ImageImage

Giannis Thread - 2 Time MVP - The Contract discussions

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis

Bucksfan28
General Manager
Posts: 8,433
And1: 5,706
Joined: Nov 15, 2009

Re: Giannis Thread - Met with ownership pg 6 

Post#261 » by Bucksfan28 » Tue Sep 15, 2020 1:47 am

jakecronus8 wrote:
Bucksfan28 wrote:Tactically speaking, couldnt the Bucks let Giannis expire in 2021, sign a couple guys, then use his bird rights to go into the lux tax? If they dont guarantee Hill its looking like theyd be at $76M on the books.

Obviously a risky proposition and i havent given much thought to who those guys would be, but a quick glance at the FA list shows some talent.

No because of the cap hold.


Damn.
MoreTrife wrote:Love seeing two buffoons have a buffoon competition.
User avatar
Pachinko_
RealGM
Posts: 20,693
And1: 23,985
Joined: Jun 13, 2016
 

Re: Giannis Thread - Met with ownership pg 6 

Post#262 » by Pachinko_ » Tue Sep 15, 2020 2:26 am

Bucksfan28 wrote:Having someone like Brogdon would certainly help. For the role he would play on this team, I think you could find a guy for cheaper or a combo for the same money.

That's pretty much the summary.
No point paying for brogdon, only to tell him he's not allowed to do anything more than what Wes Matthews does.

Brogdon is good at things that we simply couldn't have him doing. If you think we'd give the ball to him in the play offs to walk it up court, put everyone in position and run some complex play, which is what he does in indy, you're dreaming.

In the Bucks unless your name is Giannis or Khris, if you get the ball you have max 2 seconds to finish whatever it is you're doing with it. Right or wrong, that was the plan last summer and Brogdon had no place in it. And if he did he wouldn't want it.


In case some of the trolls in this thread want an actual reason why we let Brogdon go.
El Duderino
RealGM
Posts: 20,545
And1: 1,328
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: Working on pad level

Re: Giannis Thread - Met with ownership pg 6 

Post#263 » by El Duderino » Tue Sep 15, 2020 2:38 am

I wonder if Giannis signs an extension, but not the five year max. Maybe something like Kawhi did with the Clippers, two plus one.

1. It guarantees Giannis a bunch more money on top of his expiring 100 million dollar deal, and with his young age, he'd still get another monster contract before he turns 30.

2. It allows him to show some loyalty to the Bucks which seems to matter to him, but doesn't tie him to the team for as long as a five year extension in case a title doesn't happen or look realistic.
James1980
Veteran
Posts: 2,865
And1: 503
Joined: Jul 02, 2003
Location: Milwaukee
     

Re: Giannis Thread - Met with ownership pg 6 

Post#264 » by James1980 » Tue Sep 15, 2020 2:52 am

Ok, but if you don't want Brogdon at 20 mil a year, at least you get the TPE.
NotYoAvgNBAFan wrote:I overlook foolishness.
User avatar
Plossum
General Manager
Posts: 9,222
And1: 6,175
Joined: Jan 18, 2014

Re: Giannis Thread - Met with ownership pg 6 

Post#265 » by Plossum » Tue Sep 15, 2020 3:00 am

I was on record saying that not signing Brogs was a mistake. But realistically, we still lose to Miami with him. Maybe we push it to six.

The fatal error was re-signing Bledsoe and failing to do anything about despite it being pretty clear he isn’t up to it.
#LockUpChuck
User avatar
Plossum
General Manager
Posts: 9,222
And1: 6,175
Joined: Jan 18, 2014

Re: Giannis Thread - Met with ownership pg 6 

Post#266 » by Plossum » Tue Sep 15, 2020 3:09 am

So it’s pretty obv Lasry leaking every details of the meeting with Giannis to Woj. This would kinda annoy me if I’m Giannis. Can you have a frank discussion with him if he’s straight on the line to Woj after your meetings all the time?
#LockUpChuck
User avatar
Brewhoopfan
Starter
Posts: 2,001
And1: 2,128
Joined: Nov 20, 2017
 

Re: Giannis Thread - Met with ownership pg 6 

Post#267 » by Brewhoopfan » Tue Sep 15, 2020 4:47 am

Bringing in a ball dominant PG like CP3 would change how the Bucks play considerably. The biggest change would be for Giannis. As great as Giannis has been, we've seen the playoff limitations of top of the key Giannis. Who is going to teach him to play off the ball?
skones
RealGM
Posts: 37,108
And1: 17,267
Joined: Jul 20, 2004

Re: Giannis Thread - Met with ownership pg 6 

Post#268 » by skones » Tue Sep 15, 2020 6:20 am

Brewhoopfan wrote:Bringing in a ball dominant PG like CP3 would change how the Bucks play considerably. The biggest change would be for Giannis. As great as Giannis has been, we've seen the playoff limitations of top of the key Giannis. Who is going to teach him to play off the ball?


