ImageImage

Giannis Thread - 2 Time MVP - The Contract discussions

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis

Fotis St
General Manager
Posts: 9,447
And1: 3,143
Joined: May 05, 2015

Re: Giannis Thread - Met with ownership pg 6 

Post#201 » by Fotis St » Mon Sep 14, 2020 4:50 pm

I think Giannis was against the sign n trade of Brogdon and he just went to Lasry and said "I told you so, now what ? You gonna go cheap or will you gonna go ALL IN for a ring ? Cause I'm going ALL IN for 7 years in row... Are we on the same page ? If we are ... show me "
User avatar
SirChurros
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,598
And1: 4,283
Joined: Apr 02, 2015
   

Re: Giannis Thread - Met with ownership pg 6 

Post#202 » by SirChurros » Mon Sep 14, 2020 4:53 pm

BradMKE wrote:"Lasry confirming willingness to spend into luxury tax"

Yeah, we heard that one before...

Can't see them spending big $ with the big drop in revenue this and especially next season, plus the future cap ramifications if they decide to spread that revenue loss over multiple seasons' caps. You're going to have contract costs going up significantly each year with no cap increases making it tough to fill out the rest of the roster.

Yeah, the owners want to win but they also want to make as much (or lose as little) $ as possible.


I don't know. From a monetary perspective, it makes more sense for them to dip into the luxury tax and build a team that can win a title. Winning a title and keeping Giannis in Milwaukee is a far better scenario for their bottom line than being cheap, not winning and having Giannis leave. That would sink the value of the franchise.
User avatar
SirChurros
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,598
And1: 4,283
Joined: Apr 02, 2015
   

Re: Giannis Thread - Met with ownership pg 6 

Post#203 » by SirChurros » Mon Sep 14, 2020 4:55 pm

Fotis St wrote:I think Giannis was against the sign n trade of Brogdon and he just went to Lasry and said "I told you so, now what ? You gonna go cheap or will you gonna go ALL IN for a ring ? Cause I'm going ALL IN for 7 years in row... Are we on the same page ? If we are ... show me "


The problem is we don't have the assets to go all in on anything. This puts a lot of pressure on Horst to work a miracle, and I really can't see it happening this offseason.
User avatar
Nowak008
RealGM
Posts: 14,588
And1: 4,303
Joined: Jul 07, 2006
Location: Book Publisher
Contact:

Re: Giannis Thread - Met with ownership pg 6 

Post#204 » by Nowak008 » Mon Sep 14, 2020 5:02 pm

Giannis meeting with Lasry to discuss the roster you say?

Image
Image
John Hammond apologists:
emunney wrote:
Ron Swanson wrote: 9 YEARS!? like any of that matters


THAT LITERALLY IS HIS TENURE.
coolhandluke121
RealGM
Posts: 14,308
And1: 7,453
Joined: Sep 23, 2007

Re: Giannis Thread - Met with ownership pg 6 

Post#205 » by coolhandluke121 » Mon Sep 14, 2020 5:09 pm

I'm obviously all for the luxury tax, but sometimes refusing to pay it can help you avoid big mistakes. Gotta choose the right players if you're going to be frugal though. Personally I wasn't a fan of all the crazy gymnastics they went through to keep Brook because he didn't have Bird Rights. Could have kept Brogdon instead of signing Brook and RoLo. Then you could have had the full MLE instead of the room MLE.

I'll believe it when I see it re: the luxury tax. I suppose I can be a little less skeptical of Ersan trade ideas, but that's as far as I'll go until the ink is actually on the paper.
Wut we've got here is... faaailure... to communakate.
Chuck Diesel
RealGM
Posts: 17,587
And1: 11,556
Joined: May 23, 2004

Re: Giannis Thread - Met with ownership pg 6 

Post#206 » by Chuck Diesel » Mon Sep 14, 2020 5:10 pm

This is now like the third straight year that a Lasry has confirmed they’ll spend the luxury tax.
Fotis St
General Manager
Posts: 9,447
And1: 3,143
Joined: May 05, 2015

Re: Giannis Thread - Met with ownership pg 6 

Post#207 » by Fotis St » Mon Sep 14, 2020 5:16 pm

Chuck Diesel wrote:This is now like the third straight year that a Lasry has confirmed they’ll spend the luxury tax.


Yeah, its more about Giannis expressing his complains about the the Brogdon move than anything else. Its not even about being at the same page , its about being on the same planet.

The most irritating thing is not being able to get the 23M trade exception from the Brogdon trade.

