov 05, 2004
- Location: At the Gettin' Place
Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks (NO TPE)
emunney wrote:There's no denying (and why would you want to?) that Brogdon has made a lot of plays for us in tight games the last 3 years. He's a GOOD PLAYER.
Yep. But reliable, not really, just in terms of availability.
"This is my home, this is my city...I'm blessed to be a part of the Milwaukee Bucks for the next 5 years. Let's make these years count. The show goes on, let's get it."
Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks (NO TPE)
- blazza18
- RealGM
- Posts: 53,436
- And1: 26,625
- Joined: Dec 02, 2010
Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks (NO TPE)
midranger wrote:Honest question, why do people pay attention to/follow Eric Nehm?
Maybe because he's one of 2 or 3 media members who regularly "report" on the team?
Baddy Chuck wrote:I want to win but I also love chaos.
Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks (NO TPE)
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 110,876
- And1: 26,395
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks (NO TPE)
midranger wrote:Honest question, why do people pay attention to/follow Eric Nehm?
It's weird. I got a subscription to The Athletic because they were offering a 50% discount and I mainly just wanted to read national guys like Stark, Rosenthal, Posnanski, LeBrun, Custance and Deitsch. So I get the subscription and I rarely read the national writers and I just don't read the local stuff at all. I have push notifications for score updates and stuff but when an article comes up from one of the local guys, I just get rid of it. They don't say anything that I don't already know and I very rarely read the national writers anymore either.
Just a total garbage website imo and their chats have possibly the worst format in the history of chat formats. If I ever got signed out of the app, I wouldn't even be able to access it anymore because I have no idea what my password is and it's not worth my time to make a new one.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks (NO TPE)
- Wooderson
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,569
- And1: 5,298
- Joined: Mar 03, 2008
Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks (NO TPE)
GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:as a role playing shooter im more interested in wes Matthews clutch stats now.
It's not pretty over the last 3 years. 10 points per 36 with a 43.6% TS and shooting splits of 30/27/70, in 364 total minutes. 75% of his looks were 3s over that time.
Probably just a sample size thing like most clutch numbers (and possibly shot quality on lesser teams). Prior to 2017 he was at 16 points per 36, 58.8% TS, splits of 40/36/83 in 948 minutes. 63% of his shots were 3s. 2016 post Achilles injury he was very good as well.
Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks (NO TPE)
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,315
- And1: 1,882
- Joined: Nov 23, 2013
Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks (NO TPE)
Daver wrote:JR smith will be waived any interest in him over korver or will smith follow lebrons stench all the way lala land
Definitely have way more interest in Korver still. At least at minimum, he has a brain.
Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks (NO TPE)
- M-C-G
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,875
- And1: 9,371
- Joined: Jan 13, 2013
Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks (NO TPE)
I still think the Brogdon thing worked out about as well as humanly possible for him, us and Pacers. The caveat being we didn’t get the TPE because of who knows.
Great for a second round pick to make this jump. Great for us not to have a large four year commitment to a guy that couldn’t stay healthy even though he was one of my favorite players. I get being scared off a four year deal with him. I also think he is going to struggle in the larger role he was seeking but wish him well.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Great for a second round pick to make this jump. Great for us not to have a large four year commitment to a guy that couldn’t stay healthy even though he was one of my favorite players. I get being scared off a four year deal with him. I also think he is going to struggle in the larger role he was seeking but wish him well.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks (NO TPE)
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,494
- And1: 2,542
- Joined: Feb 18, 2012
Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks (NO TPE)
midranger wrote:Honest question, why do people pay attention to/follow Eric Nehm?
I like the IDEA of an outsider covering the Bucks (i.e. Kane Pitman) but you know if an outsider was critical of the Bucks or tried to do any actual reporting they'd lose access immediately.
Same goes for the Brewers. Haudricourt and McCalvy are miserable. Possibly even worse than Nehm and Valesquez.
Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks (NO TPE)
- Rockmaninoff
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,650
- And1: 1,667
- Joined: Jan 11, 2008
Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks (NO TPE)
Dante should have no problem filling the oft-injured, above average SG role. With better defense too.
MilBucksBackOnTop06 wrote:The fight for civil rights just like for liberty and justice and peace won't be won by man. It will take a god...so lets move on to sports.
Magic Giannison wrote:Giannis is god but even god's cannot save our **** team.
Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks (NO TPE)
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,072
- And1: 2,949
- Joined: Jul 08, 2018
Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks (NO TPE)
Rockmaninoff wrote:Dante should have no problem filling the oft-injured, above average SG role. With better defense too.
lol.. i've been pretty supportive of trading Brogdon but that's a bit optimistic. He first needs to prove that he can stay healthy himself, which remains to be seen. He also needs to prove he can shoot consistently. He looked better in those four games that he played when trying to come back but overall it wasn't very good in that department. I think he has a lot of potential to be a solid, high energy player for us, but it's far from a sure thing.
I said this the other day, and because i'm a narcissist i'll post it again: If either DJ or DDV pops for us and becomes starter caliber, it's going to be massive. Would be nice if it's DDV because we need shooting and athleticism, plus he's under team control for longer, but either will be great. I would imagine the plan is to give them both every opportunity to prove themselves.
Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks (NO TPE)
- crkone
- RealGM
- Posts: 28,574
- And1: 9,331
- Joined: Aug 16, 2006
Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks (NO TPE)
Same with the Packers. It's funny how the most scathing stuff now comes out after the writers move on from the Green Bay beat. Beat writing is different from opinion based writing. They need to keep that access to have a job.kid idioteque wrote:midranger wrote:Honest question, why do people pay attention to/follow Eric Nehm?
