Same here. I think I'm going to take a break from this place and just come back in October for pre-season unless something major happens.
Official Speculation Thread ‘19-'20 II: BIG as F
Moderators: Def Swami, Howard Mass, ChosenSavior, UCF, Knightro, UCFJayBird
Re: Official Speculation Thread ‘19-'20 II: BIG as F
-
NotACat
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,690
- And1: 1,354
- Joined: Apr 28, 2018
-
Re: Official Speculation Thread ‘19-'20 II: BIG as F
Same here. I think I'm going to take a break from this place and just come back in October for pre-season unless something major happens.
Re: Official Speculation Thread ‘19-'20 II: BIG as F
- Audi
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,948
- And1: 3,244
- Joined: May 30, 2014
-
Re: Official Speculation Thread ‘19-'20 II: BIG as F
NotACat wrote:
Same here. I think I'm going to take a break from this place and just come back in October for pre-season unless something major happens.
..meh. I'll take all of it over this place being a ghost town.
Abra Cadabra, Razzmatazz, Slam-Dunk Sesame, Hocus Pocus, Alacazam, Gonna set the spirit free
Keeping The Original Orlando Magic Theme Song Alive since 2009
Keeping The Original Orlando Magic Theme Song Alive since 2009
Spoiler:
Re: Official Speculation Thread ‘19-'20 II: BIG as F
-
Magic_Johnny12
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,498
- And1: 10,081
- Joined: Sep 27, 2013
- Contact:
-
Re: Official Speculation Thread ‘19-'20 II: BIG as F
Ducklett wrote:Magic_Johnny12 wrote:Ducklett wrote:
If you can get Lonnie Walker for that, I would. The Jrue and McCollum trades would be very, very horrible.
Horrible for who?
The Lonnie Walker trade makes complete sense and reminds me of the JJ for Harris trade. Trading things we don't really need (Birch) or value much (SRPs) for a guy we could shape and mold into a player for our system. I legitimately think if Lonnie Walker was on our team, he would compete and maybe even beat Evan for the starting SG role in the next 2 years (assuming we were to keep Evan long term). Guy is young and does a lot of the right things and Pop seems to love him.
What I don't understand is trading for Jrue Holiday, who's efficiency and stats are nearly identical to DJ's, but he shoots literally 10 percentage points worse from 3 (Jrue 32.% vs DJ 42.1%), and CJ McCollum, who gets nearly the same amount of points per FGA that AG does and you are trading them, but does literally nothing on the defensive end that AG does. Not to mention you are sacrificing the chemistry and cohesiveness that our front office just spent all free agency talking about being the important thing this off season and blowing up both our depth and future for two guys who are not even close to bringing us a championship.
So defense means nothing to you? Got it.
Re: Official Speculation Thread ‘19-'20 II: BIG as F
-
ezzzp
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,425
- And1: 3,462
- Joined: Aug 25, 2009
-
Re: Official Speculation Thread ‘19-'20 II: BIG as F
thelead wrote:Nyce_1 wrote:Hinkie didn't die for Colangelo and Brand to misuse the trove of assets he acquired.drsd wrote:Now that the Sixers has three Max players, we can see where "The Process" led to. Apparently it includes paying 10 guys the min to be able to set a roster.
Quoted to emphasize the truth. Hinkie, who acquired the stars, was forced out by the nba and replaced by an idiot who trash talked amd attacked his own players on social media![]()
Then, that guy was replaced by a new GM who has no idea what he’s doing and basically traded all of Hinkie’s assets for overpriced surrounding pieces to the stars Hinkie drafted.
Don’t play dumb. ‘The process’ was terminated by the NBA before the plan could be fully realized.
It’s the equivalent of developing a new controversial surgical procedure to cure a disease and then getting fired half way through the first trial surgery, being replaced by two incompetent doctors that do not follow your procedure and butcher the job. Is it fair to blame the original doctor for his ‘failed idea’?
We’ll never know if Hinkie would have stayed put, drafted Tatum, then used the pick Colangelo traded for Fultz on another quality player. The truth is, the process was shut down before it had a chance to be fully realized.
Hinkie never showed ANY signs of being able to construct a team, much less a winning product.
