Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
- dedned
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,737
- And1: 1,480
- Joined: Feb 02, 2005
- Location: nowhere
-
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
- BUCKnation
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,121
- And1: 4,550
- Joined: Jun 15, 2011
-
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
Sendejo dirty hitting his own guy
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
- Magic Giannison
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,848
- And1: 27,302
- Joined: Aug 08, 2014
-
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
ohh **** that eagles guy gt destroyed by his teammate,hope he is well
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
- MoMM
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,594
- And1: 1,781
- Joined: Jan 08, 2002
- Location: Brazilian in Barcelona
- Contact:
-
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
trwi7 wrote:MoMM wrote:trwi7 wrote:
It absolutely made sense.
Please explain to me, because I didn't understand it, neither the Brazilian broadcasters.
There's basically no difference between a 7 or 8 point lead, it's still a one possession game. Getting it up to 9 makes it a two possession game and there's no disadvantage because if you don't make it you're still up by a TD and extra point.
Well, but a 8-point game forces the other team to score a TD and try a 2-point conversion to tie it, I'd say it's better than a TD + extra point.
PS: I'm not a specialist, just a Packers long time fan trying to better learn the game.
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
- emunney
- RealGM
- Posts: 63,123
- And1: 41,646
- Joined: Feb 22, 2005
- Location: where takes go to be pampered
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
Big Bob Tonyan taunting the dude with the spinal injury
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
-
ACGB
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,770
- And1: 2,903
- Joined: Jan 24, 2006
- Location: 414
-
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
Eagles reckless as ****. This sport is stupid.
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
-
XtremeDunkz
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,512
- And1: 7,063
- Joined: Mar 08, 2012
-
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
Not without davante. Yes if he didn't get hurt.emunney wrote:
Yes because I am tired.
Still wish we went for 2 in Arizona.
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
10/27/16
Nemesis21 wrote:It is absolutely hilarious hearing people still say Embiid has superstar potential.The guy is one injury away from being Greg Oden.Except Oden manged to play over 100 games in the NBA, I don't think Embiid will play more.
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
-
TroyD92
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,737
- And1: 11,392
- Joined: Mar 28, 2013
- Location: Renewed Hope
-
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
ACGB wrote:Eagles reckless as ****. This sport is stupid.
Yeah. I’d never let my kids play this ****
VooDoo7 wrote:JEIS wrote:
Kidd would have curb stomped him.
Maybe if his name was Denise instead of Dennis.
Fotis St wrote:Wherever you are David, I love you man.
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
- MartyConlonOnTheRun
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,851
- And1: 13,566
- Joined: Jun 27, 2006
- Location: Section 212 - Raising havoc in Squad 6
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
I mean we can't go 0-5 right?
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
-
Jollay
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 13,024
- And1: 661
- Joined: Apr 25, 2003
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
This game. Actually kind of proud of the boys tonight as much of a line ass whipping as this was.
Jeez, hope Mont Adams can make an impact when he comes back, tho. And Dexter William's can play.
Jeez, hope Mont Adams can make an impact when he comes back, tho. And Dexter William's can play.
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 112,243
- And1: 27,896
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
emunney wrote:
Yes because I am tired.
I feel like this should be the decision making process for all Wisconsin based sports teams from now on.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
- StickeeFingaz
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,319
- And1: 7,190
- Joined: Jul 12, 2009
-
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
That's what Sandejo does. Would never want that guy on my team.
#FreeChuckDiesel
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
-
awd4cy
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,315
- And1: 1,882
- Joined: Nov 23, 2013
-
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
ACGB wrote:This sport is stupid.
Yet we all watch it every Thursday, Saturday, and Sunday.
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
-
XtremeDunkz
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,512
- And1: 7,063
- Joined: Mar 08, 2012
-
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
Hope this guy is okay but this kills our momentum.
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
10/27/16
Nemesis21 wrote:It is absolutely hilarious hearing people still say Embiid has superstar potential.The guy is one injury away from being Greg Oden.Except Oden manged to play over 100 games in the NBA, I don't think Embiid will play more.
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 112,243
- And1: 27,896
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
XtremeDunkz wrote:Not without davante. Yes if he didn't get hurt.emunney wrote:
Yes because I am tired.
Still wish we went for 2 in Arizona.
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
Wouldn't it make more sense to do it with our #1 receiver out and with our defense playing like ****?
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
- MissKhriddleton
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,330
- And1: 3,655
- Joined: Nov 03, 2015
-
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
MoMM wrote:trwi7 wrote:MoMM wrote:Please explain to me, because I didn't understand it, neither the Brazilian broadcasters.
There's basically no difference between a 7 or 8 point lead, it's still a one possession game. Getting it up to 9 makes it a two possession game and there's no disadvantage because if you don't make it you're still up by a TD and extra point.
Well, but a 8-point game forces the other team to score a TD and try a 2-point conversion to tie it, I'd say it's better than a TD + extra point.
PS: I'm not a specialist, just a Packers long time fan trying to better learn the game.
I think if the conversion rate is above 50% then it makes sense. If it's below then it doesn't. I'm not sure what the conversion rate is.
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 112,243
- And1: 27,896
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
awd4cy wrote:ACGB wrote:This sport is stupid.
Yet we all watch it every Thursday, Saturday, and Sunday.
And Monday as long as it's on mute.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
- dedned
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,737
- And1: 1,480
- Joined: Feb 02, 2005
- Location: nowhere
-
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
The helmets have to be worse than back in the day. I don't remember MFs dying when taking a shot to the head.

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
- BUCKnation
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,121
- And1: 4,550
- Joined: Jun 15, 2011
-
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
MoMM wrote:trwi7 wrote:MoMM wrote:Please explain to me, because I didn't understand it, neither the Brazilian broadcasters.
There's basically no difference between a 7 or 8 point lead, it's still a one possession game. Getting it up to 9 makes it a two possession game and there's no disadvantage because if you don't make it you're still up by a TD and extra point.
Well, but a 8-point game forces the other team to score a TD and try a 2-point conversion to tie it, I'd say it's better than a TD + extra point.
PS: I'm not a specialist, just a Packers long time fan trying to better learn the game.
2 pt conversions are converted about 60%, probably higher with someone like Rodgers, despite the earlier incompetence at the goal line. XP's are only converted at like 90%. Tying the game in a 9 pt deficit in one possession is 0%. Like I said before it's just simply the reward is far greater than the risk. It may have been a bit early, but imagine a 9 pt lead for the Eagles right now.
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
-
TroyD92
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,737
- And1: 11,392
- Joined: Mar 28, 2013
- Location: Renewed Hope
-
Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX
What is that small group of fans trying to chant ?
VooDoo7 wrote:JEIS wrote:
Kidd would have curb stomped him.
Maybe if his name was Denise instead of Dennis.
Fotis St wrote:Wherever you are David, I love you man.










