ImageImageImageImageImage

Democratic Primary Thread: The Deuce

Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, dakomish23, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, HerSports85

HarthorneWingo
RealGM
Posts: 97,546
And1: 62,686
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Democratic Primary Thread: The Deuce 

Post#1081 » by HarthorneWingo » Thu Aug 13, 2020 4:58 am

BallSacBounce wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
BallSacBounce wrote:Your first paragraph nah, not a chance.

Second paragraph I think your suburban mom is way more interested in personal protection for their family than you think.

Third one, really? You think Antifa is nothing more than a right wing slogan? Who's burning down the buildings and destroying things then? There's like, photo evidence, indictments and stuff.

The fourth paragraph is pure projection. It was Trump that was attacked by security state fascists trying to consolidate their power in place of a duly elected president. I mean really now. You can agree with them if you want but how can you not see they did exactly what you accuse others of. That's hilarious.

Fifth paragraph, whatever.


I respond to you on occasion just to grease the wheels and keep the convo going, but this above response is why I only sometimes click the display button to see what someone on my ignore list is saying. I have to be honest, I've never found anything you have to say remotely grounded in reality and thus that interesting. And I always suspected that anyone who call themselves BallSacBounce is, well, not someone whose opinion I need to take into consideration. I will now only read you if someone replies to you, but I won't respond any longer since it perpetuates you being seen by other people who have you on ignore. Enjoy your alternate reality. Say hi to Q

I was told the same thing in 2016 when I said Trump was going to win, coworkers laughed and mocked and ridiculed me. So I said, let's bet on it. They did, later I laughed at them.

I'll never forget the stunned silence of bubble living people trying to make sense of reality. Sublime, an unbelievably delicious treat.



True but now we actually experienced the “real of the deal.” And it was pretty, pretty, pretty ugly. His complete bungling of his response to the virus, if nothing else, will sink his presidency. Also, he hasn’t accomplished very much of anything to help the middle class. His border wall is a waste of time and money and was done, like most things he pursues, just to soothe his fragile ego. Also the tax cut only served to line the pockets of the uber rich and corporations. Long Island middle class home owners got killed with his cut in the home mortgage interest deduction. And he hasn’t come up with a any new healthcare plan bc all he does is sit around all day in his robe watching Fox News and eating Big Macs. lol

If you see an electoral path for Trump to re-election, then I’d love to see it. But base it on solid poll numbers. Don’t come at me with that weak tea. :lol:
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: Democratic Primary Thread: The Deuce 

Post#1082 » by Clyde_Style » Thu Aug 13, 2020 5:03 am

HarthorneWingo wrote:The DNC is so scared of AOC, it’s only giving her 1 minute to speak.

When there’s a civil war in the Democratic Party, don’t blame us bc clearly the DNC is playing games again in order to protect their fiefdom.

One minute? FOH


That's silly. AOC is probably one of the best speakers in the party at this point. I think they're afraid they'll get the riled up version when AOC is hurling fireballs during congressional debates, but AOC is not stupid and wouldn't give the red meat to the trolls like that. I'm sure she'd deliver a fine speech that would help the Democrats. Oh well, keep pushing the party left. AOC will still be there when things shift.
User avatar
dakomish23
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 58,788
And1: 48,762
Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Location: Empire State
     

Re: Democratic Primary Thread: The Deuce 

Post#1083 » by dakomish23 » Thu Aug 13, 2020 5:37 am

MAGAland is scared out of their mind. Immediately jumped to nuclear birther option.

Not gonna matter. November can’t come fast enough
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor


#FreeJimmit
HarthorneWingo
RealGM
Posts: 97,546
And1: 62,686
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Democratic Primary Thread: The Deuce 

Post#1084 » by HarthorneWingo » Thu Aug 13, 2020 5:40 am

Clyde_Style wrote:
HarthorneWingo wrote:The DNC is so scared of AOC, it’s only giving her 1 minute to speak.

When there’s a civil war in the Democratic Party, don’t blame us bc clearly the DNC is playing games again in order to protect their fiefdom.

One minute? FOH


That's silly. AOC is probably one of the best speakers in the party at this point. I think they're afraid they'll get the riled up version when AOC is hurling fireballs during congressional debates, but AOC is not stupid and wouldn't give the red meat to the trolls like that. I'm sure she'd deliver a fine speech that would help the Democrats. Oh well, keep pushing the party left. AOC will still be there when things shift.