Bottoming out, cashing out any remotely decent player for picks, and then firing buckshot at the draft was the easy part. It doesn't take any skill to lose-on-purpose and trade away everything for any pick available.
In reality, he wasted most of those picks and he lost most player-for-player trades.
Even the two draft picks that salvaged what was a disaster, Embiid (health) and Simmons (shooting), both have major flaws that thus far have been key problems in the playoffs.
Embiid's health in particular is a ticking time bomb waiting to go off at any moment. His back, knee and feet problems didn't just miraculously disappear - they have just been "managed." Would you bet your house that over his max contract (next 4 years) as he gets older and the minutes start to add up that's going to hold? I definitely would not.
Re: Official Speculation Thread ‘19-'20 II: BIG as F
- Blue_and_Whte
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,678
- And1: 9,568
- Joined: Jun 26, 2009
- Location: Orlando, FL.
-
Re: Official Speculation Thread ‘19-'20 II: BIG as F
This is the time of year I go back and look st old spec threads and it usually doesn’t disappoint.
viewtopic.php?f=25&t=1774898&start=1320
viewtopic.php?f=25&t=1774898&start=1320
Faith, Family, & Orlando Magic
#2A
#Adopt
#MAGA
#2A
#Adopt
#MAGA
Re: Official Speculation Thread ‘19-'20 II: BIG as F
- Ducklett
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,105
- And1: 5,528
- Joined: Jul 17, 2012
-
Re: Official Speculation Thread ‘19-'20 II: BIG as F
Magic_Johnny12 wrote:Ducklett wrote:Magic_Johnny12 wrote:
Horrible for who?
The Lonnie Walker trade makes complete sense and reminds me of the JJ for Harris trade. Trading things we don't really need (Birch) or value much (SRPs) for a guy we could shape and mold into a player for our system. I legitimately think if Lonnie Walker was on our team, he would compete and maybe even beat Evan for the starting SG role in the next 2 years (assuming we were to keep Evan long term). Guy is young and does a lot of the right things and Pop seems to love him.
What I don't understand is trading for Jrue Holiday, who's efficiency and stats are nearly identical to DJ's, but he shoots literally 10 percentage points worse from 3 (Jrue 32.% vs DJ 42.1%), and CJ McCollum, who gets nearly the same amount of points per FGA that AG does and you are trading them, but does literally nothing on the defensive end that AG does. Not to mention you are sacrificing the chemistry and cohesiveness that our front office just spent all free agency talking about being the important thing this off season and blowing up both our depth and future for two guys who are not even close to bringing us a championship.
So defense means nothing to you? Got it.
We were a top 10 defensive team last year. We have defensive specialists all over our roster, including one at PG. I think if you were to poll the board, you would find that everyone thinks we need more shooting. Why would you bring it a guy that barely shoots the 3 better than Elfrid in at the position where 3 point shooting is literally critical.
Re: Official Speculation Thread ‘19-'20 II: BIG as F
-
ezzzp
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,425
- And1: 3,462
- Joined: Aug 25, 2009
-
Re: Official Speculation Thread ‘19-'20 II: BIG as F
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2020-nba-predictions/
• FiveThirtyEight's ELO 2020 Projection:
Team / Projected Record / Chance of Playoffs
1 Toronto / 58-24 / 99%
2 Milwaukee / 55-27 / 97%
3 Philadelphia / 49-33 / 88%
4 Boston / 49-33 / 88%
5 Orlando / 45-37 / 76%
6 Indiana / 42-40 / 64%
7 Miami / 41-41 / 58%
8 Brooklyn / 40-42 / 56%
• FiveThirtyEight's CARMELO 2020 Projection:
Team / Projected Record / Chance of Playoffs
1 Philadelphia / 59-23 /99%
2 Milwaukee / 54-28 / 99%
3 Boston / 46-36 / 91%
4 Toronto / 45-37 / 89%
5 Miami / 44-38 / 86%
6 Orlando / 42-40 / 76%
7 Indiana / 39-43 / 64%
8 Brooklyn / 38-44 / 56%
• FiveThirtyEight's ELO 2020 Projection:
Team / Projected Record / Chance of Playoffs
1 Toronto / 58-24 / 99%
2 Milwaukee / 55-27 / 97%
3 Philadelphia / 49-33 / 88%
4 Boston / 49-33 / 88%
5 Orlando / 45-37 / 76%
6 Indiana / 42-40 / 64%
7 Miami / 41-41 / 58%
8 Brooklyn / 40-42 / 56%
• FiveThirtyEight's CARMELO 2020 Projection:
Team / Projected Record / Chance of Playoffs
1 Philadelphia / 59-23 /99%
2 Milwaukee / 54-28 / 99%
3 Boston / 46-36 / 91%
4 Toronto / 45-37 / 89%
5 Miami / 44-38 / 86%
6 Orlando / 42-40 / 76%
7 Indiana / 39-43 / 64%
8 Brooklyn / 38-44 / 56%
Re: Official Speculation Thread ‘19-'20 II: BIG as F
-
ezzzp
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,425
- And1: 3,462
- Joined: Aug 25, 2009
-
Re: Official Speculation Thread ‘19-'20 II: BIG as F
- SOUL
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 59,256
- And1: 41,019
- Joined: Dec 11, 2006
- Location: Orl★ndo
-
Re: Official Speculation Thread ‘19-'20 II: BIG as F
www.rareslums.com // please support my writing!
