Pointgod wrote:Stannis wrote:Krystal Ball with some fire tweets lately:
This one is just too funny:
?s=20
?s=20
?s=20
Ooooh Krystal really channeling that edgy teen energy. Too bad she’s a grown woman with the intellect of a turnip.
FFY
Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23
Pointgod wrote:Stannis wrote:Krystal Ball with some fire tweets lately:
This one is just too funny:
?s=20
?s=20
?s=20
Ooooh Krystal really channeling that edgy teen energy. Too bad she’s a grown woman with the intellect of a turnip.
Clyde_Style wrote:Pointgod wrote:Stannis wrote:Krystal Ball with some fire tweets lately:
This one is just too funny:
?s=20
?s=20
?s=20
Ooooh Krystal really channeling that edgy teen energy. Too bad she’s a grown woman with the intellect of a turnip.
FFY
Stannis wrote:Krystal Ball with some fire tweets lately:
This one is just too funny:
?s=20
?s=20
?s=20
Jimmit79 wrote:At this point I want RJ to get paid
Oscirus wrote:While Krystal does have a point in regards to their treatment of progressives at this convention, she became white noise the moment she talked about going third party as soon as it became evident biden was going to win.
HarthorneWingo wrote:Oscirus wrote:While Krystal does have a point in regards to their treatment of progressives at this convention, she became white noise the moment she talked about going third party as soon as it became evident biden was going to win.
Is that still her position? In any event, her opinions on those two respective issues are independent of each other. She’s right about what’s going eat the Convention. Does she still believe in voting third party now and, if so, is it limited non-swing states?
Jimmit79 wrote:At this point I want RJ to get paid
Oscirus wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:Oscirus wrote:While Krystal does have a point in regards to their treatment of progressives at this convention, she became white noise the moment she talked about going third party as soon as it became evident biden was going to win.
Is that still her position? In any event, her opinions on those two respective issues are independent of each other. She’s right about what’s going eat the Convention. Does she still believe in voting third party now and, if so, is it limited non-swing states?
Not really, if a candidates not gonna please her no matter what he does and she chooses to stay on the sideline, then her opinions irrelevant since she's clearly looking for things to support her decision.
EricAnderson wrote:The progressive Bernie Bro’s are annoying as hell.. Trying to say there not gonna vote for anyone out of spite.
I’m sorry but going far left is not the answer. You’re not gonna win pandering to the extreme fringes of your party.
Besides the far left/progressives will always eat their own eventually anyway.
There looking for some perfect human being who doesn’t exist.
Anyone who’s ever made a mistake they want their heads.
You could have the progressive candidate they all want but then they’d find some quote the person made from 1982 that they feel is anti trans or something and they’d throw that candidate under the bus.
EricAnderson wrote:There looking for some perfect human being who doesn’t exist.
Anyone who’s ever made a mistake they want their heads.
You could have the progressive candidate they all want but then they’d find some quote the person made from 1982 that they feel is anti trans or something and they’d throw that candidate under the bus.
j4remi wrote:Oscirus wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:
Is that still her position? In any event, her opinions on those two respective issues are independent of each other. She’s right about what’s going eat the Convention. Does she still believe in voting third party now and, if so, is it limited non-swing states?
Not really, if a candidates not gonna please her no matter what he does and she chooses to stay on the sideline, then her opinions irrelevant since she's clearly looking for things to support her decision.
Krystal Ball and Glenn Greenwald are two people whose work I really liked in the past but whom I think personal bad experiences with the Democratic establishment have pushed them to be more cynical than I can agree with at times. The voting third party is one place where I don't agree with 'em...though I admit in safe blue or red states, it typically doesn't matter to me.
j4remi wrote:Oscirus wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:
Is that still her position? In any event, her opinions on those two respective issues are independent of each other. She’s right about what’s going eat the Convention. Does she still believe in voting third party now and, if so, is it limited non-swing states?
Not really, if a candidates not gonna please her no matter what he does and she chooses to stay on the sideline, then her opinions irrelevant since she's clearly looking for things to support her decision.
Krystal Ball and Glenn Greenwald are two people whose work I really liked in the past but whom I think personal bad experiences with the Democratic establishment have pushed them to be more cynical than I can agree with at times. The voting third party is one place where I don't agree with 'em...though I admit in safe blue or red states, it typically doesn't matter to me.
Jimmit79 wrote:At this point I want RJ to get paid
Jimmit79 wrote:At this point I want RJ to get paid
Jimmit79 wrote:At this point I want RJ to get paid
Oscirus wrote:Even though he's old as ****, Bill is still really good at this