Thugger HBC wrote:ozwizard8 wrote:Thugger HBC wrote:One move isn't related to the other. KP could have back to back 50 point games and I'm still satisfied he's gone. He didn't want to be here. Could have made much better use of that cap space in the immediate timeline, but no real complaints on the trade front itself.
KP didnt want to be here is BS.
He didnt want to work with current FO. And he was right about it.
I'd rather choose to fire incompetent Fizdale-Perry-Mills trio than letting them trade KP away. Mills-Perry also made sure to write articles on how KP and his brother were toxic and many fans just believed those mouthpieces.
Immediate timeline cap space didn't help anything. When you convince big names like Durant-Irving you can always find the right trade package to offload some contracts.
C.Lee expiring or THJ contracts were not immovable contracts. And THJ right now doesnt look like a negative asset at all too.
It was all about Knicks FO. KP did great. If he was successful Dolan would keep KP and fire Fizdale/Perry/Mills or make them KP's bitch. Then Knicks would have a real chance to build on sth with Barrett-KP-Mitchell foundation.
Front office is also responsible to keep their players believe in their vision. Basically keep them happy. Bucks made the right moves to make Giannis happy with right coaching choice and player acquisitions. If they didn't do that Giannis would ask for a trade for sure.
In any case, everyone should acknowledge that Knicks FO was so incompetent that they traded KP at his lowest value.
I think this would quantify s believing what you choose. It's fine to do so, but the evidence states otherwise.
KP wasn't just unhappy with mills and perry, he didn't care for the exec that drafted him either. Of course that doesn't absolve the current fo as they were terrible.
The latter part of your post is rather unrealistic. Players asked to be traded quite often, and no amount of convincing is gonna make a player change their mind. Once it's out, there is no turning back.
Also winning cures everything....literally. Giannis is happy because of wins. ironically he didn't like the firing of his coach, but winning eclipses that.....for some. Didn't work out quite the same with Kawhi for instance and he's better than both of them.
Of course KP will look happier in dallas...they are winning more games.
I think we're talking about same thing here. Winning would make the player happy.
Bucks FO had a solid plan, signed the right coach and the personnel. They behaved as professionals and they succeed in what they did. Its Bucks FO's success to retain Giannis in a small market team.
Meanwhile, Knicks FO sucked really hard for year after year. And they didnt even try to please KP anyhow.
What was Fizdale nonsense? S.Perry signing? Worst of the worst hired by Knicks. Would you spend your career under those idiots?
TWolves FO isn't a good one but even they made a trade to please KAT. Without the Russell trade and a new plan KAT would be asking for out. Still if they fail in their plan, if they sign/trade wrong players, if they don't change their coach with a good one they'll LOSE more games and KAT will be unhappy.
This is a common thing in NBA. Max contract players asking for a trade after couple years in their extension. A.Davis is a great example. Some finishes their extension contract for instance KD left in FA.
No one would surprise if KAT asks for a trade in a year. Or lets say Jokic might ask for a trade in 3 years.
Knicks FO acted hostile to KP. They didnt try to please him. They weren't able to hire competent coach. They didnt have any real plan for future.
I wouldn't mind if KP stayed 2 more years and asked for a trade. And believe me Knicks would compensated more in a trade like that. Knicks traded KP at his lowest value and thats the issue. KP had many flaws, injury risks but still, Knicks could've got more from him either in a future trade or as a piece in the team with Barrett-KP-Mitchell frontcourt.