ImageImage

Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

User avatar
dedned
Analyst
Posts: 3,737
And1: 1,480
Joined: Feb 02, 2005
Location: nowhere
       

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#661 » by dedned » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:39 am

He blasted the **** outta his own guy.
Image
User avatar
BUCKnation
RealGM
Posts: 20,121
And1: 4,550
Joined: Jun 15, 2011
       

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#662 » by BUCKnation » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:39 am

Sendejo dirty hitting his own guy
User avatar
Magic Giannison
RealGM
Posts: 27,848
And1: 27,302
Joined: Aug 08, 2014
   

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#663 » by Magic Giannison » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:39 am

ohh **** that eagles guy gt destroyed by his teammate,hope he is well
User avatar
MoMM
RealGM
Posts: 10,593
And1: 1,781
Joined: Jan 08, 2002
Location: Brazilian in Barcelona
Contact:
       

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#664 » by MoMM » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:40 am

trwi7 wrote:
MoMM wrote:
trwi7 wrote:
It absolutely made sense.

Please explain to me, because I didn't understand it, neither the Brazilian broadcasters.


There's basically no difference between a 7 or 8 point lead, it's still a one possession game. Getting it up to 9 makes it a two possession game and there's no disadvantage because if you don't make it you're still up by a TD and extra point.

Well, but a 8-point game forces the other team to score a TD and try a 2-point conversion to tie it, I'd say it's better than a TD + extra point.

PS: I'm not a specialist, just a Packers long time fan trying to better learn the game.
User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 63,122
And1: 41,646
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#665 » by emunney » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:40 am

Big Bob Tonyan taunting the dude with the spinal injury
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
ACGB
RealGM
Posts: 10,770
And1: 2,902
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Location: 414
 

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#666 » by ACGB » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:40 am

Eagles reckless as ****. This sport is stupid.
XtremeDunkz
General Manager
Posts: 8,512
And1: 7,063
Joined: Mar 08, 2012
       

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#667 » by XtremeDunkz » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:41 am

emunney wrote:
thomchatt3rton wrote:If we get a TD, would you go for 2?


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app


Yes because I am tired.
Not without davante. Yes if he didn't get hurt.

Still wish we went for 2 in Arizona.

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
10/27/16
Nemesis21 wrote:It is absolutely hilarious hearing people still say Embiid has superstar potential.The guy is one injury away from being Greg Oden.:lol: Except Oden manged to play over 100 games in the NBA, I don't think Embiid will play more.
TroyD92
RealGM
Posts: 23,737
And1: 11,391
Joined: Mar 28, 2013
Location: Renewed Hope
 

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#668 » by TroyD92 » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:41 am

ACGB wrote:Eagles reckless as ****. This sport is stupid.


Yeah. I’d never let my kids play this ****
VooDoo7 wrote:
JEIS wrote:

Kidd would have curb stomped him.

Maybe if his name was Denise instead of Dennis.


Fotis St wrote:Wherever you are David, I love you man.
User avatar
MartyConlonOnTheRun
RealGM
Posts: 27,850
And1: 13,566
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Location: Section 212 - Raising havoc in Squad 6

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#669 » by MartyConlonOnTheRun » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:41 am

thomchatt3rton wrote:If we get a TD, would you go for 2?


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app

I mean we can't go 0-5 right?
Jollay
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,024
And1: 661
Joined: Apr 25, 2003

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#670 » by Jollay » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:41 am

This game. Actually kind of proud of the boys tonight as much of a line ass whipping as this was.

Jeez, hope Mont Adams can make an impact when he comes back, tho. And Dexter William's can play.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 112,243
And1: 27,893
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#671 » by trwi7 » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:41 am

emunney wrote:
thomchatt3rton wrote:If we get a TD, would you go for 2?


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app


Yes because I am tired.


I feel like this should be the decision making process for all Wisconsin based sports teams from now on.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
StickeeFingaz
RealGM
Posts: 11,319
And1: 7,190
Joined: Jul 12, 2009
     

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#672 » by StickeeFingaz » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:41 am

That's what Sandejo does. Would never want that guy on my team.
#FreeChuckDiesel
awd4cy
Analyst
Posts: 3,315
And1: 1,882
Joined: Nov 23, 2013
     

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#673 » by awd4cy » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:41 am

ACGB wrote:This sport is stupid.