Re: Official Speculation Thread ‘19-'20 II: BIG as F
-
cedric76
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,258
- And1: 3,727
- Joined: May 28, 2005
Re: Official Speculation Thread ‘19-'20 II: BIG as F
ezzzp wrote:https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2020-nba-predictions/
• FiveThirtyEight's ELO 2020 Projection:
Team / Projected Record / Chance of Playoffs
1 Toronto / 58-24 / 99%
2 Milwaukee / 55-27 / 97%
3 Philadelphia / 49-33 / 88%
4 Boston / 49-33 / 88%
5 Orlando / [b]45-36 / 76%[/b]
6 Indiana / 42-40 / 64%
7 Miami / 41-41 / 58%
8 Brooklyn / 40-42 / 56%
• FiveThirtyEight's CARMELO 2020 Projection:
Team / Projected Record / Chance of Playoffs
1 Philadelphia / 59-23 /99%
2 Milwaukee / 54-28 / 99%
3 Boston / 46-36 / 91%
4 Toronto / 45-37 / 89%
5 Miami / 44-38 / 86%
6 Orlando / 42-40 / 76%
7 Indiana / 39-43 / 64%
8 Brooklyn / 38-44 / 56%
Only playing 81 games next seasons, nice
Suggs, AB, Tyus, Jase
Bane, AB, TDS , Jett
Franz, TDS, Panda
P5, JI, Panda, Moe
Wcj, Goga, Moe
Bane, AB, TDS , Jett
Franz, TDS, Panda
P5, JI, Panda, Moe
Wcj, Goga, Moe
Re: Official Speculation Thread ‘19-'20 II: BIG as F
- drsd
- RealGM
- Posts: 39,243
- And1: 8,967
- Joined: Mar 16, 2003
-
Re: Official Speculation Thread ‘19-'20 II: BIG as F
ezzzp wrote:• FiveThirtyEight's CARMELO 2020 Projection:
Team / Projected Record / Chance of Playoffs
1 Philadelphia / 59-23 /99%
2 Milwaukee / 54-28 / 99%
3 Boston / 46-36 / 91%
4 Toronto / 45-37 / 89%
5 Miami / 44-38 / 86%
6 Orlando / 42-40 / 76%
7 Indiana / 39-43 / 64%
8 Brooklyn / 38-44 / 56%
Interesting looking at the team link:
CARMELO LINK for Magic
Notably this:

Spoiler:
..
Re: Official Speculation Thread ‘19-'20 II: BIG as F
-
Tarheel
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,837
- And1: 832
- Joined: Jul 18, 2004
- Location: UK
-
Re: Official Speculation Thread ‘19-'20 II: BIG as F
drsd wrote:ezzzp wrote:• FiveThirtyEight's CARMELO 2020 Projection:
Team / Projected Record / Chance of Playoffs
1 Philadelphia / 59-23 /99%
2 Milwaukee / 54-28 / 99%
3 Boston / 46-36 / 91%
4 Toronto / 45-37 / 89%
5 Miami / 44-38 / 86%
6 Orlando / 42-40 / 76%
7 Indiana / 39-43 / 64%
8 Brooklyn / 38-44 / 56%
Interesting looking at the team link:
CARMELO LINK for Magic
Notably this:Spoiler:
..
