god shammgod wrote:if you start your draft assessment with "he'll never be a star but" what is the point ? you don't try to find role players with high lottery picks. even if who you draft isn't enough of a star to win it all, maybe he's good enough to make your team decent so you attract that guy/guys. unless you draft someone who can carry an offense for a decent amount of wins, you're gonna keep signing the julius randles of this world because someone has to take on the scoring load and the big names won't come do it if you suck. if you're not reaching for someone who at least could possibly be a star, i don't even understand.
who has superstar potential that we can pick at 6th? Let me also add that I think Haliburton will be better than any available point guard outside of LaMelo.
I get it though, I don’t mind swinging for the fences when it’s actually a player worth swinging for, but this is also how you end up with Knox over SGA.






























