Susan wrote:Hey Doug, don't want to put you on the spot but you're ridiculously optimistic about the Bulls but way more subdued when talking about the Bears. I happen to be the opposite but I'm just interested in hearing out if you agree with that statement and why you have rose colored glasses for the Bulls but a more grim outlook for the Bears.
Cowboys and Vikes should be wins. Bears have owned the Vikes HARD the past two years and Akeem Hicks should be back by then for sure.
I am extremely down on the Bulls now. They're a bottom 3 team in the NBA. I thought they could be a .500 team to start the season, but I also said I thought they had no ceiling past the 2nd round and could just be a bit above average when they peak and their ability to be good was based more on the ridiculously awfulness that was the East. I bought into Lauri/Otto being good and Zach being minorly improved with Sato/Young being solid additions. The trip from awful to average is usually not that hard.
As for the Bears, based on what they've done this year, I don't think anything I said is irrational was probably overly optimistic on the Bulls to start the season, but even then, I never thought they would be a great team, just thought they could be average. In general, all teams head towards average, so I would generally always be more optimistic about an awful team improving and generally be more pessimistic about a great team holding steady or becoming even greater.