GT #8: Cavs @ Bullets 7 PM (NBCSW/1500 AM)
Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart
Re: GT #8: Cavs @ Bullets 7 PM (NBCSW/1500 AM)
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 47,909
- And1: 11,582
- Joined: Jul 17, 2001
-
Re: GT #8: Cavs @ Bullets 7 PM (NBCSW/1500 AM)
I think they wanted Bryant to take more 3's this season, but that hasn't worked out well. Comments that Brooks has made indicate they want him to cut down on the 3's and have his shot distribution pretty much like last seasons. My thinking is - that'll help in the short run - but maybe not in the long run.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
Re: GT #8: Cavs @ Bullets 7 PM (NBCSW/1500 AM)
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,319
- And1: 703
- Joined: Oct 20, 2017
-
Re: GT #8: Cavs @ Bullets 7 PM (NBCSW/1500 AM)
long suffrin' boulez fan wrote:nate33 wrote:Another option would be to shorten the bench and go with a 9-man rotation, with Bertans getting a lot more SF minutes:
Well. This rotation just makes too much sense.
Ergo. Brooks won’t do it.
On NBA.com stats I can't find that Beal, Rui, Bryant, and Brown Jr. have played one minute together. I don't care who the fifth one is, I'd like to see those 4 play together.
Re: GT #8: Cavs @ Bullets 7 PM (NBCSW/1500 AM)
- nate33
- Forum Mod - Wizards
- Posts: 70,102
- And1: 22,528
- Joined: Oct 28, 2002
Re: GT #8: Cavs @ Bullets 7 PM (NBCSW/1500 AM)
trast66 wrote:long suffrin' boulez fan wrote:nate33 wrote:Another option would be to shorten the bench and go with a 9-man rotation, with Bertans getting a lot more SF minutes:
Well. This rotation just makes too much sense.
Ergo. Brooks won’t do it.
On NBA.com stats I can't find that Beal, Rui, Bryant, and Brown Jr. have played one minute together. I don't care who the fifth one is, I'd like to see those 4 play together.
NBA.com must update their numbers slowly (and therefore only have the games from before Brown came back from injury).
According to basketballreference, that Beal, Rui, Bryant, Brown lineup is the most common 4-man grouping of players involving Brown:
https://www.basketball-reference.com/players/b/browntr01/lineups/2020
Unfortunately, the 5th guy has been Isaiah Thomas for the most part (27 minutes), and during those minutes, the group's point differential was -37 per 100 possessions. In the 6 minutes that the 5th guy was Ish, the unit was -2 points per 100 possessions. Those sample sizes are meaningless, though.
Re: GT #8: Cavs @ Bullets 7 PM (NBCSW/1500 AM)
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,319
- And1: 703
- Joined: Oct 20, 2017
-
Re: GT #8: Cavs @ Bullets 7 PM (NBCSW/1500 AM)
nate33 wrote:trast66 wrote:long suffrin' boulez fan wrote:
Well. This rotation just makes too much sense.
Ergo. Brooks won’t do it.
On NBA.com stats I can't find that Beal, Rui, Bryant, and Brown Jr. have played one minute together. I don't care who the fifth one is, I'd like to see those 4 play together.
NBA.com must update their numbers slowly (and therefore only have the games from before Brown came back from injury).
According to basketballreference, that Beal, Rui, Bryant, Brown lineup is the most common 4-man grouping of players involving Brown:
https://www.basketball-reference.com/players/b/browntr01/lineups/2020
Unfortunately, the 5th guy has been Isaiah Thomas for the most part (27 minutes), and during those minutes, the group's point differential was -37 per 100 possessions. In the 6 minutes that the 5th guy was Ish, the unit was -2 points per 100 possessions. Those sample sizes are meaningless, though.
Thanks for the link! Those 4 need a penetration stopper with them, which we don't have one the roster.
Re: GT #8: Cavs @ Bullets 7 PM (NBCSW/1500 AM)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,143
- And1: 7,905
- Joined: Jun 23, 2001
- Location: Columbus, OH
-
Re: GT #8: Cavs @ Bullets 7 PM (NBCSW/1500 AM)
Ruzious wrote:I think they wanted Bryant to take more 3's this season, but that hasn't worked out well. Comments that Brooks has made indicate they want him to cut down on the 3's and have his shot distribution pretty much like last seasons. My thinking is - that'll help in the short run - but maybe not in the long run.