Giannis needs to make a considerable skill leap this season in order for anything to work. We've now seen two (three if you want to count Boston in 18) give him CONSIDERABLE trouble, and then watched him force low IQ basketball. The irony of his quote on "seeing a wall and he's the guy who goes through it" was the entire problem in the Heat series. It's fair to question whether he can be the best player on an NBA Championship team where his game currently stands.

I'd be stunned if Bud wasn't able to tweak the playing style considerably to accommodate a guy like Paul. Both Teague and Schroder made considerable leaps under his tutelage. I think he understands what a guy like CP3 would bring to the table.
User avatar
Pachinko_
RealGM
Posts: 20,693
And1: 23,985
Joined: Jun 13, 2016
 

Re: Giannis Thread - Met with ownership pg 6 

Post#269 » by Pachinko_ » Tue Sep 15, 2020 11:06 am

skones wrote:
Brewhoopfan wrote:Bringing in a ball dominant PG like CP3 would change how the Bucks play considerably. The biggest change would be for Giannis. As great as Giannis has been, we've seen the playoff limitations of top of the key Giannis. Who is going to teach him to play off the ball?


Giannis needs to make a considerable skill leap this season in order for anything to work. We've now seen two (three if you want to count Boston in 18) give him CONSIDERABLE trouble, and then watched him force low IQ basketball. The irony of his quote on "seeing a wall and he's the guy who goes through it" was the entire problem in the Heat series. It's fair to question whether he can be the best player on an NBA Championship team where his game currently stands.

I'd be stunned if Bud wasn't able to tweak the playing style considerably to accommodate a guy like Paul. Both Teague and Schroder made considerable leaps under his tutelage. I think he understands what a guy like CP3 would bring to the table.

There's nothing to question, he simply can't do it. We've been talking about what he needs to add to his game for years and he's just not adding it. He adds muscle instead which is something I guess. Maybe we (better yet, the Bucks) need to get over it and think what else can be done instead of flogging the dead horse of Giannis becoming a half court play off scorer. It doesn't look like it's happening.

To be honest it's a pretty big limitation, but considering what else he brings to the table, the D, rebounds, finishing at the rim, pulling 2-3 defenders on him, pushing the ball straight off rebounds etc, it's pretty sad that we can't figure out a team strategy and roster construction that puts it all together.... there must be some way. We tried the shooters and the spacing, it didn't work.
Maybe we need to do the same thing but better. bring better shooters.
Fotis St
General Manager
Posts: 9,447
And1: 3,143
Joined: May 05, 2015

Re: Giannis Thread - Met with ownership pg 6 

Post#270 » by Fotis St » Tue Sep 15, 2020 1:00 pm

I believe we are asking too much from Giannis, its like we are asking from him to beat a whole team by himself.
So I myself pointed out that he needs to improve his FT%, that should be his next step of improvement.
Meanwhile people have expressed complains on why Giannis can't win a 1v3 - wall situation ?
Is that serious ? I mean lets ask him to Defend-get the rebound-get fast break points or if they get back and
we are on half court offense, beat the 1v3 , beat em all too and win us the trophy.
And do that in 32 minutes ? I mean this is bs, what the **** are we paying the others for ?
It hasn't happened ever in any team sport and Giannis even a SemiGod can't do it by himself.
We need better coaching right now, we need this 2nd guy that draws alot of attention and creates wholes to opponent defenses.
A playmaker , a creator and scorer , so Giannis can have a break even in game and be more relaxed and clever on his off ball movement to impact the game. Khris ain't that type of player, he can get his own shot alright but he can't create for others cause he is slow and his handles aren't that good to penetrate and create space for others.
User avatar
paulpressey25
Senior Mod - Bucks
Senior Mod - Bucks
Posts: 62,825
And1: 30,089
Joined: Oct 27, 2002
     

Re: Giannis Thread - Met with ownership pg 6 

Post#271 » by paulpressey25 » Tue Sep 15, 2020 1:07 pm

Plossum wrote:The fatal error was re-signing Bledsoe and failing to do anything about despite it being pretty clear he isn’t up to it.


