Hes_On_Fire wrote:Iron Mantis wrote:KnicksGod wrote:Here’s the logical deal: If a team valued Luka properly, they would have paid almost any price the Hawks or anybody else wanted. But no signs that teams did value him that highly, although many may not have had the assets to get him.
Mavs maybe just got a better deal but would have upped their bid. A lot of teams could not have equaled the Dallas offer but might’ve also wanted Luka.
Luka was not close to a consensus top overall pick which he clearly should’ve been. So Dakomish is treading in some major 20/20 hindsight waters which is a common but silly thing to do.
Team tank was very consistent,
I remember the Tank 4 Doncic memes in many threads until it became an impossibility.
Yeah, not sure why history is being changed.
Doncic was highly coveted for like 2 years before he was even eligible for the draft.
He wasn’t taken first or even highly considered for it. Which means he was undervalued.
What’s the point of examining this or that yarn of tanking when the whole tapestry has holes and is randomly stitched together?
We didn’t tank properly is a fallacy — if all teams in the hunt tanked properly, then what makes you think we’d win the tank?
Second, Luka was not scouted as a dominant player. He was thought of as a very good prospect and now he’s generational. That’s a big gap.
But, to those who loved him, kudos to you seriously. The teams didn’t scout him that way though ... that’s not revisionist, we have the actual draft lol!
... Ingram just choked.