It doesn’t really help bring the Party together as one when we’re about to go to war. I believe she’s even praised Biden’s climate policy. Whatever.
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: Democratic Primary Thread: The Deuce 

Post#1085 » by Clyde_Style » Thu Aug 13, 2020 5:42 am

dakomish23 wrote:MAGAland is scared out of their mind. Immediately jumped to nuclear birther option.

Not gonna matter. November can’t come fast enough


Kamala was born in Oakland which we all know is a radical separatist enclave located within U.S. borders that produces Antifa babies raised from birth to exterminate MAGAts.
Oscirus
RealGM
Posts: 13,530
And1: 9,536
Joined: Dec 09, 2011
       

Re: Democratic Primary Thread: The Deuce 

Post#1086 » by Oscirus » Thu Aug 13, 2020 5:48 am

Clyde_Style wrote:
HarthorneWingo wrote:The DNC is so scared of AOC, it’s only giving her 1 minute to speak.

When there’s a civil war in the Democratic Party, don’t blame us bc clearly the DNC is playing games again in order to protect their fiefdom.

One minute? FOH


That's silly. AOC is probably one of the best speakers in the party at this point. I think they're afraid they'll get the riled up version when AOC is hurling fireballs during congressional debates, but AOC is not stupid and wouldn't give the red meat to the trolls like that. I'm sure she'd deliver a fine speech that would help the Democrats. Oh well, keep pushing the party left. AOC will still be there when things shift.

She should just disregard and go over the minute. I doubt they'd sandman her if she does so.
Jimmit79 wrote:At this point I want RJ to get paid
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: Democratic Primary Thread: The Deuce 

Post#1087 » by Clyde_Style » Thu Aug 13, 2020 5:53 am

Oscirus wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
HarthorneWingo wrote:The DNC is so scared of AOC, it’s only giving her 1 minute to speak.

When there’s a civil war in the Democratic Party, don’t blame us bc clearly the DNC is playing games again in order to protect their fiefdom.

One minute? FOH


That's silly. AOC is probably one of the best speakers in the party at this point. I think they're afraid they'll get the riled up version when AOC is hurling fireballs during congressional debates, but AOC is not stupid and wouldn't give the red meat to the trolls like that. I'm sure she'd deliver a fine speech that would help the Democrats. Oh well, keep pushing the party left. AOC will still be there when things shift.

She should just disregard and go over the minute. I doubt they'd sandman her if she does so.


It's a pre-recorded video so she won't have that option
HarthorneWingo
RealGM
Posts: 97,546
And1: 62,686
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Democratic Primary Thread: The Deuce 

Post#1088 » by HarthorneWingo » Thu Aug 13, 2020 5:56 am

Oscirus wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
HarthorneWingo wrote:The DNC is so scared of AOC, it’s only giving her 1 minute to speak.

When there’s a civil war in the Democratic Party, don’t blame us bc clearly the DNC is playing games again in order to protect their fiefdom.

One minute? FOH


That's silly. AOC is probably one of the best speakers in the party at this point. I think they're afraid they'll get the riled up version when AOC is hurling fireballs during congressional debates, but AOC is not stupid and wouldn't give the red meat to the trolls like that. I'm sure she'd deliver a fine speech that would help the Democrats. Oh well, keep pushing the party left. AOC will still be there when things shift.

She should just disregard and go over the minute. I doubt they'd sandman her if she does so.



Hopefully they change their minds once all the news stories and media buzz starts tomorrow
Oscirus
RealGM
Posts: 13,530
And1: 9,536
Joined: Dec 09, 2011
       

Re: Democratic Primary Thread: The Deuce 

Post#1089 » by Oscirus » Thu Aug 13, 2020 6:00 am

HarthorneWingo wrote:
Oscirus wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
That's silly. AOC is probably one of the best speakers in the party at this point. I think they're afraid they'll get the riled up version when AOC is hurling fireballs during congressional debates, but AOC is not stupid and wouldn't give the red meat to the trolls like that. I'm sure she'd deliver a fine speech that would help the Democrats. Oh well, keep pushing the party left. AOC will still be there when things shift.

She should just disregard and go over the minute. I doubt they'd sandman her if she does so.



Hopefully they change their minds once all the news stories and media buzz starts tomorrow

Doubt it, they're even limiting press passes.

