SNPA wrote:pipfan wrote:I run a school with about 100 teachers. We are online now, but in August we will be back on campus. If a teacher says "even with the safety precautions, I don't feel safe in returning" I would find a new teacher and let that one go. Sorry, but that's the way it is. Why are these guys different?
If that teacher had co-morbidities and/or was 65+ you'd be acting like an ass and likely get sued into oblivious and lose.
I don’t know about the lawsuit thing. If something is an essential job function you can’t be sued for not hiring or firing people who can’t or won’t do it.
And I don’t think “being at a higher risk of having serious complications to a virus that you may or may not catch in the future” counts as a disability under the Americans w/ Disabilities Act. You can’t claim a disability for something that might happen.
I guess someone will eventually get fired and some lawyer will pick up the case and sue and it may go to the Supreme Court, but I just don’t see how the economy can function w/ that type of thing being allowed.
Basically every company that needs workers physically there to do their job now has to just pay anyone who is old or has an underlying health condition to stay home for free? For as long as they say they are afraid? No way.
And good luck finding anyone to hire those types of individuals if the threat of them doing that (suing to stay home for free) doesn’t get nipped in the bud real fast.


























