Semi-OT: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Discussion Thread

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

MotownMadness
RealGM
Posts: 38,756
And1: 22,819
Joined: Oct 08, 2013
   

Re: Semi-OT: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Discussion Thread 

Post#141 » by MotownMadness » Mon Apr 13, 2020 8:01 pm

This is wild, im at the doctors so i can get a refill on my meds and they just come out and do everything in the parking lot.
MotownMadness
RealGM
Posts: 38,756
And1: 22,819
Joined: Oct 08, 2013
   

Re: Semi-OT: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Discussion Thread 

Post#142 » by MotownMadness » Mon Apr 13, 2020 10:34 pm

My mom said she got her stimulus check today, i havent yet but hopefully soon.
JulesWinnfield
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,825
And1: 6,483
Joined: Mar 24, 2013
Location: NY
   

Re: Semi-OT: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Discussion Thread 

Post#143 » by JulesWinnfield » Mon Apr 13, 2020 10:39 pm

Regarding the 1,200 stimulus check... my wife explained to me today that this is merely an advancement of next years tax return and not really string-free money. Meaning on next years tax return you would get 1,200 less (or have to pay 1,200 more), example being if you were otherwise supposed to get 1,500 you would only get 300. Is this true?
MotownMadness
RealGM
Posts: 38,756
And1: 22,819
Joined: Oct 08, 2013
   

Re: Semi-OT: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Discussion Thread 

Post#144 » by MotownMadness » Mon Apr 13, 2020 10:46 pm

JulesWinnfield wrote:Regarding the 1,200 stimulus check... my wife explained to me today that this is merely an advancement of next years tax return and not really string-free money. Meaning on next years tax return you would get 1,200 less (or have to pay 1,200 more), example being if you were otherwise supposed to get 1,500 you would only get 300. Is this true?

I doubt it, its tax free money right?
michaelm
RealGM
Posts: 12,173
And1: 5,221
Joined: Apr 06, 2010
 

Re: Semi-OT: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Discussion Thread 

Post#145 » by michaelm » Mon Apr 13, 2020 10:46 pm

Zenzibar wrote:
michaelm wrote:
Zenzibar wrote:
Got you. Appreciate your response MichaelM.

The other thing I should have mentioned is that influenza is of course already endemic in the general Australian community and in Western nations in general, with pretty much everyone having had past exposure to some variety/varieties of that virus.


Got you. Also just wanted to confirm that what I stated was not that the said vaccine batches are different depending countries (developed/underdeveloped). But that the vaccine batches here are different and are applied depending on the type of medical insurance you have. Like a you get what you paid for distribution.

Yes, I forget the differences between the Australian and US medical systems. Certainly not based on health insurance status here.
JulesWinnfield
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,825
And1: 6,483
Joined: Mar 24, 2013
Location: NY
   

Re: Semi-OT: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Discussion Thread 

Post#146 » by JulesWinnfield » Mon Apr 13, 2020 10:49 pm

MotownMadness wrote:
JulesWinnfield wrote:Regarding the 1,200 stimulus check... my wife explained to me today that this is merely an advancement of next years tax return and not really string-free money. Meaning on next years tax return you would get 1,200 less (or have to pay 1,200 more), example being if you were otherwise supposed to get 1,500 you would only get 300. Is this true?

I doubt it, its tax free money right?


I was under that impression too. I dont know. She saw a segment on the news where this was being broken down and told me that they were describing the setup the way i outlined it above
MotownMadness
RealGM
Posts: 38,756
And1: 22,819
Joined: Oct 08, 2013
   

Re: Semi-OT: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Discussion Thread 

Post#147 » by MotownMadness » Mon Apr 13, 2020 10:53 pm

JulesWinnfield wrote:
MotownMadness wrote:
JulesWinnfield wrote:Regarding the 1,200 stimulus check... my wife explained to me today that this is merely an advancement of next years tax return and not really string-free money. Meaning on next years tax return you would get 1,200 less (or have to pay 1,200 more), example being if you were otherwise supposed to get 1,500 you would only get 300. Is this true?

I doubt it, its tax free money right?


I was under that impression too. I dont know. She saw a segment on the news where this was being broken down and told me that they were describing the setup the way i outlined it above

Hmm, let me know if you end up finding out for sure
dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 50,550
And1: 27,275
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: Semi-OT: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Discussion Thread 

Post#148 » by dhsilv2 » Mon Apr 13, 2020 11:13 pm

MotownMadness wrote:
JulesWinnfield wrote:
MotownMadness wrote:I doubt it, its tax free money right?