There weren't a lot of other alternatives. Its hard to find a first team all-defense PG who can blow up the opposing team's offense at the point of attack.

Go back over Bucks PG history. Bledsoe will go down as one of the best over the last 30 years despite his brain freezes.

I'm not mitigating how damaging the brain freezes are. Just noting he brings a lot to the table that isn't easily replicated with "Frank Mason".
In depth discussions here - shorter stuff on Twitter

https://twitter.com/paulpressey25
tydett
General Manager
Posts: 8,667
And1: 8,084
Joined: Feb 15, 2012
   

Re: Giannis Thread - Met with ownership pg 6 

Post#272 » by tydett » Tue Sep 15, 2020 1:16 pm

paulpressey25 wrote:
Plossum wrote:The fatal error was re-signing Bledsoe and failing to do anything about despite it being pretty clear he isn’t up to it.


There weren't a lot of other alternatives. Its hard to find a first team all-defense PG who can blow up the opposing team's offense at the point of attack.

Go back over Bucks PG history. Bledsoe will go down as one of the best over the last 30 years despite his brain freezes.

I'm not mitigating how damaging the brain freezes are. Just noting he brings a lot to the table that isn't easily replicated with "Frank Mason".


I think people here will be surprised by the hubris of execs around the league/value Bledsoe has. He's on a very team friendly contract. He's an elite defender. He is a hard worker. He just can't shoot. On the Bucks this is magnified because his greatest skill as a PG, driving to the rim with reckless abandon, overlaps with our franchise player. RUSSELL WESTBROOK GARNERED POSITIVE ASSETS and one could argue that, total impact considered, he is a worse player than Bled (on a FAR worse contract). When (not really if anymore) Bled is traded this offseason, I think we'll get a good return for him.
User avatar
paulpressey25
Senior Mod - Bucks
Senior Mod - Bucks
Posts: 62,825
And1: 30,089
Joined: Oct 27, 2002
     

Re: Giannis Thread - Met with ownership pg 6 

Post#273 » by paulpressey25 » Tue Sep 15, 2020 1:22 pm

tydett wrote: He just can't shoot. On the Bucks this is magnified because his greatest skill as a PG, driving to the rim with reckless abandon, overlaps with our franchise player.


Agreed. Other teams don't have a PG who can drive like he can.

He also actually can shoot. All of his shooting metrics, FG%, 3p%, TS% really aren't that bad for a player who is as good a defender as he is. We aren't talking about TJ Ford, Brandon Jennings or MCW. Those guys couldn't shoot.

His issue is composure, especially when good teams turn up the D in the playoffs.
In depth discussions here - shorter stuff on Twitter

https://twitter.com/paulpressey25
User avatar
truly
Starter
Posts: 2,206
And1: 2,089
Joined: Feb 05, 2016
   

Re: Giannis Thread - Met with ownership pg 6 

Post#274 » by truly » Tue Sep 15, 2020 1:37 pm

Has Bledsoe really been that good defensively in the playoffs?
Baddy Chuck wrote:
Oscar71 wrote:
Did you really just post a lineup with the starting 2 guard being JR Smith?

Our actual management posted a lineup with the starting 2 guard being Tony Snell.
tydett
General Manager
Posts: 8,667
And1: 8,084
Joined: Feb 15, 2012
   

Re: Giannis Thread - Met with ownership pg 6 

Post#275 » by tydett » Tue Sep 15, 2020 1:40 pm

paulpressey25 wrote:
tydett wrote: He just can't shoot. On the Bucks this is magnified because his greatest skill as a PG, driving to the rim with reckless abandon, overlaps with our franchise player.


Agreed. Other teams don't have a PG who can drive like he can.

He also actually can shoot. All of his shooting metrics, FG%, 3p%, TS% really aren't that bad for a player who is as good a defender as he is. We aren't talking about TJ Ford, Brandon Jennings or MCW. Those guys couldn't shoot.

His issue is composure, especially when good teams turn up the D in the playoffs.


Eh, I think Jennings showed being a better shooter than Bled, he just couldn't finish. Bled has trouble from distance and definitely gets in his own head, but on another team, the coach could hide that. Here, it gets amplified because his defender sags and he doesn't have a way to consistently punish it.
User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 63,147
And1: 41,685
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

Re: Giannis Thread - Met with ownership pg 6 

Post#276 » by emunney » Tue Sep 15, 2020 1:44 pm

El Duderino wrote:I wonder if Giannis signs an extension, but not the five year max. Maybe something like Kawhi did with the Clippers, two plus one.

