MagicFan101 wrote:spinedoc wrote:MagicFan101 wrote:
I don’t care about left or right wing high school drama media outlets.
I care about the elected President of the United States calling a pandemic now expected to soon top 100,000 US deaths a “hoax” during a window of action for saving lives.
Its not high school drama. You have one major outlet that was intentionally putting out false information, now finding out that they were sorely wrong and deflecting it onto others. This is why you can't say a pox on both of your houses, pretend like its a problem on all sides when it clearly is not. This is what politicians are doing as well. So, people just hear the noise, don't take time to research the facts and information, and condemn the whole process. Facts matter, sources matter, information matters. So, are we going to just allow people to continue to put out bad information unchallenged, or at some point do we try to blunt or stop it as a community? What are we to do then? When I see bad information, whether its medical or political or whatever, I respond. What will the rest of you do? Apathy doesn't work in a democracy, not effectively. At some point all of us need to speak truth or we see everything we care about die on the vine. This is what I mean about getting involved. Take a stand for truth and quit condemning those who are already committed to it.
So you care more about the quality of the media than what is going on in the Oval Office?
No, not at all, but it doesn't mean I don't care about truth. We all can have an opinion, and that's why I think all cable news is rather pathetic. Too much opinion and feelings wrapped around the information that we all need to be aware and make proper decisions. I get that part of it, but one outlet has been working as state T.V. for this administration, and that part is not equal on both sides. CNN and MSNBC as pathetic as they are at times, don't deliberately hold back information, or put out a false narrative, to make their political wants a reality. Well, at least not to the extreme that Fox does. During Bill Clinton's scandals, they ruminated about them daily. The same goes for Hillary's emails, they didn't hold back with the gossip portion of their show at all, because it sold and increased ratings. I too miss the days where the anchor just read copy, gave us the information, and we were responsible for how it made us feel. My response to BMP was because he put out an observable mis-truth. Anyone that has been following along knows that the viewpoint from the right was that those cable channels were over hyping it, trying to make Trump look bad, their latest hoax. Now, they want to play it off the other way around? Noway. Let's argue over opinion, but in order to do that we have to discern fact from opinion first. There is no arguing over facts, they just are. That's what I have a problem with, not you btw. I just used your comment to make a point.
