mpharris36 wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:mpharris36 wrote:
i mean I'll give a little bit of pass to lavine because the bulls are bad and Lauri had a bad year.
BUt the suns have no excuse to be bad. Booker, Ayton had a really good year, Oubre was good, Bridges/Rubio/Baynes are solid role players. There is no reason memphis is a 500 taem and the Suns are 13 games under if you just look at from a talent perspective.
And if Booker wants to be considered one of the best players he simply needs to start winning more.
I mean look at the Suns roster and the Utah roster...can you honestly tell me if you consider Mitch and Booker a wash. Does utah really have that much better of a roster?
I think its because Utah's best player has more of an impact than the suns best player.
Ayton was out for majority of the season and there was a lot of injuries on that team. That’s why they lost a lot of games. Their starting lineup still has the best net rating in the league. Pretty impressive considering that their the youngest team in the whole league. They just need to stay healthy and improve their bench. This same Suns team blew out Utah by 20 points. If Ayton never got suspended and hurt they would def be an 8th seed team or better. They played like a 43 win team with him on the court.
Utah has always been one of the best ran franchises in the league since before Mitchell got there. Literally won 51 games the season before they drafted him. Let’s not act like he’s carrying them and he’s the only reason why their winning. Dude has a great roster around him and is playing for one of the best coaches in the league. Mitchell is really good but he choked hard in the playoffs last year too. He is in the same tier as Booker and LaVine for me.
They were 14-21 without ayton (40% winning %)
They were 12-18 with ayton (40% winning %)
Its not a specific knock on booker or lavine types. They are good players. But there is a reason that young guys like Mitchell and Tatum win more games. They are more well rounded players.
Thats pretty meaningless considering that they brought back Ayton slowly, had him coming off the bench and was experimenting with different lineups.
Ayton off the court suns net rating is 22nd best in league. Ayton on the court is tied for 12 best in the league. Massive difference.
Since were are mainly talking about Booker I’ll even tell you what it is for Booker
Booker off the court: 26th best team in the league
Booker on the court: 14th best team in league. So he also has a massive effect on the team.
You really haven’t said anything to dispute the fact that the Jazz was winning games before Mitchell got there. 51 games won in the season prior they drafted him and have not won 51 games or more since. They have a great roster around him and is playing under one of the best coaches in the league. And I don’t recall Mitchell doing anything in last years playoffs. He was terrible. Who’s fault is that.
You can even say the same for Tatum, who I love. They are maximizing the strengths for them while having the perfect pieces around them to make them successful.
Still the fact remains that Mitchell is not some tier above Booker and LaVine. All great young players while 2 of them were under unfortunate circumstances for most of their careers while Mitchell was drafted to a winning team.