Stannis wrote:br7knicks wrote:ibraheim718 wrote:
I love her in more ways than 1. The DNC is already trying to blacklist her. To not have her speak at the convention is a travesty. I'll never support either party.. eff that.
To completely keep her out and away from the party should be embarrassing for them. She's reasonable and smart enough, for people like me, to have swung people that hate Trump, but don't like biden, to some good change that we need.
I initially wanted Andrew Yang. The masses and media were against him for some reason. Like, they tried to say he was appealing to White supremacist lol. And lot of outlets like Vice kept questioning him on that... like seriously, an Asian guy gonna be the man for White supremacist?
But he fell off on his own and he no realistic shot. Not sure how dedicated he was to the progressive cause as he didn't endorse Sanders or Warren after he dropped out. He waited till the primary was decided to endorse Biden, which I thought was a little weak for a progressive.
Then it was Bernie Sanders. I was really upset that he didn't work with Tulsi, and apparently wouldn't accept her endorsement. She was my third choice.
They probably don't like her now because she absolutely torched Harris
Well, unfortunately it comes to the media and who they want to push. Them and millennials are the problems (I am one). If someone says something they disagree with, they're labeled a Nazi, xenophobe, bigot, etc (I forget the whole list). It's sad because, not only is it not true, but it dilutes the meaning of those words. Andrew Yang and members of the KKK should not be roped into the same group. The problem is, because of media agendas, they push a narrative, and once someone is given one of those horrible, but now meaningless (because of how frequently they're thrown around), terms, people like Yang don't stand a chance.
See, I was the opposite. I initially didn't like Yang. But when I listened to him compared to other candidates besides Tulsi, I liked him a lot more. Like his big push was UBI, which I am very much against. I have heard people trying to argue it. The only good case I've heard, and it was by a Canadian named Jordan Peterson, is that it would allow people to pursue entrepreneurial ideas that can help push good ideas and inventions. The problem. With that, I see, is that those people are not as prevalent compared to people who would just see it as free money, so they can work less. I wish I was wrong, but most Americans (not all) are inherently lazy and greedy.
But the more I listened to him, I'd like his business-like approach to fixing this country. That's why I'd vote for mark Cuban if he decided to run.
He was a great listen on rogan's podcast. If things started over, I feel like I'd vote for Yang. Like Tulsi, I feel he's not extreme enough, and would gain a lot of votes from people like me who hate Trump, but wouldn't like a Bernie or Biden presidency.
Again, if Biden had signed up Tulsi, or Yang, for his VP, I'd definitely consider voting for him