I like the IDEA of an outsider covering the Bucks (i.e. Kane Pitman) but you know if an outsider was critical of the Bucks or tried to do any actual reporting they'd lose access immediately.
Same goes for the Brewers. Haudricourt and McCalvy are miserable. Possibly even worse than Nehm and Valesquez.
Code: Select all
o- - - \o __|
o/ /| vv`\
/| | |
| / \_ |
/ \ | |
/ | |
Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks (NO TPE)
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 47,909
- And1: 11,579
- Joined: Jul 17, 2001
Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks (NO TPE)
soxperry wrote:Rockmaninoff wrote:Dante should have no problem filling the oft-injured, above average SG role. With better defense too.
lol.. i've been pretty supportive of trading Brogdon but that's a bit optimistic. He first needs to prove that he can stay healthy himself, which remains to be seen. He also needs to prove he can shoot consistently. He looked better in those four games that he played when trying to come back but overall it wasn't very good in that department. I think he has a lot of potential to be a solid, high energy player for us, but it's far from a sure thing.
I said this the other day, and because i'm a narcissist i'll post it again: If either DJ or DDV pops for us and becomes starter caliber, it's going to be massive. Would be nice if it's DDV because we need shooting and athleticism, plus he's under team control for longer, but either will be great. I would imagine the plan is to give them both every opportunity to prove themselves.
Yeah, I'd call DDV the more "oft-injured" of the 2. I've never heard of a young guard being out so long with a heal injury. Supposedly he's healthy but still couldn't go in the SL? What's up with that? I don't see him being more than a poor man's Brogdon, but Bucks need him to become a rotation player this season.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks (NO TPE)
- Rockmaninoff
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,650
- And1: 1,667
- Joined: Jan 11, 2008
Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks (NO TPE)
I was being a little facetious with the oft-injured bit.Ruzious wrote:soxperry wrote:Rockmaninoff wrote:Dante should have no problem filling the oft-injured, above average SG role. With better defense too.
lol.. i've been pretty supportive of trading Brogdon but that's a bit optimistic. He first needs to prove that he can stay healthy himself, which remains to be seen. He also needs to prove he can shoot consistently. He looked better in those four games that he played when trying to come back but overall it wasn't very good in that department. I think he has a lot of potential to be a solid, high energy player for us, but it's far from a sure thing.
I said this the other day, and because i'm a narcissist i'll post it again: If either DJ or DDV pops for us and becomes starter caliber, it's going to be massive. Would be nice if it's DDV because we need shooting and athleticism, plus he's under team control for longer, but either will be great. I would imagine the plan is to give them both every opportunity to prove themselves.
Yeah, I'd call DDV the more "oft-injured" of the 2. I've never heard of a young guard being out so long with a heal injury. Supposedly he's healthy but still couldn't go in the SL? What's up with that? I don't see him being more than a poor man's Brogdon, but Bucks need him to become a rotation player this season.
I do think the Bucks are pretty high on Donte. Bud had him as the 6th man to start last season. Pretty good for a rookie.
They might have him penciled in as the starting 2 this year, so holding him out of summer league as an injury precaution makes some sense.
I think the Brogdon transaction was mostly a financial move, but the loss is easier to take when considering Donte's upside.
MilBucksBackOnTop06 wrote:The fight for civil rights just like for liberty and justice and peace won't be won by man. It will take a god...so lets move on to sports.
Magic Giannison wrote:Giannis is god but even god's cannot save our **** team.
Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks (NO TPE)
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 47,909
- And1: 11,579
- Joined: Jul 17, 2001
Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks (NO TPE)
Rockmaninoff wrote:I was being a little facetious with the oft-injured bit.Ruzious wrote:soxperry wrote:
lol.. i've been pretty supportive of trading Brogdon but that's a bit optimistic. He first needs to prove that he can stay healthy himself, which remains to be seen. He also needs to prove he can shoot consistently. He looked better in those four games that he played when trying to come back but overall it wasn't very good in that department. I think he has a lot of potential to be a solid, high energy player for us, but it's far from a sure thing.
I said this the other day, and because i'm a narcissist i'll post it again: If either DJ or DDV pops for us and becomes starter caliber, it's going to be massive. Would be nice if it's DDV because we need shooting and athleticism, plus he's under team control for longer, but either will be great. I would imagine the plan is to give them both every opportunity to prove themselves.
Yeah, I'd call DDV the more "oft-injured" of the 2. I've never heard of a young guard being out so long with a heal injury. Supposedly he's healthy but still couldn't go in the SL? What's up with that? I don't see him being more than a poor man's Brogdon, but Bucks need him to become a rotation player this season.
I do think the Bucks are pretty high on Donte. Bud had him as the 6th man to start last season. Pretty good for a rookie.
They might have him penciled in as the starting 2 this year, so holding him out of summer league as an injury precaution makes some sense.
I think the Brogdon transaction was mostly a financial move, but the loss is easier to take when considering Donte's upside.
Not until DDV actually shows he can play - which he really didn't do last season. We don't want to be playing Wes Matthews 25 plus minutes a game, and Sterling Brown just isn't good enough - and probably should lose some weight (as Colson should), and we need Hill to backup the point. DDV's got to start making 3's - this season. Otherwise, Bucks need to shop midseason for a 2.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams