wco81 wrote:Yeah but after his rookie year, there were many posters here saying Tatum was going to eclipse Pierce and be up there in the pantheon with the likes of Bird, Havlicek, etc.
Could still happen since it's so early in his career. But his trajectory hasn't been as steep as some people seemed to expect.
I don't think you understand the Pantheon very well. Some of Boston's greatest players where not huge stat guys the Pantheon is not measured in points and rebounds it is measured in titles. Pierce had big numbers because his teammates sucked early in his career he didn't win more than half his games until his 4th season. Havlicek has huge numbers because he played forever but most of the early part of his career he came of the bench same for McHale.
What this Celtics team looks like is what most great Celtics teams look like. Depth and balance and tenacious home court advantage. Boston's success is rarely about one star dominating even when Bird was racking up MVPs it was because of his passing and unselfishness that made it happen, what made Bird the MVP was that McHale and Parish were candidates too.
In the end Championships are what matter but at this point the Celtics have never had a player like Tatum a guy so young who has been an instant contributor and a winner from the jump. The only other player comparable to Tatum as far as age and being a starter from Day 1 was Antoine Walker. The team was historically terrible and two seasons further away than Pierce from winning half their games.
Obviously the environment in Boston is as much about and Ainge and Stevens as it is Tatum, Brown and Walker. But Tatum and Brown had to go out there and do it and at least from a competitive standpoint they have. Now if they want to be in the rafters it is going to have to be a Championship (or 3 or 4).