Homer38 wrote:scrabbarista wrote:Homer38 wrote:
Harden was not even the best player of his team in february.
Harden scored more (totals), rebounded more, assisted more, stole more, blocked more, won more, had better impact numbers (+/-), better shooting numbers (TS%), and better turnover numbers (per game) than Westbrook in February.
He contributed more than Westbrook in literally everything except cool dunks and media content.
Maybe you are right that Harden was better,but this is too close…
Harden: 31.9/6.5/7.9 in 35.6 MPG, 64.5 TS%, +9.7 netrtg, 18.1 PIE, -2,0%(DIFF%) and a 9-2 record
Westbrook: 33.4/7.3/6 in 36.8 MPG, 59.4 TS%, +9.3 netrtg, 17.6 PIE, -2,0%(DIFF%) and a 7-1 record
True, but Harden leads in assists, shooting, impact, PIE, and games played. Westbrook leads in just points and rebounds - by tiny margins. Harden takes 5 of the 7 metrics listed.
On the other hand, LeBron has an even worse case for "best player on his team in February" than Harden does:
Lebron: 26/8.1/10.1 in 34.9 MPG, 58.8 TS%, +8.0 netrtg, 18.8 PIE, +2,4%(DIFF%) and a 8-2 record
AD: 26/9.8/3.3 in 33.0 MPG, 60.5 TS%, +6.1 netrtg, 17.5 PIE, -4,5%(DIFF%) and a 9-2 record
(for those who aren't familiar with it, a negative is better for DIFF%)
AD leads LeBron in 4 out of 7.
Harden takes 5 of 8 against LeBron. Even Westbrook takes 4 of 8 against LeBron.
I know it's only Player of the Month. And Antetokounmpo not winning was maybe as bad. The only case against him seems to be that he played 9 games while Tatum played 12. Still, I guess I only bring it up because no one thinks Tatum has had a better season than Antetokounmpo, while most people, erroneously, seem to think James has had a better season than Harden. This award can only increase that misconception, whereas there's no danger of it doing so between Antetokounmpo and Tatum.
All human life on the earth is like grass, and all human glory is like a flower in a field. The grass dries up and its flower falls off, but the Lord’s word endures forever.