We lost the player , we lost a 20+M trade exception and all we basically got is #24 in probably the weakest draft class of the decade or more
soxperry
Head Coach
Posts: 6,072
And1: 4,784
Joined: Jul 08, 2018
     

Re: Giannis Thread - Met with ownership pg 6 

Post#208 » by soxperry » Mon Sep 14, 2020 5:19 pm

As much as i like a lot of Brogdon's game, he isn't the kind of guy that we need to put us over the top. He's just more of the same. The guy can't really shoot on the run. The only shot he can create for himself is a floater or a layup. Otherwise, he's just a catch and shoot specialist. Would his leadership ability, his calm demeanor, and his 3 point shooting have helped against Miami? Yes. But we need a true creator and i'm glad we didn't shoot our wad on Brogdon.
User avatar
LedZepp007
General Manager
Posts: 8,300
And1: 3,572
Joined: Aug 10, 2012
Location: Boston
     

Re: Giannis Thread - Met with ownership pg 6 

Post#209 » by LedZepp007 » Mon Sep 14, 2020 5:25 pm

MissKhriddleton wrote:
LedZepp007 wrote:Gulp... what about Middleton, Bledsoe, Hill, and Indy’s first for Wall and Beal?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

In a second.

Dame
Beal
Kemba
Booker

Will give up literally anything besides Giannis to get any of these guys. No price is too high. Don't think we have the assets to pull it off though.

It works in the trade machine. Steep price to pay for Beal and taking on Wall’s awful contract, I think Washington seriously considers that offer. You hope Wall comes back with something left in the tank.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The Bulls are the absolute worst.
GBPackers47
Starter
Posts: 2,166
And1: 1,294
Joined: Jun 23, 2016
     

Re: Giannis Thread - Met with ownership pg 6 

Post#210 » by GBPackers47 » Mon Sep 14, 2020 5:29 pm

BradMKE wrote:"Lasry confirming willingness to spend into luxury tax"

Yeah, we heard that one before...

Can't see them spending big $ with the big drop in revenue this and especially next season, plus the future cap ramifications if they decide to spread that revenue loss over multiple seasons' caps. You're going to have contract costs going up significantly each year with no cap increases making it tough to fill out the rest of the roster.

Yeah, the owners want to win but they also want to make as much (or lose as little) $ as possible.


Would be interesting to see how much they would pay by spending money now to win and keep Giannis vs what they’d lose if Giannis left and the Milwaukee Bucks plummeted in value overnight.
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 105,117
And1: 57,187
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: Giannis Thread - Met with ownership pg 6 

Post#211 » by MickeyDavis » Mon Sep 14, 2020 5:39 pm

Fotis St wrote:
Chuck Diesel wrote:This is now like the third straight year that a Lasry has confirmed they’ll spend the luxury tax.


Yeah, its more about Giannis expressing his complains about the the Brogdon move than anything else. Its not even about being at the same page , its about being on the same planet.

The most irritating thing is not being able to get the 23M trade exception from the Brogdon trade.

We lost the player , we lost a 20+M trade exception and all we basically got is #24 in probably the weakest draft class of the decade or more

It may be the 3rd straight year. But we are now just one year away from Giannis walking.
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
PG Graveyard
General Manager
Posts: 9,132
And1: 5,939
Joined: Nov 26, 2015
     

Re: Giannis Thread - Met with ownership pg 6 

Post#212 » by PG Graveyard » Mon Sep 14, 2020 5:44 pm

The easiest way to pay the tax would be to use Ersan's contract in a trade....Probably for CP. Then use the midlevel to sign someone and bring back Sterling Brown and maybe Pat C as well. I'm too **** at math to figure it all out, but I would guess once free agency opens up there is a sequence of moves by us similar to this that we do immediately.
User avatar
Ron Swanson
RealGM
Posts: 26,084
And1: 30,092
Joined: May 15, 2013

Re: Giannis Thread - Met with ownership pg 6 

Post#213 » by Ron Swanson » Mon Sep 14, 2020 6:01 pm

There's literally zero evidence that Giannis was "upset" about the Brogdon sign and trade.
tydett
General Manager
Posts: 8,667
And1: 8,084
Joined: Feb 15, 2012
   

Re: Giannis Thread - Met with ownership pg 6 

Post#214 » by tydett » Mon Sep 14, 2020 6:11 pm

And again, a Brogdon signing prevented Hill and Brook from being here (something that EVERYBODY, especially journalists) seem to have forgotten. They didn't have bird rights on Brook and once they decided to waive Hill to save money on his contract, lost his rights as well. If you keep Brogdon and Hill on his original contract, you are paying Brogdon $21 million and Hill $20 million and are deep in the luxury tax (and have no center).

