rugbyrugger23 wrote:Ecmic wrote:rugbyrugger23 wrote:And you personally believe that is because of direct action of one man — Trump?
And to clarify, he got true reports that testing could be ramped up so everyone could be tested weeks/months ago. He got intel that entire US would need to be tested and capability is there — but he said “nope.” All on his own accord?
It’s a cluster on many levels, and yes the boss bears responsibility.
You didn’t answer question.
Of course the buck stops at the top. And he should be second guessed. As should all politicians on all sides, by all people. Consistent and evenly applied criticism for all parties. We the people should not take things at face value.
But unlike you, I know POTUS and his administration and all our political leaders have more data and intel and guidance and resources to make a decision and course of action at that precise moment and time.
I don’t care that they have more data and intel than us. If they don’t analyze that data correctly (or worse, if they weaponize it), it has no value to me.
When the President in early March says, "within a couple of days [new cases are] going to be down to close to zero. That's a pretty good job we've done”, are we to trust his data? Or our lying eyes?
When he claims, in February, no less, that “anybody that needs a test gets a test”, are we to find refuge that he has access to special data and intel that give faith in the veracity of his words? Even if we can’t
actually get tested?
At what “precise moment and time” are we to believe new cases will reach zero? At what “precise moment and time” will all people that need a test be able to get one?
These aren’t rhetorical questions.
When it comes to this virus, it’s been a cluster from the top down.
I have no use for the Presidents words, or intel.
And we still can’t get tests.