100proof wrote:bucknersrevenge wrote:100proof wrote:Vassell would be a terrible pick at the memphis spot.
1 dimensional player, poor defense, cannot create shot, cannot create for others.
And another sg/sf type of player. He would be behind jaylen, hayward, tatum, smart, romeo at a minimum.
Memphis pick will be a pg with the pitential to replace kemba.
Boston pick will be one of the many wings available
Bucks pick, if smith falls, will be for him.
I will be shocked if ramsay is not a celtic next season. Team may look to move smart to backup pg with ramsay at sg changing their options at the memphis pick, but I cannot see that making vassell the target there.
I thinks its either nesmith or maledon at 17. (Theo is backup plan if nesmith is gone)
Then Ramsay at 26.
Williams, smith or bey at 30
Nobody is worried about replacing Kemba when he is in year 1 of a 4-year deal. Hell, he could get extended after that or they could sign someone else. The problem with this draft is, nobody we could draft at 17 will even sniff a spot over any of the current group of talent we have. And if we're worried about replacing anyone, Smart may end up the next person on that list before Walker.
I completely disagree.
The talent level of a couple of the pgs in the middle of this draft has massive potential. The reason they are lower in the draft is they need a couple years.
So the draft if for a better backup now, withe the potential to rwplace kemba in a couple of years.
Guarantee is nonexistant that kemba last 3 seasons healthwise, fits the team in 3 years, wants to bebon the team in 2 years or ever even resigns.
You take the player with the best potential and groom them like your top players may not be available.
Its the reason they chose romeo.
TBH, I can't see a potential Starting Caliber PG, at the #17 Draft slot.
For the time being though, Kemba will be age 30 by the time play resumes, and Smart (as a Super 6th-Man) is 26.
Follow those two, by Tremont Waters as a legit PG at 22 yrs old.
Romeo Langford could become a Starter, but Not at PG.
In any event, I believe that a (future) Starting Caliber PG needs to be Drafted in the Top 10.
While it is possible to get someone get outside of the Top 10, like a Rondo (at #21), it's highly unlikely.
Also, an Isaiah Thomas doesn't come around too often (Drafted at #60).
And even then, would likely Not be Starting Caliber for more than a couple of years.
No. I think it's best to go with who we currently have, waiting in the wings.
We do need to add another PG to the Depth Chart, in a year or so, though. But, not immediately.
Proposed Rotation, 2020-21:Kemba - Brown - Tatum - (XXXX) - Theis
Waters - Smart - Langford - G.Williams - Kanter/R.Williams
(Rookie) - Edwards - Poirier - Fall
Maine Red Claws = (Rookie), (Rookie)
__________________________________________
Or,
Proposed Rotation, 2020-21:Kemba - Smart - Brown - Tatum - Theis
Waters - Edwards - Langford - G.Williams - R.Williams/(Kanter)
(Rookie) - (Rookie) - Poirier - Fall
Maine Red Claws = (Rookie), (Rookie)