Yet we all watch it every Thursday, Saturday, and Sunday.
XtremeDunkz
General Manager
Posts: 8,512
And1: 7,063
Joined: Mar 08, 2012
       

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#674 » by XtremeDunkz » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:41 am

Hope this guy is okay but this kills our momentum.

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
10/27/16
Nemesis21 wrote:It is absolutely hilarious hearing people still say Embiid has superstar potential.The guy is one injury away from being Greg Oden.:lol: Except Oden manged to play over 100 games in the NBA, I don't think Embiid will play more.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 112,243
And1: 27,893
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#675 » by trwi7 » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:42 am

XtremeDunkz wrote:
emunney wrote:
thomchatt3rton wrote:If we get a TD, would you go for 2?


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app


Yes because I am tired.
Not without davante. Yes if he didn't get hurt.

Still wish we went for 2 in Arizona.

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk


Wouldn't it make more sense to do it with our #1 receiver out and with our defense playing like ****?
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
MissKhriddleton
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,330
And1: 3,655
Joined: Nov 03, 2015
 

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#676 » by MissKhriddleton » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:42 am

MoMM wrote:
trwi7 wrote:
MoMM wrote:Please explain to me, because I didn't understand it, neither the Brazilian broadcasters.


There's basically no difference between a 7 or 8 point lead, it's still a one possession game. Getting it up to 9 makes it a two possession game and there's no disadvantage because if you don't make it you're still up by a TD and extra point.

Well, but a 8-point game forces the other team to score a TD and try a 2-point conversion to tie it, I'd say it's better than a TD + extra point.

PS: I'm not a specialist, just a Packers long time fan trying to better learn the game.

I think if the conversion rate is above 50% then it makes sense. If it's below then it doesn't. I'm not sure what the conversion rate is.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 112,243
And1: 27,893
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#677 » by trwi7 » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:42 am

awd4cy wrote:
ACGB wrote:This sport is stupid.

Yet we all watch it every Thursday, Saturday, and Sunday.


And Monday as long as it's on mute.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
dedned
Analyst
Posts: 3,737
And1: 1,480
Joined: Feb 02, 2005
Location: nowhere
       

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#678 » by dedned » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:43 am

The helmets have to be worse than back in the day. I don't remember MFs dying when taking a shot to the head.
Image
User avatar
BUCKnation
RealGM
Posts: 20,121
And1: 4,550
Joined: Jun 15, 2011
       

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#679 » by BUCKnation » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:43 am

MoMM wrote:
trwi7 wrote:
MoMM wrote:Please explain to me, because I didn't understand it, neither the Brazilian broadcasters.


There's basically no difference between a 7 or 8 point lead, it's still a one possession game. Getting it up to 9 makes it a two possession game and there's no disadvantage because if you don't make it you're still up by a TD and extra point.

Well, but a 8-point game forces the other team to score a TD and try a 2-point conversion to tie it, I'd say it's better than a TD + extra point.

PS: I'm not a specialist, just a Packers long time fan trying to better learn the game.

2 pt conversions are converted about 60%, probably higher with someone like Rodgers, despite the earlier incompetence at the goal line. XP's are only converted at like 90%. Tying the game in a 9 pt deficit in one possession is 0%. Like I said before it's just simply the reward is far greater than the risk. It may have been a bit early, but imagine a 9 pt lead for the Eagles right now.
TroyD92
RealGM
Posts: 23,737
And1: 11,391
Joined: Mar 28, 2013
Location: Renewed Hope
 

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#680 » by TroyD92 » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:43 am

What is that small group of fans trying to chant ?
VooDoo7 wrote:
JEIS wrote:

Kidd would have curb stomped him.

Maybe if his name was Denise instead of Dennis.


Fotis St wrote:Wherever you are David, I love you man.

Return to Green Bay Packers