RHODEY wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:75,000 deaths. That's with social distancing. It's a curve, so guess what? That means 75,000 deaths on the come down. Or did we all forget how curves work? Take away NYC, and the country hasn't even flattened it's curve and in fact is still rising. I figure we make it to 250,000 deaths easy.
https://erinbromage.wixsite.com/covid19/post/the-risks-know-them-avoid-them. Enjoy all the death!
And thats just the first wave...get ready for winter and the flu season....
Absolutely.
In any event, to the extent any individual on here might be able to control their circumstances, the link has some data and examples on the situations where the disease is more likely to spread.
So, one is a workplace where people are somewhat concentrated. A cube farm/call center is an obviously bad place. I'd guess traditional trading floors wouldn't be too outstanding either.
Restaurants can definitely be problematic.
Shopping at supermarket has low risk, but not "no" risk for shoppers, but risky for the workers.
Churches and places of worship are straight up a BAD idea. I know I wont set foot in one for at least another year.
Social gathering like birthdays and funerals are top everyday social situations for spreading the disease.
Welp, regardless of the various feelings around civil liberties, without widespread testing and contact tracing, this country is going to have issues. Since we have neither, nor have I heard of a plan for one, along with the government not really systematically dealing with people's employment issues, between massive returns to work and substandard testing and tracking, lots of Americans are going to die. I mean, a lot already have. Just a significant amount more.
Would people have died anyway? Yes. Would the economy have taken a hit anyway? Yes?
Could the federal government been more organized and proactive in it's response to lessen both? Well, I think it's pretty clear you have to be drinking a special kind of cool-aid to think they've done a good job.