ImageImageImageImage

Red Sox v. MFY (8/28 - 8/30)

User avatar
mr_sunshine
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,430
And1: 482
Joined: Jun 30, 2007

 

Post#41 » by mr_sunshine » Thu Aug 30, 2007 7:35 pm

Celtic Esquire wrote:It's clear that the Red Sox can't hit against good pitching.

And oh yes, JD Drew still sucks.


It doesn't help when you have Hinske, Cora, and Drew in the lineup... but yah.
alwayslovetheceltics
Analyst
Posts: 3,087
And1: 7
Joined: Feb 08, 2006

 

Post#42 » by alwayslovetheceltics » Thu Aug 30, 2007 8:15 pm

JD Drew. go die along with f'n yankees and their fans.
User avatar
Chach
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 12,330
And1: 2
Joined: Jan 23, 2003

 

Post#43 » by Chach » Thu Aug 30, 2007 10:06 pm

This team is absolute gutless. I refuse to watch another game until the next Yankees series and if they don't show some fight, I am getting off the bandwagon completely because this team won't do jack in the playoffs. Every card except home field advantage was with the Sox before this series and they get SWEPT? I am sick to my stomach to be a Red Sox fan right now. mahalo
~Chach~
User avatar
NH_soxfan14
Junior
Posts: 388
And1: 1
Joined: Aug 08, 2007
Location: New Hampshire

 

Post#44 » by NH_soxfan14 » Fri Aug 31, 2007 3:46 am

At least Joba Chamberlain just turned into a fan favorite at Fenway Park.
Image

RSN
User avatar
HeelSox
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,303
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 03, 2004
Location: Hansbrough's World

 

Post#45 » by HeelSox » Fri Aug 31, 2007 4:21 am

so uhhh...go mets?
"The guy is an idiot," Pedroia said regarding Cabrera. "I dropped my bat. It kind of freaked me out. I was upset they took him out of the game. He is good to hit. He's 9-15. The guy [stinks]."
User avatar
Bleeding Green
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 24,178
And1: 13,875
Joined: Feb 28, 2005
Location: Atlantic Champs OMG OMG OMG!

 

Post#46 » by Bleeding Green » Fri Aug 31, 2007 5:13 am

This is all a conspiracy by corporate television to raise ratings for the rest of the season. The Red Sox could have easily swept, but what is the fun in that? The season is over at that point. A Yankees sweep makes the rest of the season much more exciting.

Thanks NESN.
Manocad wrote:I have an engineering degree, an exceptionally high IQ, and can point to the exact location/area of any country on an unlabeled globe.
User avatar
Basketball Jesus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,180
And1: 7
Joined: Sep 04, 2003
Location: P-nuts + hair doos

 

Post#47 » by Basketball Jesus » Fri Aug 31, 2007 12:43 pm

Chach wrote:This team is absolute gutless. I refuse to watch another game until the next Yankees series and if they don't show some fight, I am getting off the bandwagon completely because this team won't do jack in the playoffs. Every card except home field advantage was with the Sox before this series and they get SWEPT? I am sick to my stomach to be a Red Sox fan right now. mahalo
~Chach~



Join the Organization to Free Aaron Laffey. Our objective is almost complete.
Manocad wrote:The universe is the age it is. We can all agree it's 13 billion years old, and nothing changes. We can all agree it's 6000 years old, and nothing changes. We can all disagree on how old it is, and nothing changes. Some people really need a hobby.
34Celtic
Analyst
Posts: 3,406
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 02, 2007

Re: Red Sox v. MFY (8/28 - 8/30) 

Post#48 » by 34Celtic » Fri Aug 31, 2007 2:08 pm

Bleeding Green wrote:Just sweep these clowns. Payback for last year, I say. Why Boston should sweep:
  • Yankees are coming off a 16-run loss to the Tigers.
  • Red Sox coming off a day of relaxation and rest.
  • Matsuzaka, Beckett, Schilling
  • Pettitte, Clemens, Wang
  • Red Sox bullpen is rested after completely dismantling the White Sox.
  • David Ortiz has found his powerstroke.
  • Johnny Damon is a legitimate DH and leadoff option.
  • Mike Lowell last 18 games: .433/.506/.642
  • Derek Jeter last 17 games: .254/.303/.282
  • Red Sox as a team v. Pettitte: .347/.401/.529 (242 AB)
  • Joba Chamberlain is fat.
While I would love a Red Sox/Yankees ALCS again, I think it would be hilarious if the Red Sox won the division by 15 games just this once.



Welllllp...