1. It guarantees Giannis a bunch more money on top of his expiring 100 million dollar deal, and with his young age, he'd still get another monster contract before he turns 30.

2. It allows him to show some loyalty to the Bucks which seems to matter to him, but doesn't tie him to the team for as long as a five year extension in case a title doesn't happen or look realistic.


I think this is probably the second most likely option, *most* likely if something can be done to assure extension signers this Fall that they're not going to get screwed by revenues dipping just for 1-2 years and then firing up the next year. If not, I think it's a 1+1 in free agency after next season and and we're hearing about all the teams who "intend to pursue" for another year.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
fansinceforever
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,237
And1: 2,664
Joined: Oct 26, 2010
   

Re: Giannis Thread - Met with ownership pg 6 

Post#277 » by fansinceforever » Tue Sep 15, 2020 1:50 pm

Daver wrote:
Fotis St wrote:I think Giannis was against the sign n trade of Brogdon and he just went to Lasry and said "I told you so, now what ? You gonna go cheap or will you gonna go ALL IN for a ring ? Cause I'm going ALL IN for 7 years in row... Are we on the same page ? If we are ... show me "



Man with all this garbage about brogdan you would think hes the second coming of MJ the dude didnt want to be in milwaukee and its funny nothing was said about brogdan during the season when they were racing to 70 wins.It was more like malcolm who? but crap your pants in the POs out comes damn horst you suck should of kept brogdan


It was mentioned often. Brogdon is a talented player whos skill set we needed more of even when he was on the roster.

It was obvious last year at this time and its even more obvious now. I would be shocked if that decision was not discussed during the 3 hour meeting.
coolhandluke121
RealGM
Posts: 14,308
And1: 7,453
Joined: Sep 23, 2007

Re: Giannis Thread - Met with ownership pg 6 

Post#278 » by coolhandluke121 » Tue Sep 15, 2020 1:53 pm

paulpressey25 wrote:
Plossum wrote:The fatal error was re-signing Bledsoe and failing to do anything about despite it being pretty clear he isn’t up to it.


There weren't a lot of other alternatives. Its hard to find a first team all-defense PG who can blow up the opposing team's offense at the point of attack.

Go back over Bucks PG history. Bledsoe will go down as one of the best over the last 30 years despite his brain freezes.

I'm not mitigating how damaging the brain freezes are. Just noting he brings a lot to the table that isn't easily replicated with "Frank Mason".


It was never going to be ideal with Bledsoe because he can't shoot and he's not a floor general, which are two things the team needs. However, it's ridiculous how much people are making him the fall guy this year. He's not any more to blame than any number of people involved. If he was the main problem this year, why were the Bucks one FT away from going up 3-0 and possibly sweeping a Raptors team that was far superior to this year's Heat with Bledsoe playing just as poorly in the ECF last year? Clearly a bunch of people involved tanked this time around.
Wut we've got here is... faaailure... to communakate.
fansinceforever
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,237
And1: 2,664
Joined: Oct 26, 2010
   

Re: Giannis Thread - Met with ownership pg 6 

Post#279 » by fansinceforever » Tue Sep 15, 2020 2:02 pm

He was culpable in the next 4 losses...

There is blame to share but when youre PG is scared to shoot the ball and can't restore calm to your offense in the playoffs, thats an enormous issue.
User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 63,147
And1: 41,685
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

Re: Giannis Thread - Met with ownership pg 6 

Post#280 » by emunney » Tue Sep 15, 2020 2:03 pm

paulpressey25 wrote:
Plossum wrote:The fatal error was re-signing Bledsoe and failing to do anything about despite it being pretty clear he isn’t up to it.


There weren't a lot of other alternatives. Its hard to find a first team all-defense PG who can blow up the opposing team's offense at the point of attack.

Go back over Bucks PG history. Bledsoe will go down as one of the best over the last 30 years despite his brain freezes.

I'm not mitigating how damaging the brain freezes are. Just noting he brings a lot to the table that isn't easily replicated with "Frank Mason".


Last night was thinking about how good our problems are compared to past years. Now it's that all our players aren't perfect. Just a few short years ago we were starting Delly and Henson.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts

Return to Milwaukee Bucks