3toheadmelo wrote:mpharris36 wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Donovan Mitchell another guy who was thought to have a low ceiling. You never know with these guys.
At the range we are picking in, especially in a weak draft, Haliburton seems like a good pick imo. I see the arguments for someone like Hayes though, but even he has his flaws like Haliburton as well.
lot of good points here. This draft is very interesting because you can make a case for nearly anyone and every single prospect has some glaring weaknesses. Depends on what you like and what you think they can become in the NBA.
I would say Mtichell had the athleticism he just had concerns about being a combo guard that shot a pretty low % in college with not so great pg skills. Kinda like where was he gong to fit, but he really thrived with more NBA spacing and his athleticism shined.
I think Haliburton is actually very skilled. He's just lacks that pop and NBA frame that could prevent him reaching a ceiling that some other prospects might get too. And nothing is wrong with that because he can play and he will be a very good pro.
I think I just read that he wants to put on 10-12 lbs. That should help.
If he ever improves his handle, then he’ll be super good. He checks off all the other boxes that I want in a guard.
Even if he doesn’t end up as a star and ends up as a Lonzo/Brogdon type player then I would still be pretty happy.
I would love that, however that might not be possible with his frame though. He is very much built like Shaun Livingston...those guys rarely can put on significant amount of weight. He checks off a lot of boxes for sure. As a main facilitator and ball handler...I just don't see it. That also doesn't mean he won't be good and that doesn't mean I wouldn't take him. Just being realistic of what he does well even with improved handle.



