Joba Chamberlain is not fat, he is an absolute stud in the making who has cahones.....unlike many Yankees pitchers in the past, and if you think he's Craig Hansen you're wrong, he is much much much better.

kobeSTOPkobeDONT wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

So, cmaff, did you find all the cheap hits the Yankees got "disgusting" (like you were when the Red Sox got about half as many cheap hits against the Angels as the Yankees got tonight) while Clemens posted a .058 BAPIP tonight? :D


Clemens was absolutly filthy that night, he had trouble throwing strikes because his splitter was breaking so hard out of the zone. I can't belive I just saw BABIP used for a start, his stuff was dirty the other night.
HCYanks wrote:Thanks for reminding me Clay Buchholz is a couple of blocks away from me, Fox. Now I have to go hide my laptop.
The Rondo Show
Analyst
Posts: 3,588
And1: 327
Joined: Mar 16, 2006

Re: Red Sox v. MFY (8/28 - 8/30) 

Post#49 » by The Rondo Show » Fri Aug 31, 2007 3:25 pm

34Celtic wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Clemens was absolutly filthy that night, he had trouble throwing strikes because his splitter was breaking so hard out of the zone. I can't belive I just saw BABIP used for a start, his stuff was dirty the other night.
Clemens was as far from filthy as one can be. He topped out in the very low-90's and his splitter was solid but nothing special (aside from the one thrown to Varitek late in the game). He was as hittable as he has been all year, and with him walking as many as he did the Red Sox should've scored 5+ runs off him. How many times do pitchers have "filthy" stuff and strikeout 2 in 6 IP?

He had trouble throwing strikes because his fastball command was not as good as it usually was. How many times did he walk guys or 4-5 pitches and miss by a ton with his fastball when he was trying to throw strikes? Several. The guy was not pitching well, the Red Sox offense just put up a disgusting performance.

As for using the BAPIP/Yankees cheap hits argument, it was a joke to cmaff. He came into the Red Sox/Angels game thread and was "disgusted" by how many cheap hits the Red Sox got-- this was a day after he claimed how it all evens out in the end as I complained the Angels got 3-4 cheap hits in a row off Buchholz. Then he said something like "well, it didn't even out in this game" when I'm sure he realizes it while it usually evens out at the end of the year...it doesn't even out on a game to game basis.

Oh, and Joba Chamberlain is fat. You're right that he is a stud in the making (hell, he's already a stud), but he is still fat.
Image
cmaff051
Inactive user
Inactive user
Posts: 13,071
And1: 2
Joined: Nov 02, 2006

 

Post#50 » by cmaff051 » Fri Aug 31, 2007 4:00 pm

I don't think Clemens looked very impressive, but by the same token, I don't think Daisuke looked very good either. He couldn't put guys away and got away with lots of hangers.
The Rondo Show
Analyst
Posts: 3,588
And1: 327
Joined: Mar 16, 2006

 

Post#51 » by The Rondo Show » Fri Aug 31, 2007 4:04 pm

cmaff051 wrote:I don't think Clemens looked very impressive, but by the same token, I don't think Daisuke looked very good either. He couldn't put guys away and got away with lots of hangers.
I agree. Daisuke was as bad as he has been (stuff wise) since his start against Detroit before the break.
Image
User avatar
VinnyTheMick
RealGM
Posts: 13,843
And1: 5
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: Getting wasted with Ron Swanson.
Contact:

 

Post#52 » by VinnyTheMick » Fri Aug 31, 2007 4:10 pm

Bleeding Green wrote:This is all a conspiracy by corporate television to raise ratings for the rest of the season. The Red Sox could have easily swept, but what is the fun in that? The season is over at that point. A Yankees sweep makes the rest of the season much more exciting.

Thanks NESN.



:crazy: :rofl: :rofl: :crazy:
http://www.nyccan.org/
Ask questions. Demand answers.
A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth.- Albert Einstein
34Celtic
Analyst
Posts: 3,406
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 02, 2007

 

Post#53 » by 34Celtic » Fri Aug 31, 2007 4:26 pm

All this said, I'd still take Clemens over 4/5 of the league down the stretch, and over any Red Sox starter, hell any Yankee starter outside of Pettitte and Wang. Sorry, we just seem to own Beckett, Dice-K doesn't impress me, Schilling is Mike Mussina waiting to happen, Lester/Tavarez???c'mon. Wakefield is the only one who scares me and we usually fair decently against him
HCYanks wrote:Thanks for reminding me Clay Buchholz is a couple of blocks away from me, Fox. Now I have to go hide my laptop.
cmaff051
Inactive user
Inactive user
Posts: 13,071
And1: 2
Joined: Nov 02, 2006

 

Post#54 » by cmaff051 » Fri Aug 31, 2007 4:32 pm

34Celtic wrote:All this said, I'd still take Clemens over 4/5 of the league down the stretch, and over any Red Sox starter, hell any Yankee starter outside of Pettitte and Wang. Sorry, we just seem to own Beckett, Dice-K doesn't impress me, Schilling is Mike Mussina waiting to happen, Lester/Tavarez???c'mon. Wakefield is the only one who scares me and we usually fair decently against him


I'd take Beckett over Clemens. Beckett has put together a very good season, despite getting hit around a bit by the Yankees. He could shut us down in the postseason (if we get there) easily.