I was under that impression too. I dont know. She saw a segment on the news where this was being broken down and told me that they were describing the setup the way i outlined it above

Hmm, let me know if you end up finding out for sure


It isn't an advance and it isn't taxable.

https://money.com/stimulus-check-advance-tax-refund/
Triples333
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,786
And1: 3,672
Joined: Sep 05, 2016

Re: Semi-OT: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Discussion Thread 

Post#149 » by Triples333 » Mon Apr 13, 2020 11:15 pm

JulesWinnfield wrote:
MotownMadness wrote:
JulesWinnfield wrote:Regarding the 1,200 stimulus check... my wife explained to me today that this is merely an advancement of next years tax return and not really string-free money. Meaning on next years tax return you would get 1,200 less (or have to pay 1,200 more), example being if you were otherwise supposed to get 1,500 you would only get 300. Is this true?

I doubt it, its tax free money right?


I was under that impression too. I dont know. She saw a segment on the news where this was being broken down and told me that they were describing the setup the way i outlined it above

Entirely not true. She probably fell for something she saw on Facebook.

Regarding their delivery, most major banks and credit unions should have it in the next 2 days (many already do), so if you have your bank account linked to your IRS forms, you will get it shortly. If you don't have an account hooked up, it is going to be quite a while as they are apparently sending out 5 million a week starting in 2-3 weeks (lowest incomes getting theirs first for the mail outs).

I'll be curious if people start getting their $600 UI boosts with their claims tomorrow though.
User avatar
HollowEarth
Starter
Posts: 2,038
And1: 2,112
Joined: Feb 19, 2017
 

Re: Semi-OT: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Discussion Thread 

Post#150 » by HollowEarth » Tue Apr 14, 2020 1:22 am

Two small studies on anti-malarial drugs have found the drugs to be of minimal help, and also to cause serious heart complications. Both studies included patients that were already sick enough to be hospitalized.

Chloroquine is similar to hydroxychloroquine, the drug Trump has repeatedly touted. Health experts have insisted that not enough is known about either drug to determine its efficacy in combating COVID-19.

The Brazilian study included 81 hospitalized patients, with about half being given a dose of 50 milligrams of chloroquine twice daily for five days. The other participants were prescribed a dose of 600 milligrams for 10 days.

Patients taking higher doses experienced heart arrhythmias, or improper beating of the heart, within three days, according to the study. Eleven patients died by the sixth day of treatment and caused the research on high-dosages to end.

https://thehill.com/policy/international/492460-small-chloroquine-study-stopped-after-irregular-heart-beats-detected-in

At the time of treatment initiation, 10/11 had fever and received nasal oxygen therapy. Within
5 days, one patient died, two were transferred to the ICU. In one patient, hydroxychloroquine
and azithromycin were discontinued after 4 days because of a prolongation of the QT interval

from 405 ms before treatment to 460 and 470 ms under the combination. Mean through
blood concentration of hydroxychloroquine was 678 ng/mL (range: 381-891) at days 3-7 after
treatment initiation.

Repeated nasopharyngeal swabs in 10 patients (not done in the patient who died) using a
qualitative PCR assay (nucleic acid extraction using Nuclisens Easy Mag®, Biomerieux and
amplification with RealStar SARS CoV-2®, Altona), were still positive for SARS-CoV2 RNA in
8/10 patients
(80%, 95% confidence interval: 49-94) at days 5 to 6 after treatment initiation.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0399077X20300858?via%3Dihub

The study in New York that includes using anti-malarial drugs on people with the coronavirus who are less sick is still ongoing:
The NYU Langone Medical School is conducting ten different trials of potential coronavirus therapies. One of them is evaluating whether hydroxychloroquine can prevent people exposed to the novel coronavirus from getting sick. That study began last week, according to officials.

[ . . .]

"Participants will take the drug hydroyxycloroquine for 14 days and we ask them to stay in the study for 28 days so we can follow them a little after they've taken the drug,” said Dr. Anna Bershteyn, a co-principal investigator for NYU Langone said.

https://www.ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/news/2020/04/07/new-clinical-trials-underway-to-treat-coronavirus-patients
nymets1
Head Coach
Posts: 6,671
And1: 1,353
Joined: Apr 18, 2004
Location: Florida
     

Re: Semi-OT: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Discussion Thread 

Post#151 » by nymets1 » Tue Apr 14, 2020 1:45 am

They overreact with people potentially catching the virus at an outdoor sporting event or any activity outdoors. The issue is indoor places where fresh air doesn't come in and the bad air can't escape. I can understand being at an indoor basketball or an indoor hockey game when your indoors. But Football, baseball, golf and tennis are played outdoors where fresh air is always available and any bad air goes up into the sky away from people possibly being infected. The only indoor area at an outdoor sporting event is the restrooms but we can still social distance in the restrooms if need be.