No idea who made that lineup, but if its truncated like they say no idea why they're giving away spots like crazy to the old guard and republicans. No way should kasich be there, nor should Michelle( love her to death but in a time crunch limit it to one obama), should be highlighting the future of the democratic party, not the past.
Jimmit79 wrote:At this point I want RJ to get paid
User avatar
aq_ua
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 21,812
And1: 7,833
Joined: May 08, 2002
Location: Optimistic but realistic

Re: Democratic Primary Thread: The Deuce 

Post#1090 » by aq_ua » Thu Aug 13, 2020 6:04 am

HarthorneWingo wrote:
Oscirus wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
That's silly. AOC is probably one of the best speakers in the party at this point. I think they're afraid they'll get the riled up version when AOC is hurling fireballs during congressional debates, but AOC is not stupid and wouldn't give the red meat to the trolls like that. I'm sure she'd deliver a fine speech that would help the Democrats. Oh well, keep pushing the party left. AOC will still be there when things shift.

She should just disregard and go over the minute. I doubt they'd sandman her if she does so.



Hopefully they change their minds once all the news stories and media buzz starts tomorrow

It's going to be a pre-recorded speech, not live, and undoubtedly will be screened for content. This is operation "no unknown variables" for the DNC. Lots of pressure to not f it up and provide any sort of ammunition to the GOP. To be frank, the Dems might be better off just cancelling the whole DNC and blaming it on the incumbent government's handling of Covid. Sends a stronger message, and they're guaranteed not to provide new content.
HarthorneWingo
RealGM
Posts: 97,546
And1: 62,686
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Democratic Primary Thread: The Deuce 

Post#1091 » by HarthorneWingo » Thu Aug 13, 2020 6:10 am

aq_ua wrote:
HarthorneWingo wrote:
Oscirus wrote:She should just disregard and go over the minute. I doubt they'd sandman her if she does so.



Hopefully they change their minds once all the news stories and media buzz starts tomorrow

It's going to be a pre-recorded speech, not live, and undoubtedly will be screened for content. This is operation "no unknown variables" for the DNC. Lots of pressure to not f it up and provide any sort of ammunition to the GOP. To be frank, the Dems might be better off just cancelling the whole DNC and blaming it on the incumbent government's handling of Covid. Sends a stronger message, and they're guaranteed not to provide new content.


I’m fine with that. How much excitement and enthusiasm can you drum up at a “Convention” with no audience? :lol:
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: Democratic Primary Thread: The Deuce 

Post#1092 » by Clyde_Style » Thu Aug 13, 2020 6:16 am

No one gives a flying donut about conventions right now. Get in and get out and call it a wrap.
HarthorneWingo
RealGM
Posts: 97,546
And1: 62,686
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Democratic Primary Thread: The Deuce 

Post#1093 » by HarthorneWingo » Thu Aug 13, 2020 7:16 am

This was pretty funny

Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: Democratic Primary Thread: The Deuce 

Post#1094 » by Clyde_Style » Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:03 am

Read on Twitter


Schindler is not your run of the mill Twitter gooroo

Trump has been a Russian asset the whole time. Our president is a traitor
BallSacBounce
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,929
And1: 2,411
Joined: Dec 14, 2011

Re: Democratic Primary Thread: The Deuce 

Post#1095 » by BallSacBounce » Thu Aug 13, 2020 10:01 am

HarthorneWingo wrote:
BallSacBounce wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
I respond to you on occasion just to grease the wheels and keep the convo going, but this above response is why I only sometimes click the display button to see what someone on my ignore list is saying. I have to be honest, I've never found anything you have to say remotely grounded in reality and thus that interesting. And I always suspected that anyone who call themselves BallSacBounce is, well, not someone whose opinion I need to take into consideration. I will now only read you if someone replies to you, but I won't respond any longer since it perpetuates you being seen by other people who have you on ignore. Enjoy your alternate reality. Say hi to Q

I was told the same thing in 2016 when I said Trump was going to win, coworkers laughed and mocked and ridiculed me. So I said, let's bet on it. They did, later I laughed at them.

I'll never forget the stunned silence of bubble living people trying to make sense of reality. Sublime, an unbelievably delicious treat.



True but now we actually experienced the “real of the deal.” And it was pretty, pretty, pretty ugly. His complete bungling of his response to the virus, if nothing else, will sink his presidency. Also, he hasn’t accomplished very much of anything to help the middle class. His border wall is a waste of time and money and was done, like most things he pursues, just to soothe his fragile ego. Also the tax cut only served to line the pockets of the uber rich and corporations. Long Island middle class home owners got killed with his cut in the home mortgage interest deduction.