Also interesting that only Vuc and AG are positives on both ends of the floor.
Re: Official Speculation Thread ‘19-'20 II: BIG as F
-
pepe1991
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,365
- And1: 19,459
- Joined: Jan 10, 2016
-
Re: Official Speculation Thread ‘19-'20 II: BIG as F
Tarheel wrote:drsd wrote:ezzzp wrote:• FiveThirtyEight's CARMELO 2020 Projection:
Team / Projected Record / Chance of Playoffs
1 Philadelphia / 59-23 /99%
2 Milwaukee / 54-28 / 99%
3 Boston / 46-36 / 91%
4 Toronto / 45-37 / 89%
5 Miami / 44-38 / 86%
6 Orlando / 42-40 / 76%
7 Indiana / 39-43 / 64%
8 Brooklyn / 38-44 / 56%
Interesting looking at the team link:
CARMELO LINK for Magic
Notably this:Spoiler:
..
Also interesting that only Vuc and AG are positives on both ends of the floor.
And that's no suprise at all
Life is what happens when you're busy making other plans. -John Lennon
Re: Official Speculation Thread ‘19-'20 II: BIG as F
-
Tarheel
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,837
- And1: 832
- Joined: Jul 18, 2004
- Location: UK
-
Re: Official Speculation Thread ‘19-'20 II: BIG as F
pepe1991 wrote:Tarheel wrote:
Also interesting that only Vuc and AG are positives on both ends of the floor.
And that's no suprise at all
I was a little surprised that T-Ross wasn't a plus defender, but that was about it
Re: Official Speculation Thread ‘19-'20 II: BIG as F
-
pepe1991
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,365
- And1: 19,459
- Joined: Jan 10, 2016
-
Re: Official Speculation Thread ‘19-'20 II: BIG as F
Tarheel wrote:pepe1991 wrote:Tarheel wrote:
Also interesting that only Vuc and AG are positives on both ends of the floor.
And that's no suprise at all
I was a little surprised that T-Ross wasn't a plus defender, but that was about it
Most guards come off as negative defenders in defensive metrics because they are "fall" guys for all perimeter shots, and today teams shoot 3s all the time.
it's more suprising when you see bigs who are negative defenders. Takes extra sucking to get there.
Life is what happens when you're busy making other plans. -John Lennon
Re: Official Speculation Thread ‘19-'20 II: BIG as F
- D J C
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 795
- And1: 521
- Joined: Feb 27, 2007
Re: Official Speculation Thread ‘19-'20 II: BIG as F
drsd wrote:ezzzp wrote:• FiveThirtyEight's CARMELO 2020 Projection:
Team / Projected Record / Chance of Playoffs
1 Philadelphia / 59-23 /99%
2 Milwaukee / 54-28 / 99%
3 Boston / 46-36 / 91%
4 Toronto / 45-37 / 89%
5 Miami / 44-38 / 86%
6 Orlando / 42-40 / 76%
7 Indiana / 39-43 / 64%
8 Brooklyn / 38-44 / 56%
Interesting looking at the team link:
CARMELO LINK for Magic
Notably this:Spoiler:Spoiler:
..
Interesting that we're projected at 42 wins assuming that Vucevic falls from a +2.6 on offense to +.7, Jonathan Isaac somehow gets worse on offense, Aminu goes from a +.5 on offense last year to a -.5 on offense, Ross falls back down to earth on offense, Fournier has an even worse year than his 'off year'... so pretty much this is a worst case scenario (given everyone stays healthy).
Curious to see what the model would show if Isaac made the leap to a net positive offensive player, Vucevic continued his All Star play, Evan bounced back, and/or the bench improved from last year. Probably good for a few more wins and in the range Toronto is projected at?
Re: Official Speculation Thread ‘19-'20 II: BIG as F
- Blue_and_Whte
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,678
- And1: 9,568
- Joined: Jun 26, 2009
- Location: Orlando, FL.