But we do need to get the economy/country back up and try to get as many things back to normal. Things like dining in at a restaurant that should come back right now. But large gatherings shouldn't comeback yet. I think Gym's can re-open like LA fitness that I go to. It would be great to get LA fitness back and compete with people on the basketball court. I need to get back LA fitness, bodysurfing, dining in at restaurant, sporting events.
"Bodysurfing and always drive with the windows down"

"UCF 2017 only undefeated national champions"
GTR11
RealGM
Posts: 10,310
And1: 2,847
Joined: Jan 17, 2019

Re: Semi-OT: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Discussion Thread 

Post#152 » by GTR11 » Tue Apr 14, 2020 1:59 am

nymets1 wrote:They overreact with people potentially catching the virus at an outdoor sporting event or any activity outdoors. The issue is indoor places where fresh air doesn't come in and the bad air can't escape. I can understand being at an indoor basketball or an indoor hockey game when your indoors. But Football, baseball, golf and tennis are played outdoors where fresh air is always available and any bad air goes up into the sky away from people possibly being infected. The only indoor area at an outdoor sporting event is the restrooms but we can still social distance in the restrooms if need be.

But we do need to get the economy/country back up and try to get as many things back to normal. Things like dining in at a restaurant that should come back right now. But large gatherings shouldn't comeback yet. I think Gym's can re-open like LA fitness that I go to. It would be great to get LA fitness back and compete with people on the basketball court. I need to get back LA fitness, bodysurfing, dining in at restaurant, sporting events.


As of right now we got 4% death rate in NY and that's with people being isolated in home for the most part. You really want to let people out? Do you understand what you talking about?
Capitalistic economy always has defaults and crisis at some point of a tenure. It's just this time around, this economic bubble that been created by government with all the consumption came to the point it was unsustainable to cover. Sending out people to work ain't solving the main issue. All it does is, it kills working class people who drive economy. If anything you commiting mass genocide. You know how expensive and hard to create quality working class?
Warriors Analyst
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,872
And1: 2,707
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Semi-OT: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Discussion Thread 

Post#153 » by Warriors Analyst » Tue Apr 14, 2020 2:03 am

nymets1 wrote:They overreact with people potentially catching the virus at an outdoor sporting event or any activity outdoors. The issue is indoor places where fresh air doesn't come in and the bad air can't escape. I can understand being at an indoor basketball or an indoor hockey game when your indoors. But Football, baseball, golf and tennis are played outdoors where fresh air is always available and any bad air goes up into the sky away from people possibly being infected. The only indoor area at an outdoor sporting event is the restrooms but we can still social distance in the restrooms if need be.

But we do need to get the economy/country back up and try to get as many things back to normal. Things like dining in at a restaurant that should come back right now. But large gatherings shouldn't comeback yet. I think Gym's can re-open like LA fitness that I go to. It would be great to get LA fitness back and compete with people on the basketball court. I need to get back LA fitness, bodysurfing, dining in at restaurant, sporting events.


Care to expand on your theory of “bad air” magically goes up into the sky? I cannot for the life of me comprehend why you think that gyms should reopen. Gyms are a place where people are sweating, touching equipment constantly, and in proximity to other people. Your post is filled with so many atrocious and unfounded ideas, it’s hard to believe.
User avatar
SactoKingsFan
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,236
And1: 2,760
Joined: Mar 15, 2014
       

Re: Semi-OT: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Discussion Thread 

Post#154 » by SactoKingsFan » Tue Apr 14, 2020 2:17 am

nymets1 wrote:They overreact with people potentially catching the virus at an outdoor sporting event or any activity outdoors. The issue is indoor places where fresh air doesn't come in and the bad air can't escape. I can understand being at an indoor basketball or an indoor hockey game when your indoors. But Football, baseball, golf and tennis are played outdoors where fresh air is always available and any bad air goes up into the sky away from people possibly being infected. The only indoor area at an outdoor sporting event is the restrooms but we can still social distance in the restrooms if need be.

But we do need to get the economy/country back up and try to get as many things back to normal. Things like dining in at a restaurant that should come back right now. But large gatherings shouldn't comeback yet. I think Gym's can re-open like LA fitness that I go to. It would be great to get LA fitness back and compete with people on the basketball court. I need to get back LA fitness, bodysurfing, dining in at restaurant, sporting events.