And in case you've forgot, Clemens has been only average this season.
The Rondo Show
Analyst
Posts: 3,588
And1: 327
Joined: Mar 16, 2006

 

Post#55 » by The Rondo Show » Fri Aug 31, 2007 4:37 pm

Clemens over Beckett? lol. Clemens stuff and command is no better than Schilling's either, so if you view Schilling as "Mussina waiting to happen" then the same should be said for Clemens.

And where exactly does Clemens beat out Matsuzaka? Dice-K has a lower ERA, lower WHIP, a far better K/9, goes deeper into games. He is simply a better pitcher than Clemens.

Based on your statement that Clemens was "filthy" when he clearly wasn't even close to filthy and that you'd take him over Josh Beckett who has been downright dominant this year...I'd say there's a pretty damn good chance you are a Roger Clemens fan boy.

Wakefield has had a nice season, but I'm not sure why he'd scare you. The Yankees hammer him (recently anyways, there was a few years where he absolutely owned the Yanks) and he is the Red Sox 3rd or 4th best starter.
Image
34Celtic
Analyst
Posts: 3,406
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 02, 2007

 

Post#56 » by 34Celtic » Fri Aug 31, 2007 4:37 pm

thats fine, but I've seen him pitch some very good games, and not saying Beckett won't do it some day, but he isn't the pitcher Clemens is.
HCYanks wrote:Thanks for reminding me Clay Buchholz is a couple of blocks away from me, Fox. Now I have to go hide my laptop.
The Rondo Show
Analyst
Posts: 3,588
And1: 327
Joined: Mar 16, 2006

 

Post#57 » by The Rondo Show » Fri Aug 31, 2007 4:38 pm

34Celtic wrote:thats fine, but I've seen him pitch some very good games, and not saying Beckett won't do it some day, but he isn't the pitcher Clemens is.
You're right, he's not even close to the pitcher Clemens is.

He is far better.
Image
cmaff051
Inactive user
Inactive user
Posts: 13,071
And1: 2
Joined: Nov 02, 2006

 

Post#58 » by cmaff051 » Fri Aug 31, 2007 4:41 pm

34Celtic wrote:thats fine, but I've seen him pitch some very good games, and not saying Beckett won't do it some day, but he isn't the pitcher Clemens is.


Who cares what pitcher Clemens was during his career? Or 5 years ago? Or even 3 years ago? He isn't the same pitcher. He isn't 25 anymore, he isn't even 35, he's 45.

Beckett has been a far better pitcher than Clemens this year.
The Rondo Show
Analyst
Posts: 3,588
And1: 327
Joined: Mar 16, 2006

 

Post#59 » by The Rondo Show » Fri Aug 31, 2007 4:50 pm

cmaff051 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Who cares what pitcher Clemens was 5 years ago? Or even 3 years ago? He isn't the same pitcher. He isn't 25 anymore, he isn't even 35, he's 45.

Beckett has been a far better pitcher than Clemens this year.
Yeah, not to mention, his logic was absolutely absurd.

"I've seen Clemens pitch some very good games and not saying Beckett won't do it some day" --- Ummm, he has already pitched plenty of them in his career. If you (34Celtic) didn't see them (and you should've considering how did win WS MVP against your team in the 2003 WS), then you need to watch some more baseball. It isn't Josh Beckett's fault you watch nothing but Yankees games (and decide to not watch them when they make the World Series and Beckett is pitching).

One guy is putting together a Cy Young caliber season, the other is having a season that is a little above average. Clemens is no longer close to the type of pitcher Beckett is.
Image
User avatar
Basketball Jesus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,180
And1: 7
Joined: Sep 04, 2003
Location: P-nuts + hair doos

 

Post#60 » by Basketball Jesus » Fri Aug 31, 2007 5:11 pm

I love cmaff in a totally platonic and nohomo way. He's like a PG-13 version of vyse.
Manocad wrote:The universe is the age it is. We can all agree it's 13 billion years old, and nothing changes. We can all agree it's 6000 years old, and nothing changes. We can all disagree on how old it is, and nothing changes. Some people really need a hobby.

Return to Boston Red Sox