-
Re: Official Speculation Thread ‘19-'20 II: BIG as F
D J C wrote:drsd wrote:ezzzp wrote:• FiveThirtyEight's CARMELO 2020 Projection:
Team / Projected Record / Chance of Playoffs
1 Philadelphia / 59-23 /99%
2 Milwaukee / 54-28 / 99%
3 Boston / 46-36 / 91%
4 Toronto / 45-37 / 89%
5 Miami / 44-38 / 86%
6 Orlando / 42-40 / 76%
7 Indiana / 39-43 / 64%
8 Brooklyn / 38-44 / 56%
Interesting looking at the team link:
CARMELO LINK for Magic
Notably this:Spoiler:Spoiler:
..
Interesting that we're projected at 42 wins assuming that Vucevic falls from a +2.6 on offense to +.7, Jonathan Isaac somehow gets worse on offense, Aminu goes from a +.5 on offense last year to a -.5 on offense, Ross falls back down to earth on offense, Fournier has an even worse year than his 'off year'... so pretty much this is a worst case scenario (given everyone stays healthy).
Curious to see what the model would show if Isaac made the leap to a net positive offensive player, Vucevic continued his All Star play, Evan bounced back, and/or the bench improved from last year. Probably good for a few more wins and in the range Toronto is projected at?
Imo in the end it’ll be
Orlando
Miami
Toronto
Faith, Family, & Orlando Magic
#2A
#Adopt
#MAGA
#2A
#Adopt
#MAGA
Re: Official Speculation Thread ‘19-'20 II: BIG as F
- Xatticus
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,795
- And1: 8,287
- Joined: Feb 18, 2016
- Location: the land of the blind
-
Re: Official Speculation Thread ‘19-'20 II: BIG as F
pepe1991 wrote:Tarheel wrote:pepe1991 wrote:
And that's no suprise at all
I was a little surprised that T-Ross wasn't a plus defender, but that was about it
Most guards come off as negative defenders in defensive metrics because they are "fall" guys for all perimeter shots, and today teams shoot 3s all the time.
it's more suprising when you see bigs who are negative defenders. Takes extra sucking to get there.
And it's pretty much impossible to have a poor rating by any of these defensive composites if you have relatively high rebound or block percentages. We know that you can be a terrible defender and a good rebounder or shot blocker, but the composites will tell you otherwise because they just don't have much else to work with. This is why someone like Bamba can grade out positively as a defender, even though he was miserable at that end in his rookie season.
"Xatticus has always been, in my humble opinion best poster here. Should write articles or something."
-pepe1991
-pepe1991
Re: Official Speculation Thread ‘19-'20 II: BIG as F
-
pepe1991
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,365
- And1: 19,459
- Joined: Jan 10, 2016
-
Re: Official Speculation Thread ‘19-'20 II: BIG as F
Xatticus wrote:pepe1991 wrote:Tarheel wrote:
I was a little surprised that T-Ross wasn't a plus defender, but that was about it
Most guards come off as negative defenders in defensive metrics because they are "fall" guys for all perimeter shots, and today teams shoot 3s all the time.
it's more suprising when you see bigs who are negative defenders. Takes extra sucking to get there.
And it's pretty much impossible to have a poor rating by any of these defensive composites if you have relatively high rebound or block percentages. We know that you can be a terrible defender and a good rebounder or shot blocker, but the composites will tell you otherwise because they just don't have much else to work with. This is why someone like Bamba can grade out positively as a defender, even though he was miserable at that end in his rookie season.
Indeed.
I always use late years of Marcus Camby as overrated defense.
Guy was elite blocker, but his defense more often than not was him leaving his man wide open to overplay weak side to close down on slashing guard. If guard passes to his man, his man will have open dunk, but if not, he'll get block or rebound.
Ibaka used to do that a lot as well. But before decline he was able to defend on switch, but much like it's case with lot of bigs, his athletic prime was early and he declined after age of 25

Life is what happens when you're busy making other plans. -John Lennon
Re: Official Speculation Thread ‘19-'20 II: BIG as F
-
ezzzp
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,425
- And1: 3,462
- Joined: Aug 25, 2009
-
Re: Official Speculation Thread ‘19-'20 II: BIG as F
cedric76 wrote:Only playing 81 games next seasons, nice
its my typo ... 45-37 is what it should have said