If you see an electoral path for Trump to re-election, then I’d love to it. But base it on solid poll numbers. Don’t come at me with. I Ben Shapiro BS. :lol:

This far out I don't even look at the polls. And when I do start looking at them I'll be paying attention for weighting and bias. That's what I did the last time and that was the fatal mistake for the doubters. They believed their own propaganda.

It should be no surprise at this point but sometimes others see things differently than you. Others see a vibrant economy, prosperous times which helped everyone before the virus and don't hold Trump accountable for the aftermath.

Others appreciate the wall and the sticking up for the American Worker he repeatedly does with the trade deals. Others prefer the law and order he stands for and have no stomach for the disorder and chaos allowed to run roughshod over their lives, believe it or not.

He'll lose New Yorkers? How exactly will that affect his electoral chances?

He will get re-elected. It's not just me saying these things.

Here's what swing voters are saying about Trump:
https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/29/opinions/swing-voters-midwest-trump-support-thau/index.html
And, each month for the past 17 months, I've had a unique window into the Americans largely responsible for giving the president his slim Electoral College victory: so-called "Obama-Trump" swing voters across the upper Midwest.

Our Swing Voter Project has uncovered that many of these people, who live in places such as Canton, Ohio; Davenport, Iowa; Erie, Pennsylvania; and Macomb County, Michigan, prefer Trump over Biden. In fact, 22 of 33 respondents in these four most recent locations feel this way.

And over the first year of the project, from March 2019 through February 2020, more than two-thirds of the "Obama-Trump" voters said they would take Trump over Obama in a hypothetical match-up.

Beyond the numbers, though, it's critical to understand why so many of them continue to support Trump.

They think a businessman is best suited to turn the country around economically. They feel Covid-19 was not Trump's fault, and he's doing the best he can to contain it. They conflate the Black Lives Matter protesters with the rioters attacking federal buildings and retail shops. They don't want historic monuments torn down. And they dismiss defunding the police as ridiculous.

These voters tell me they want America finally to be put first; they oppose immigration and trade policies they say give benefits to foreigners at their expense. And they want a non-politician who relentlessly fights back, after witnessing too many office holders fold in the face of special interests.

These voters may sound like typical Fox News watchers, but, significantly, the overwhelming majority are not. Many are, instead, people who get their news disproportionately from local television, regional websites and Facebook. Compared to the kinds of people who seek out news from national cable channels, many swing voters reside in a national politics desert.

In short, while America's political media generate a pipeline's worth of information daily, these swing voters consume merely a trickle.

Consider this: Over the past several months, most of my "Obama-Trump" voters couldn't name a single thing Biden had said or done regarding the pandemic. In bellwether Macomb County, on July 21, none of the nine voters I interviewed could name a single thing Biden had achieved in nearly 50 years in national politics.

Worse for the former vice president, several told me Biden would be a "puppet" of others if he were elected. That's because many are convinced he has "dementia," and they mocked him after seeing videos of his misstatements online.

That said, these voters are under no illusions about Trump's shortcomings. They hate the tweeting, but some tolerate it as the price for hiring the relentless fighter they want. As one woman in Edina, Minnesota, told me, Trump makes her feel "confident, but sometimes a little cringe-worthy."

In January 2016, I made a bet with a client that Trump would be the GOP nominee, when no one had yet voted. My client thought I was crazy, and even remarked, "Just to be clear, you get Trump, and I get the 16 other candidates?" After Trump won the nomination, my client thought I was a genius. I'm far from it, but I'm a pretty good listener.

What I heard was a certain candidate for president sounding exactly like the center-right focus group respondents I'd been interviewing for nearly 15 years. They and Trump shared the same grievances about America's decline and expressed them in a similarly simple and straight forward way. No other politician came close in terms of expressing what these people truly felt.

This year, Trump will not be able to vilify Biden. These swing voters do not dislike Biden the way they still dislike Hillary Clinton. And, so, Trump is taking a different approach, casting doubt on Biden by focusing on questions of his mental acuity and verbal mistakes. And he will likely get far by alleging Biden's lifetime in politics has not having yielded a single, career-defining achievement.


So there it is. Life outside your bubble.
User avatar
thebuzzardman
RealGM
Posts: 82,258
And1: 96,221
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: Villanovknicks

Re: Democratic Primary Thread: The Deuce 

Post#1096 » by thebuzzardman » Thu Aug 13, 2020 10:15 am

BallSacBounce wrote:
HarthorneWingo wrote:
BallSacBounce wrote:I was told the same thing in 2016 when I said Trump was going to win, coworkers laughed and mocked and ridiculed me. So I said, let's bet on it. They did, later I laughed at them.

