Dresden wrote:The administration's directives to our intel agencies to pursue the escaped from a lab in Wuhan hypothesis echoes back strongly to 2001, when George Bush's administration sought evidence linking Saddam to 911, and later, to link Saddam's regime to the pursuit of WMD's. Thus, we were given the bogus "intel" reports that Saddam was trying to buy yellow cake from Nigeria, that he was importing centrifuges for refining nuclear material, that he was operating a bio weapons lab, that he was testing missiles capable of delivering a nuclear warhead long range, and on and on. Very dangerous things happen when a president directs the intelligence community to try to find evidence to support a conclusion.
The worst thing about it is that Donald Trump engages in “word salad.”
Essentially rambles in long, unbroken, incoherent sentences. Folks point out the BS. His followers pick up the fight and exacerbate it into 10x worse.
Trump shrugs and says “Well I didn’t mean that!” - “Sarcasm!” - “Media spun my little tweet out of proportion!” - “See I told you! Liberals are looking for a fight!”
At least W and Dick were pretty clear in their justifications, accusations and used proper governmental procedure, until it was proven that they essentially lied and/or presented fake/unreliable intel. Trump fore-goes all procedure and says whatever is on his mind with zero public courtesy. There is zero difference between Trump’s style and Kim Jong Un, Putin, Duterte. The only difference is we have 230 Representatives, 45 Senators, 4 Supreme Justices pushing back, along with 24 governors and a more complicated distribution of checks and balances.
























