Leslie Forman wrote:dice wrote:Leslie Forman wrote:Nope. Like I said in the other thread, the speed of recognition he showed there was way quicker than you'll see anyone on this team ever show. If that situation had happened here, the passer, whomever it was, would not have passed it until Ingram was already in the paint. By the time Zion had started the motion of the pass, Ingram had just barely even started his move towards the paint.
It is the execution of those "simple" passes that separates a good passer than just some guy. It looks easy because they made it look easy.
it was a nice pass, but again, nothing to write home about
Those passes didn't display anywhere near the quickness of recognition Zion showed. Those are just "style points" passes. They only looked tough because they only finally decided to pass a millisecond late. If they had recognized the opportunities earlier, the passes wouldn't have looked difficult at all, Coby's in particular. This is why John Stockton's basic bounce passing ass is a better passer than anyone in this league right now throwing behind the back 360 no scope nutmegs.
What really separates the wheat from the chaff in this league isn't talent but this ability to recognize and react quicker. Zion has it. He just happens to have insane talent to go with it.
zion williamson averaged 2 assists per game in college. more turnovers than assists. he has 3 assists vs 6 TO in his 2 nba games. let's not pretend that he is bill walton based on a single good pass where he was double teamed and forced to make something happen quickly, the results of which were dependent on his unguarded teammate making the move to the rim that he hoped for and the defender at the elbow not being aware enough to react quickly and get a hand on the ball
having the reaction time doesn't mean much unless you execute properly. zion will be facing many, many double and even triple teams in his career, forcing him to make a quick pass. will it more often produce results like the play we've been discussing or more results like this one:
time will tell