Large gatherings shouldn't come back but you want outdoor sporting events and other outdoor events back? Those are large gatherings on a much bigger scale. Coachella and other festivals are outdoor events. That doesn't mean it's a good idea to schedule these festivals for any time soon just because you have a hunch about fresh air.

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk
User avatar
azcatz11
RealGM
Posts: 31,188
And1: 34,927
Joined: Apr 13, 2017
Location: Phoenix
     

Re: Semi-OT: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Discussion Thread 

Post#155 » by azcatz11 » Tue Apr 14, 2020 2:17 am

The gyms shouldn't re-open but I do agree all other businesses should on May 1st with social distancing fully enforced.
Praying for Burrow
Pennebaker
Head Coach
Posts: 7,027
And1: 5,587
Joined: Nov 02, 2013

Re: Semi-OT: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Discussion Thread 

Post#156 » by Pennebaker » Tue Apr 14, 2020 2:20 am

Triples333 wrote:
JulesWinnfield wrote:
MotownMadness wrote:I doubt it, its tax free money right?


I was under that impression too. I dont know. She saw a segment on the news where this was being broken down and told me that they were describing the setup the way i outlined it above

Entirely not true. She probably fell for something she saw on Facebook.


It looks like it is true, according to the Tax Foundation:

Image
Image
User avatar
goodboy
RealGM
Posts: 46,507
And1: 185,333
Joined: Aug 07, 2014
Location: disposal japanese worker
 

Re: Semi-OT: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Discussion Thread 

Post#157 » by goodboy » Tue Apr 14, 2020 2:22 am

azcatz11 wrote:The gyms shouldn't re-open but I do agree all other businesses should on May 1st with social distancing fully enforced.

This.

Gym's would be notorious for the spread, idk why that dude said LA fitness etc should be open wth.

Buy gym equipment, 2nd hand, wipe em down and or buy commercial if you have the cash flow and youre good.
Bright
User avatar
azcatz11
RealGM
Posts: 31,188
And1: 34,927
Joined: Apr 13, 2017
Location: Phoenix
     

Re: Semi-OT: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Discussion Thread 

Post#158 » by azcatz11 » Tue Apr 14, 2020 2:33 am

goodboy wrote:
azcatz11 wrote:The gyms shouldn't re-open but I do agree all other businesses should on May 1st with social distancing fully enforced.

This.

Gym's would be notorious for the spread, idk why that dude said LA fitness etc should be open wth.

Buy gym equipment, 2nd hand, wipe em down and or buy commercial if you have the cash flow and youre good.


Yep...or go for a jog. Or a bike ride...we're going to have to open businesses eventually. I was at Home Depot this afternoon and everyone was seriously respecting social distancing and the reps were wiping down self service kiosks. This can literally be implemented everywhere.
Praying for Burrow
User avatar
rapstarter
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,377
And1: 5,906
Joined: Feb 01, 2017
     

Re: Semi-OT: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Discussion Thread 

Post#159 » by rapstarter » Tue Apr 14, 2020 2:35 am

Pennebaker wrote:
Triples333 wrote:
JulesWinnfield wrote:
I was under that impression too. I dont know. She saw a segment on the news where this was being broken down and told me that they were describing the setup the way i outlined it above

Entirely not true. She probably fell for something she saw on Facebook.


It looks like it is true, according to the Tax Foundation:

Image


It's a free tax credit of $1200 you otherwise wouldn't have gotten. Read the last paragraph - it will only work in your favor, and you won't be taxed more because of it. It's set up this way so that people who are not eligible for the check based on their 2019 (or 2018) income can still remain eligible based on their 2020 income (which will be reported as a part of the 2020 tax return next year).
Triples333
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,786
And1: 3,672
Joined: Sep 05, 2016

Re: Semi-OT: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Discussion Thread 

Post#160 » by Triples333 » Tue Apr 14, 2020 2:41 am

rapstarter wrote:
Pennebaker wrote:
Triples333 wrote:Entirely not true. She probably fell for something she saw on Facebook.


It looks like it is true, according to the Tax Foundation:

Image


It's a free tax credit of $1200 you otherwise wouldn't have gotten. Read the last paragraph - it will only work in your favor, and you won't be taxed more because of it.

This.

Nothing is taken out of money you would have otherwise gotten or will get. The only discrepancy is that if you made over 75K, you will only receive a portion of the $1200 (at 100K+ I believe you get nothing).

Return to The General Board