E-Balla wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:E-Balla wrote:Peaceful protests have accomplished nothing in the history of America. **** started burning and now all of a sudden everyone that spent the last 5 years saying they didn't understand how change could be made are finally doing those things.
A store is inconsequential. Who cares about property?
Your concept of harm is conceptual then. Property destruction is inconsequential to you, but not to those affected by it.
Go tell that to the man or woman who invested thirty years of their life in a community store that was burned down and see if they think it was justified or if they believe you have any respect for them.
Everyone's concept of harm is conceptual. To many the idea of claiming you own land as property is harm. I will tell that to anyone that needs to hear it to their face that their store burning was a necessary means to an end that will benefit them.
Stores can be rebuilt, they have insurance, shut up and enjoy the social change that the burning of a collection of rocks brought you. Like honestly I can't believe its 2020 and we're still acting like a collection of bricks matters in the fight for change.
You complain about the GB, then use this board to tell someone who supports equality, but differs on the means, to shut up. I disagree with you, but I'm not going to bully you to make my point.
Just dismissing property rights as trivial and subordinate to racial equality makes it sound like you don't even believe ownership of material goods is a human right at all. One does not negate the other and justify robbing people of their livelihoods.
And your certainty that looting is the reason why white folk are all of a sudden changing their tune is a crude and inaccurate take on the situation. If your claim to historical truth were on the money then past riots would have shifted social consciousness to a more receptive state, but it didn't.
The difference is the times, the ability to communicate in social media over the past decade, the accumulation of documentation of police violence culminating in Floyd's death which became a tipping point. It was becoming harder to put the racial violence back into the bottle once it was exposed that much in broad daylight.
Based on your premise, looting is the tipping point. If that were true, then your assertion is somehow consensus reality has changed because of FEAR, fear of being burned out and attacked by looters. FALSE. If you actually believe fear is what turned public opinion around then you're seriously misguided.
What changed it is the dialogue around race has been progressing for a while now, but the resistance to hearing it by power elites is driven by social pressure, whether that is by political voting, by cancelling advertisers of shows by bigots, by millions on Facebook or Twitter communicating where they stand and by those people showing up in diversity to demonstrate they no longer support the kind of oppression that can be pointed at directly and identified as wrong, whether that is police violence or prisons for profit or institutionalized forms of segregation or limits on opportunities for advancement.
It was moving towards that tipping point for a while now and the cops killing Floyd like it was a TV show and then Trump adding gasoline to the fire were the straws that broke the camel's back. But if you think looting convinced anybody that oppression is wrong then you're justifying YOUR feelings, but you are not explaining the reasons why millions of people who were not previously engaged in this conversation now are. They are not finally agreeing that BLM because they are afraid of being burned down.
They're also agreeing because their eyes are opened that if they let things go any further in the wrong direction the whole society will be lost to violent police rule. If you want to be cynical, then that is a more realistic explanation as to why there is some solidarity that wasn't there before, because when privileged people see they are not safe from the police either then they start to understand why black people aren't. It humanizes their perspective even if it comes from a place of self-interest of not wanting to live in a police state.
Yes, that is fear, but it is not fear of looters, it is a fear that the police are no longer law enforcement officers, but state sanctioned gangs. That's what a lot of people saw when the protests started and the cops around the country were equal opportunity sadists, regardless of race. That turned the tide as much as anything. A black person probably already felt that way about the cops. Now tens of millions of whites saw that and went oh chit that's what you've been dealing with, damn, this can't continue. That's what super-charged the conversation, not looters.
But, in general, it is not that cynical. If a white person is marching now they're damned relieved to be out there showing their support after so many years of tension and social repression.