Indeed wrote:Meanwhile, dismissing other analysis shows you are not trying see from others. Good luck, don't really want to response to you anymore.
https://stats.nba.com/lineups/advanced/?Season=2019-20&SeasonType=Playoffs&OpponentTeamID=1610612738&TeamID=1610612761&CF=MIN*G*5&sort=NET_RATING&dir=1
You look at one lineup and just ignore the other evidence from the link you posted?? E.g. ...

There were some good defensive moments, and offensive moments, with a Siakam-Ibaka frontcourt. Same with Siakam-Gasol. But the numbers on the whole are clear. With small sample size, there are quirky jumps in the data. The point of this thread is that the offense as a whole was not good enough. The sample size of 7 games showed that. That was almost exclusively with either Gasol or Ibaka on the court. Both of them had negative net ratings OVERALL, and particularly bad offensive ratings, even if you can find small samples otherwise. When we changed it up by going small and adding shooters, the Raptors were better at the game of basketball (but of course the sample is small for this, so we don't know what would have happened had they done more throughout the series). Because Nurse rarely went to it. He should have, because sticking to the same thing over and over again wasn't good enough.
Overall, when neither Ibaka nor Gasol were on the court (50 minutes), the Raptors were OffRtg 109.4 and DefRtg 97.9, so NetRtg +11.5. Maybe there were some weaker offensive stretches in there, and/or some weaker defensive stretches. But overall...









