Deeeez Knicks wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:Deeeez Knicks wrote:
Yea, that was a pretty good article. It sounds like there are going to be some opportunities to take on some contracts for picks/assets. A bunch of teams are going to be in trouble with the tax and looking to avoid or reduce there tax. Knicks can be one of the teams to jump on those opportunities
The Warriors dangle the #1 pick but you have to take back Wiggins' contract. If you are the Knicks, you do it?
I guess this is unrealistic. But would you, in this imaginary scenario?
Hypothetically, Wiggins + #1 for nothing? I would probably do that. That contract is bad, but its hard to pass up the #1 pick while keeping our own. For LaMelo I would probably take that contract. Not sure I would do that for anyone else in the draft.
Not really sure GS is thinking. They are gonna owe a ton of tax, but put themselves in that position so maybe they are ok or have a plan.
I don’t think they planned to trade Wiggins but that tax, plus the reality of lower revenue..... I could see them trading him. 135 mil in just luxury tax..... that’s insane.






















