bringbackhoffa wrote:i think the bigger issue was good players being DNPd in favor of guys who would not see a lick of playing time in real life (and in some cases were not even on active NBA rosters)
i agree that is an issue and still wont stop someone from playing 1-star player over a 3-star player. But I don't think we can get into that dynamic where we are telling who to play based off ratings. In some instances a 2-star player might be better suited for a specific role than a 3-star.
So while I agree with you that say playing a d-leaguer over an established 3-star vet probably wouldn't happen in real life I don't think you can impose a play guys by there better rating rule. You just have to hope people try to be as competitive as possible even if they have a bad roster. For the good of the game.
At least what this proposed rule is suggesting is taking away the ridiculous lineup that would never ever be a legit option. Like Tacko Fall isn't going to be running PG in the NBA. Sorry Tacko but the SIM will try to run him there and he will turn it over 20 times. That seems ridiculous to me.
And its not limiting your roster if you have a case for playing a player outside of the position. For example to Deeeez point if you truly believe this is the right move for your team. You won't have an issue getting it approved.
So its really not limiting anyone but someone trying to lose.