I'll never forget the stunned silence of bubble living people trying to make sense of reality. Sublime, an unbelievably delicious treat.



True but now we actually experienced the “real of the deal.” And it was pretty, pretty, pretty ugly. His complete bungling of his response to the virus, if nothing else, will sink his presidency. Also, he hasn’t accomplished very much of anything to help the middle class. His border wall is a waste of time and money and was done, like most things he pursues, just to soothe his fragile ego. Also the tax cut only served to line the pockets of the uber rich and corporations. Long Island middle class home owners got killed with his cut in the home mortgage interest deduction.

If you see an electoral path for Trump to re-election, then I’d love to it. But base it on solid poll numbers. Don’t come at me with. I Ben Shapiro BS. :lol:

This far out I don't even look at the polls. And when I do start looking at them I'll be paying attention for weighting and bias. That's what I did the last time and that was the fatal mistake for the doubters. They believed their own propaganda.

It should be no surprise at this point but sometimes others see things differently than you. Others see a vibrant economy, prosperous times which helped everyone before the virus and don't hold Trump accountable for the aftermath.

Others appreciate the wall and the sticking up for the American Worker he repeatedly does with the trade deals. Others prefer the law and order he stands for and have no stomach for the disorder and chaos allowed to run roughshod over their lives, believe it or not.

He'll lose New Yorkers? How exactly will that affect his electoral chances?

He will get re-elected. It's not just me saying these things.

Here's what swing voters are saying about Trump:
https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/29/opinions/swing-voters-midwest-trump-support-thau/index.html
And, each month for the past 17 months, I've had a unique window into the Americans largely responsible for giving the president his slim Electoral College victory: so-called "Obama-Trump" swing voters across the upper Midwest.

Our Swing Voter Project has uncovered that many of these people, who live in places such as Canton, Ohio; Davenport, Iowa; Erie, Pennsylvania; and Macomb County, Michigan, prefer Trump over Biden. In fact, 22 of 33 respondents in these four most recent locations feel this way.

And over the first year of the project, from March 2019 through February 2020, more than two-thirds of the "Obama-Trump" voters said they would take Trump over Obama in a hypothetical match-up.

Beyond the numbers, though, it's critical to understand why so many of them continue to support Trump.

They think a businessman is best suited to turn the country around economically. They feel Covid-19 was not Trump's fault, and he's doing the best he can to contain it. They conflate the Black Lives Matter protesters with the rioters attacking federal buildings and retail shops. They don't want historic monuments torn down. And they dismiss defunding the police as ridiculous.

These voters tell me they want America finally to be put first; they oppose immigration and trade policies they say give benefits to foreigners at their expense. And they want a non-politician who relentlessly fights back, after witnessing too many office holders fold in the face of special interests.

These voters may sound like typical Fox News watchers, but, significantly, the overwhelming majority are not. Many are, instead, people who get their news disproportionately from local television, regional websites and Facebook. Compared to the kinds of people who seek out news from national cable channels, many swing voters reside in a national politics desert.

In short, while America's political media generate a pipeline's worth of information daily, these swing voters consume merely a trickle.

Consider this: Over the past several months, most of my "Obama-Trump" voters couldn't name a single thing Biden had said or done regarding the pandemic. In bellwether Macomb County, on July 21, none of the nine voters I interviewed could name a single thing Biden had achieved in nearly 50 years in national politics.

Worse for the former vice president, several told me Biden would be a "puppet" of others if he were elected. That's because many are convinced he has "dementia," and they mocked him after seeing videos of his misstatements online.

That said, these voters are under no illusions about Trump's shortcomings. They hate the tweeting, but some tolerate it as the price for hiring the relentless fighter they want. As one woman in Edina, Minnesota, told me, Trump makes her feel "confident, but sometimes a little cringe-worthy."

In January 2016, I made a bet with a client that Trump would be the GOP nominee, when no one had yet voted. My client thought I was crazy, and even remarked, "Just to be clear, you get Trump, and I get the 16 other candidates?" After Trump won the nomination, my client thought I was a genius. I'm far from it, but I'm a pretty good listener.

What I heard was a certain candidate for president sounding exactly like the center-right focus group respondents I'd been interviewing for nearly 15 years. They and Trump shared the same grievances about America's decline and expressed them in a similarly simple and straight forward way. No other politician came close in terms of expressing what these people truly felt.