Right! They are sending mixed signals. This is when management development objectives might not necessarily mesh with win now objectives of the head coach.
Re: GT #8: Cavs @ Bullets 7 PM (NBCSW/1500 AM)
- nate33
- Forum Mod - Wizards
- Posts: 70,102
- And1: 22,528
- Joined: Oct 28, 2002
Re: GT #8: Cavs @ Bullets 7 PM (NBCSW/1500 AM)
Dat2U wrote:Ruzious wrote:I think they wanted Bryant to take more 3's this season, but that hasn't worked out well. Comments that Brooks has made indicate they want him to cut down on the 3's and have his shot distribution pretty much like last seasons. My thinking is - that'll help in the short run - but maybe not in the long run.
Right! They are sending mixed signals. This is when management development objectives might not necessarily mesh with win now objectives of the head coach.
This season, I feel like Bryant is rushing his 3's in an effort to launch a lot more of them. I think it's fine if Bryant shoots the 3, if he has time to get square.
Wagner is a good example of what Bryant should be doing. Wagner's 3's never appear to be contested. If he's open, he'll launch it without hesitation, but he doesn't rush it when he's not quite open.
Re: GT #8: Cavs @ Bullets 7 PM (NBCSW/1500 AM)
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 47,909
- And1: 11,582
- Joined: Jul 17, 2001
-
Re: GT #8: Cavs @ Bullets 7 PM (NBCSW/1500 AM)
nate33 wrote:Dat2U wrote:Ruzious wrote:I think they wanted Bryant to take more 3's this season, but that hasn't worked out well. Comments that Brooks has made indicate they want him to cut down on the 3's and have his shot distribution pretty much like last seasons. My thinking is - that'll help in the short run - but maybe not in the long run.
Right! They are sending mixed signals. This is when management development objectives might not necessarily mesh with win now objectives of the head coach.
This season, I feel like Bryant is rushing his 3's in an effort to launch a lot more of them. I think it's fine if Bryant shoots the 3, if he has time to get square.
Wagner is a good example of what Bryant should be doing. Wagner's 3's never appear to be contested. If he's open, he'll launch it without hesitation, but he doesn't rush it when he's not quite open.
I think Bryant's watching his buddy Beal when he should watch Wagner.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
Re: GT #8: Cavs @ Bullets 7 PM (NBCSW/1500 AM)
- nate33
- Forum Mod - Wizards
- Posts: 70,102
- And1: 22,528
- Joined: Oct 28, 2002
Re: GT #8: Cavs @ Bullets 7 PM (NBCSW/1500 AM)
Ruzious wrote:nate33 wrote:Dat2U wrote:
Right! They are sending mixed signals. This is when management development objectives might not necessarily mesh with win now objectives of the head coach.
This season, I feel like Bryant is rushing his 3's in an effort to launch a lot more of them. I think it's fine if Bryant shoots the 3, if he has time to get square.
Wagner is a good example of what Bryant should be doing. Wagner's 3's never appear to be contested. If he's open, he'll launch it without hesitation, but he doesn't rush it when he's not quite open.
I think Bryant's watching his buddy Beal when he should watch Wagner.
Oddly, Beal actually shoots them better when he's contested. It's the open 3's that vex him.
He is currently shooting 28.6% when a defender is 2-4 feet away, 30.6% when a defender is 4-6 feet away, and inexplicably, 28.0% when a defender is 6 or more feet away.
Re: GT #8: Cavs @ Bullets 7 PM (NBCSW/1500 AM)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,925
- And1: 9,310
- Joined: Mar 29, 2005
- Location: So long Wizturdz.
-
Re: GT #8: Cavs @ Bullets 7 PM (NBCSW/1500 AM)
nate33 wrote:Oddly, Beal actually shoots them better when he's contested. It's the open 3's that vex him.
He is currently shooting 28.6% when a defender is 2-4 feet away, 30.6% when a defender is 4-6 feet away, and inexplicably, 28.0% when a defender is 6 or more feet away.
Same story as last year.