dice wrote:dougthonus wrote:Susan wrote:This is a stupid discussion. Fitzpatrick isn't getting traded and the Bears aren't moving off of Foles this season.
Agreed.Fitzpatrick is well known for being extremely hot and extremely cold. Taking a 6 game sample size and ignoring his decade + career is a real goofball way to look at the world. Give me the guy with the 27 TD/2INT season and the Big Fat Super Bowl Ring on his finger.
Yeah, I don't like Fitzpatrick either, but looking at a season 7 years ago and using it as a benchmark today in sports when you have had 7 years since then to show that it isn't repeatable, sustainable or expected in the future is a terrible way to look at anything.
Like I said, you could just group their aggregate numbers and Foles comes out on top. I agree we're not going to get Fitzpatrick, and we shouldn't want to get Fitzpatrick, and there's no reason to think Fitzpatrick is better.
career QBR (since its advent in 2006):
71.9 brees (9201 non-handoff snaps - age 27-41)
71.2 brady (8446 - age 29-43)
67.9 rodgers (7233 - age 25-37)
66.9 wilson (5051 - age 24-32)
64.7 big ben (7689 - age 24-38)
63.0 ryan (7874 - age 23-35)
62.1 rivers (8576 - age 25-39)
57.3 stafford (6554 - age 21-32))
56.9 newton (5375 - age 22-31)
54.6 fitz (5687 - age 26-38)
52.2 foles (2091)
Foles has a better TD/INT ratio by a decent margin, better completion percentage (barely), better QB rating (barely) and loses in QBR (barely). I don't know, Looking at their numbers over that time, I'd take Foles, but it's enough of a wash that I sure wouldn't go out of my way to acquire Foles if I had Fitzpatrick or the other way around.
Familiarity with our system is probably enough of an advantage for Foles to say he'd fit better with us than Fitzpatrick. Either way, these guys are both pedestrian QBs.


