Giannis said "run it back," Horst said "Ok, we can either lose one guy or two" and the math made sense.
User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 63,145
And1: 41,682
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

Re: Giannis Thread - Met with ownership pg 6 

Post#215 » by emunney » Mon Sep 14, 2020 6:22 pm

Fotis St wrote:
Chuck Diesel wrote:This is now like the third straight year that a Lasry has confirmed they’ll spend the luxury tax.


Yeah, its more about Giannis expressing his complains about the the Brogdon move than anything else. Its not even about being at the same page , its about being on the same planet.

The most irritating thing is not being able to get the 23M trade exception from the Brogdon trade.

We lost the player , we lost a 20+M trade exception and all we basically got is #24 in probably the weakest draft class of the decade or more


It would have been more like a 12m trade exception but yes I'll always be mad about this.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
tydett
General Manager
Posts: 8,667
And1: 8,084
Joined: Feb 15, 2012
   

Re: Giannis Thread - Met with ownership pg 6 

Post#216 » by tydett » Mon Sep 14, 2020 6:28 pm

emunney wrote:
Fotis St wrote:
Chuck Diesel wrote:This is now like the third straight year that a Lasry has confirmed they’ll spend the luxury tax.


Yeah, its more about Giannis expressing his complains about the the Brogdon move than anything else. Its not even about being at the same page , its about being on the same planet.

The most irritating thing is not being able to get the 23M trade exception from the Brogdon trade.

We lost the player , we lost a 20+M trade exception and all we basically got is #24 in probably the weakest draft class of the decade or more


It would have been more like a 12m trade exception but yes I'll always be mad about this.


Yes, not getting the TPE is the only truly upsetting thing about the deal, and is bush league John Hammond levels of CBA understanding.
User avatar
humanrefutation
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 33,218
And1: 16,910
Joined: Jun 05, 2006
       

Re: Giannis Thread - Met with ownership pg 6 

Post#217 » by humanrefutation » Mon Sep 14, 2020 6:37 pm

Giannis could also be worried that if he signs a supermax, they'll try to dump salary to avoid the tax.
UnFadeable21
Veteran
Posts: 2,712
And1: 845
Joined: Mar 30, 2019

Re: Giannis Thread - Met with ownership pg 6 

Post#218 » by UnFadeable21 » Mon Sep 14, 2020 7:48 pm

Fotis St wrote:I think Giannis was against the sign n trade of Brogdon and he just went to Lasry and said "I told you so, now what ? You gonna go cheap or will you gonna go ALL IN for a ring ? Cause I'm going ALL IN for 7 years in row... Are we on the same page ? If we are ... show me "


This is correct, Giannis wanted Brogdon bsck


The Bucks didn’t want to pay the luxury tax
ESPN reported that Bucks ownership would pay the luxury tax at the start of the Eastern Conference Finals. Ultimately, Milwaukee chose flexibility, assets, and immediate savings by deciding to trade Brogdon to the Pacers.

“Definitely wish he was still here,” Bucks star Giannis Antetokounmpo said. “One of my friends, one of the guys that I always teased every day when I see him — call him ugly, we’re just going back and forth. I’m going to miss that, but at the end of the day, you got to do what’s best for you. I wish him the best, I wish his team the best and I’m excited to play against him.”

Added Antetokounmpo about his Saturday matchup with Brogdon: “That’s my guy. It’s going to be weird. Played with Malcolm, I think, three years — my fourth, fifth, and sixth year — yeah, three years. Big part of our team’s success last year. It’s going to be weird seeing him in a different uniform.”



https://www.sbnation.com/platform/amp/nba/2019/11/19/20968208/malcolm-brogdon-free-agency-bucks-pacers-trade-draft-picks-giannis
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 105,117
And1: 57,187
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: Giannis Thread - Met with ownership pg 6 

Post#219 » by MickeyDavis » Mon Sep 14, 2020 7:55 pm

Giannis was also upset when Kidd was let go but somehow he got over it 8-)

Read on Twitter


Read on Twitter
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
User avatar
Ron Swanson
RealGM
Posts: 26,084
And1: 30,092
Joined: May 15, 2013

Re: Giannis Thread - Met with ownership pg 6 

Post#220 » by Ron Swanson » Mon Sep 14, 2020 7:56 pm

That's not what that means.

Guess Giannis must still be mad that we traded away his best friend MCW, right?

Return to Milwaukee Bucks