This year, Trump will not be able to vilify Biden. These swing voters do not dislike Biden the way they still dislike Hillary Clinton. And, so, Trump is taking a different approach, casting doubt on Biden by focusing on questions of his mental acuity and verbal mistakes. And he will likely get far by alleging Biden's lifetime in politics has not having yielded a single, career-defining achievement.


So there it is. Life outside your bubble.


People who get their "news" from Facebook.

No wonder the country is in trouble.
Image
BallSacBounce
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,929
And1: 2,411
Joined: Dec 14, 2011

Re: Democratic Primary Thread: The Deuce 

Post#1097 » by BallSacBounce » Thu Aug 13, 2020 10:36 am

thebuzzardman wrote:
BallSacBounce wrote:
HarthorneWingo wrote:

True but now we actually experienced the “real of the deal.” And it was pretty, pretty, pretty ugly. His complete bungling of his response to the virus, if nothing else, will sink his presidency. Also, he hasn’t accomplished very much of anything to help the middle class. His border wall is a waste of time and money and was done, like most things he pursues, just to soothe his fragile ego. Also the tax cut only served to line the pockets of the uber rich and corporations. Long Island middle class home owners got killed with his cut in the home mortgage interest deduction.

If you see an electoral path for Trump to re-election, then I’d love to it. But base it on solid poll numbers. Don’t come at me with. I Ben Shapiro BS. :lol:

This far out I don't even look at the polls. And when I do start looking at them I'll be paying attention for weighting and bias. That's what I did the last time and that was the fatal mistake for the doubters. They believed their own propaganda.

It should be no surprise at this point but sometimes others see things differently than you. Others see a vibrant economy, prosperous times which helped everyone before the virus and don't hold Trump accountable for the aftermath.

Others appreciate the wall and the sticking up for the American Worker he repeatedly does with the trade deals. Others prefer the law and order he stands for and have no stomach for the disorder and chaos allowed to run roughshod over their lives, believe it or not.

He'll lose New Yorkers? How exactly will that affect his electoral chances?

He will get re-elected. It's not just me saying these things.

Here's what swing voters are saying about Trump:
https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/29/opinions/swing-voters-midwest-trump-support-thau/index.html
And, each month for the past 17 months, I've had a unique window into the Americans largely responsible for giving the president his slim Electoral College victory: so-called "Obama-Trump" swing voters across the upper Midwest.

Our Swing Voter Project has uncovered that many of these people, who live in places such as Canton, Ohio; Davenport, Iowa; Erie, Pennsylvania; and Macomb County, Michigan, prefer Trump over Biden. In fact, 22 of 33 respondents in these four most recent locations feel this way.

And over the first year of the project, from March 2019 through February 2020, more than two-thirds of the "Obama-Trump" voters said they would take Trump over Obama in a hypothetical match-up.

Beyond the numbers, though, it's critical to understand why so many of them continue to support Trump.

They think a businessman is best suited to turn the country around economically. They feel Covid-19 was not Trump's fault, and he's doing the best he can to contain it. They conflate the Black Lives Matter protesters with the rioters attacking federal buildings and retail shops. They don't want historic monuments torn down. And they dismiss defunding the police as ridiculous.

These voters tell me they want America finally to be put first; they oppose immigration and trade policies they say give benefits to foreigners at their expense. And they want a non-politician who relentlessly fights back, after witnessing too many office holders fold in the face of special interests.

These voters may sound like typical Fox News watchers, but, significantly, the overwhelming majority are not. Many are, instead, people who get their news disproportionately from local television, regional websites and Facebook. Compared to the kinds of people who seek out news from national cable channels, many swing voters reside in a national politics desert.

In short, while America's political media generate a pipeline's worth of information daily, these swing voters consume merely a trickle.

Consider this: Over the past several months, most of my "Obama-Trump" voters couldn't name a single thing Biden had said or done regarding the pandemic. In bellwether Macomb County, on July 21, none of the nine voters I interviewed could name a single thing Biden had achieved in nearly 50 years in national politics.

Worse for the former vice president, several told me Biden would be a "puppet" of others if he were elected. That's because many are convinced he has "dementia," and they mocked him after seeing videos of his misstatements online.

That said, these voters are under no illusions about Trump's shortcomings. They hate the tweeting, but some tolerate it as the price for hiring the relentless fighter they want. As one woman in Edina, Minnesota, told me, Trump makes her feel "confident, but sometimes a little cringe-worthy."

