Thread: Kids, mini vans, name analysis that's not Kofi Cockburn.

Moderators: j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36



Manhattan Project wrote:Me: New responses in this thread, maybe something happened, a trade perhaps.
Thread: Kids, mini vans, name analysis that's not Kofi Cockburn.

K-DOT wrote:Manhattan Project wrote:Me: New responses in this thread, maybe something happened, a trade perhaps.
Thread: Kids, mini vans, name analysis that's not Kofi Cockburn.
Trade might've happened behind the scenes
Manhattan Project wrote:K-DOT wrote:Manhattan Project wrote:Me: New responses in this thread, maybe something happened, a trade perhaps.
Thread: Kids, mini vans, name analysis that's not Kofi Cockburn.
Trade might've happened behind the scenes
Lakers making a trade excites me as much as the Knicks signing Theo Pinson, I look forward to being proven wrong hopefully.


Context wrote:Manhattan Project wrote:K-DOT wrote:Trade might've happened behind the scenes
Lakers making a trade excites me as much as the Knicks signing Theo Pinson, I look forward to being proven wrong hopefully.
Dot and I did the big one!
Manhattan Project wrote:Context wrote:Manhattan Project wrote:
Lakers making a trade excites me as much as the Knicks signing Theo Pinson, I look forward to being proven wrong hopefully.
Dot and I did the big one!
I think the biggest deal you two could do is a Gordon for Monk and an incentive type deal.


Manhattan Project wrote:Context wrote:Manhattan Project wrote:
Lakers making a trade excites me as much as the Knicks signing Theo Pinson, I look forward to being proven wrong hopefully.
Dot and I did the big one!
I think the biggest deal you two could do is a Gordon for Monk and an incentive type deal.

Context wrote:Manhattan Project wrote:Context wrote:Dot and I did the big one!
I think the biggest deal you two could do is a Gordon for Monk and an incentive type deal.
just curious...how did you come to that theory MP?

Manhattan Project wrote:Context wrote:Manhattan Project wrote:
I think the biggest deal you two could do is a Gordon for Monk and an incentive type deal.
just curious...how did you come to that theory MP?
Lakers were looking to move Monk and pick 22.
You put out for assets, no matter how big or small.
Just seemed logical.


K-DOT wrote:Pretty close. Only difference is, I didn't actually give up any picks
In unrelated news, Eric Gordon is on the block


Context wrote:K-DOT wrote:Pretty close. Only difference is, I didn't actually give up any picks
In unrelated news, Eric Gordon is on the block
I was certain you told him about the deal until he gave that explanation...that was as good as perfect as far as im concerned

K-DOT wrote:Context wrote:K-DOT wrote:Pretty close. Only difference is, I didn't actually give up any picks
In unrelated news, Eric Gordon is on the block
I was certain you told him about the deal until he gave that explanation...that was as good as perfect as far as im concerned
Why would I talk to somebody about a deal I'm in the process of with someone else.


K-DOT wrote:Pretty close. Only difference is, I didn't actually give up any picks
In unrelated news, Eric Gordon is on the block
NewEra wrote:We’re hearing rumblings around the league that Portland’s GM Smash and Eric Gordon have mutual interest.![]()
In other News, What is Context doing???![]()
![]()


Context wrote:NewEra wrote:We’re hearing rumblings around the league that Portland’s GM Smash and Eric Gordon have mutual interest.![]()
In other News, What is Context doing???![]()
Spoiler:Spoiler:


mpharris36 wrote:K-DOT wrote:Pretty close. Only difference is, I didn't actually give up any picks
In unrelated news, Eric Gordon is on the block
if you moved the coke head for an expiring kudos to you

