leolozon wrote:BoogieTime wrote:leolozon wrote:
To be fair, the premise wasn't the same. It was best players in 5 years, so it included a lot of guys who are over 23 right now and even guys still not drafted (Wiseman #1 prospect next year). If you get rid of those, I think Bagley was 19th and Fox 8th. Still low for Bagley IMO, but Bagley is probably not going to be at his peak in 5 years, so the two lists ranked them closer than you think.
For example, this list thinks that Bagley is going to be a better player than Markkanen, M. Turner, D. Russell and J. Murray. The other list thinks that those 4 guys, at 27-28 years old, will be better than 25 years old Bagley. The two things can be true and actually make sense as most players peak around 28.
This list is way better though. I think some guys should go down/up a couple of spots, but I don't think there's anything dumb.
Bro we saw a different list. Somehow, Bagley was in the late 30s.. I mean, what the hell was that?
No we didn't see a different list. Like I said, the other list was best player in 5 years (in 2024-2025 and nothing else), not best player 23 and under. I think Bagley is probably going to be the 35-20th player in 5 years, but he wasn't listed 39th compared to 11th here, considering in the other list he was in competition with guys like Giannis, Jokic, Harden, Curry, etc. Plus guys who will be in their prime in 5 years, even though they will probably have a worst career than him.
You just can't directly compare the two rankings. Fox was basically considered about the same in both lists if you only look at players 23 and under (8th vs 6th).
Well, in any event, even if they weren’t the same exact listings, this is a lot more respectful to Bagley. Anyone who has Gary Harris and Co. ahead of Marvin I collectively put on my garbage list, which is nbcsports