In January 2016, I made a bet with a client that Trump would be the GOP nominee, when no one had yet voted. My client thought I was crazy, and even remarked, "Just to be clear, you get Trump, and I get the 16 other candidates?" After Trump won the nomination, my client thought I was a genius. I'm far from it, but I'm a pretty good listener.

What I heard was a certain candidate for president sounding exactly like the center-right focus group respondents I'd been interviewing for nearly 15 years. They and Trump shared the same grievances about America's decline and expressed them in a similarly simple and straight forward way. No other politician came close in terms of expressing what these people truly felt.

This year, Trump will not be able to vilify Biden. These swing voters do not dislike Biden the way they still dislike Hillary Clinton. And, so, Trump is taking a different approach, casting doubt on Biden by focusing on questions of his mental acuity and verbal mistakes. And he will likely get far by alleging Biden's lifetime in politics has not having yielded a single, career-defining achievement.


So there it is. Life outside your bubble.


People who get their "news" from Facebook.

No wonder the country is in trouble.


Most people are too busy running their lives and enjoying the little spare time they get. I understand. It's us political addicts that are a bit off, but necessary to nudge things.
Archerbro
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,126
And1: 1,355
Joined: Jun 27, 2010

Re: Democratic Primary Thread: The Deuce 

Post#1098 » by Archerbro » Thu Aug 13, 2020 1:11 pm

Didn't Kamala put many people away for Marijuana related arrests?

don't get me wrong, i like her but Democratic party to me continues to make me sick and let down many progressives. the fact that loser amy and pete dropped out was proof of that. Hell I still think Buttigieg was the better moderate. Just glad as hell that Kamala was taken over abrams and warren.
User avatar
GONYK
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 67,010
And1: 45,779
Joined: Jun 27, 2003
Location: Brunson Gang
   

Re: Democratic Primary Thread: The Deuce 

Post#1099 » by GONYK » Thu Aug 13, 2020 1:12 pm

BallSacBounce wrote:
thebuzzardman wrote:
BallSacBounce wrote:This far out I don't even look at the polls. And when I do start looking at them I'll be paying attention for weighting and bias. That's what I did the last time and that was the fatal mistake for the doubters. They believed their own propaganda.

It should be no surprise at this point but sometimes others see things differently than you. Others see a vibrant economy, prosperous times which helped everyone before the virus and don't hold Trump accountable for the aftermath.

Others appreciate the wall and the sticking up for the American Worker he repeatedly does with the trade deals. Others prefer the law and order he stands for and have no stomach for the disorder and chaos allowed to run roughshod over their lives, believe it or not.

He'll lose New Yorkers? How exactly will that affect his electoral chances?

He will get re-elected. It's not just me saying these things.

Here's what swing voters are saying about Trump:
https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/29/opinions/swing-voters-midwest-trump-support-thau/index.html


So there it is. Life outside your bubble.


People who get their "news" from Facebook.

No wonder the country is in trouble.


Most people are too busy running their lives and enjoying the little spare time they get. I understand. It's us political addicts that are a bit off, but necessary to nudge things.


I think the notion of "the secret Trump voter" has been heavily disproven.

These swing state voters who like Trump exist, for sure, but I'm not sure why the belief is that they are unaccounted for.
Pointgod
RealGM
Posts: 24,204
And1: 24,503
Joined: Jun 28, 2014

Re: Democratic Primary Thread: The Deuce 

Post#1100 » by Pointgod » Thu Aug 13, 2020 1:18 pm

BallSacBounce wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
EricAnderson wrote:Trumps one card he’ll play is how your suburbs aren’t safe and antifa an blacks will burn your house down if the democrats win but it’s impossible to play that card with Kamala

And how Biden and Kamala are some far left socialists couldn’t be further from the truth but clearly as you’ve seen in this thread and in general there’s people dumb enough to believe it


Images like the black guy smiling as he walked past a group of gun toting whites lined up on the side of the road in an act of intimidation will stick in the minds of suburban moms as much as any image of a burning building during the riots.

I think more people are fed up with gun proliferation and now people brandishing their weapons to intimidate than they are with a bunch of protestors marching through their suburban neighborhood chanting BLM.

School shootings and actual acts of domestic terrorism that are often racially driven are a bigger threat to most families than a congregation of people expressing their first amendment rights even if sometimes there are people who go too far. And most of those people have probably caught on that Antifa is a right wing propaganda slogan, not an actual insurrectionary force about to overthrow the government.

I trust enough Americans now understand that the real threat is going to come from fascists who will ruin this country if they consolidate power and turn the security state into a full-time shakedown operation of anyone who opposes them staying in power. Then it will be everyone in their rifle sights regardless of race or religion. It will be just Us vs. Them, Civilians vs. Rulers.

That's the greater threat and Trump has made it very clear that's what he stands for. He is the very definition of anti-Democracy so anyone who values their freedom and the right to vote in the future will be against Trump now. Trump mocks everything soldiers pledged their lives to defend so I expect a heavy showing of angry veterans at the polls this time.

Your first paragraph nah, not a chance.

Second paragraph I think your suburban mom is way more interested in personal protection for their family than you think.

Third one, really? You think Antifa is nothing more than a right wing slogan? Who's burning down the buildings and destroying things then? There's like, photo evidence, indictments and stuff.

The fourth paragraph is pure projection. It was Trump that was attacked by security state fascists trying to consolidate their power in place of a duly elected president. I mean really now. You can agree with them if you want but how can you not see they did exactly what you accuse others of. That's hilarious.

Fifth paragraph, whatever.


Okay let’s see those indictments of Antifa members from a DOJ source. I bet you can’t produce them because like everything Trump and his administration say it’s complete bull. Why isn’t Trump and Barr talking about the white supremacists and far right presence that are causing violence in the protests and killing police? You can’t claim to be law and order but completely ignore domestic terrorists because they’re just as racist as you. Here’s a link, I know you won’t read it so I pulled out the important parts for you.

https://theintercept.com/2020/07/15/george-floyd-protests-police-far-right-antifa/

Among the steady stream of threats from the far-right were repeated encounters between law enforcement and heavily armed adherents of the so-called boogaloo movement, which welcomes armed confrontation with cops as means to trigger civil war. With much of the U.S. policing apparatus on the hunt for antifa instigators, those violent aspirations appear to have materialized in a string of targeted attacks in California that left a federal protective services officer and a sheriff’s deputy dead and several other law enforcement officials wounded.


German argued that the impulse to paint both sides of the political spectrum with the same brush, despite the fact that only the far right is actively killing people, is among the most dangerous features of modern American law enforcement. In his review of the documents produced in response to the recent protests, German said purported “threats” from antifa were routinely overblown, often framed vandalism as terrorism and were typically absent of concrete evidence of serious criminal activity.


In a separate document disseminated the following day, DHS warned its workforce that the nation’s “period of darkness” would soon worsen, as “violent protest movements” grew. Domestic extremists would capitalize on the unrest to “take over government facilities and attack law enforcement,” DHS predicted, with protests following police killings of civilians “posing a high risk of escalating to both premeditated and random attacks targeting law enforcement officers nationwide.” The document went on to describe how “users of a white supremacist extremist Telegram channel attempted to incite followers to engage in violence and start the ‘boogaloo’ — a term used by some violent extremists to refer to the start of a second Civil War — by shooting in a crowd.”

Among the developments cited in the bulletin was the May 29 assassination of a federal court security guard in Oakland. The alleged perpetrator would later be identified as Steven Carrillo, a 32-year-old sergeant in an elite Air Force security unit. According to authorities, Carrillo would go on to ambush and kill a sheriff’s deputy and wound several others in a second targeted attack days later. In court filings last month, the FBI reported that the airman had a ballistics vest bearing a boogaloo patch. Following a shootout with police, Carrillo reportedly used his own blood to scrawl phrases associated with the movement on the hood of a vehicle he had carjacked.


https://www.reuters.com/article/us-global-race-protests-antifa/us-prosecutors-do-not-charge-portland-protesters-with-antifa-ties-idUSKCN2502NQ

U.S. federal prosecutors have produced no evidence linking dozens of people arrested in anti-racism protests in Portland, Oregon, to the antifa or anarchist movements, despite President Donald Trump's assertions they are fueling the unrest.

A spokesman for the U.S. Attorney's office in Portland confirmed this in an email to Reuters on Tuesday.


Just because Trump repeats the same lies over and over again doesn’t make it true. Only really stupid people believe anything from him and his administration. You’re being conned by a conman and you’re only happy to be conned. What happened to the migrant hoards at the border right before the 2018 midterms or the threats from MS13? Don’t you find it the tiniest bit convenient that all these threats disappeared once the midterms were over? I suspect that you’re a troll so I’ve just wasted my time but stop spreading this stupid bull because it makes you look like a delusional idiot.

Return to New York Knicks