ImageImageImageImageImage

Clippers roster, what's next?

Moderators: og15, TrueLAfan

User avatar
esqtvd
RealGM
Posts: 12,189
And1: 4,864
Joined: Jun 24, 2017
Location: LA LA LA LAND
Contact:
     

Re: Clippers roster, what's next? 

Post#141 » by esqtvd » Sun Nov 1, 2020 12:55 am

Roscoe Sheed wrote:
TucsonClip wrote:
TheNewEra wrote:

You could of played Green with Noah and even Green struggled with Jokic because he was trying to check him when Trez couldn’t and still the bench flopped


The entire point of playing Green and having him body Jokic, is to downsize and stretch him and the rest of the Nuggets defense out to the perimeter. Dropping Noah into that group doesnt make much sense. Even if you think he can defend Jokic, why not just play Zu, whom actually proved he could make a defensive impact, more?
zu needed to rest here and there and perhaps had foul trouble( I can’t remember now)



We didn't lose Game 7 at the 5. Jokic only scored 16 points in 40 minutes on 5-13 shooting. Trezz scored 20 on 7-10 in 26 minutes. Green played 24 minutes [11 points], Zubac 14 [6].


The reason we lost was because Kawhi and PG were 10-38 [22%]. We lost because Kawhi scored 0 points in the 4th quarter. Because PG scored 0 points in the 4th quarter, a combined 0-10.

This is what posterity needs to remember. In fact we've already forgot. :roll: There is NO example in NBA history to match this.


https://www.espn.com/nba/playbyplay?gameId=401242800
Image Are We Having Fun Yet?
Roscoe Sheed
RealGM
Posts: 11,396
And1: 5,308
Joined: May 01, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Clippers roster, what's next? 

Post#142 » by Roscoe Sheed » Sun Nov 1, 2020 4:50 am

esqtvd wrote:
Roscoe Sheed wrote:
TucsonClip wrote:
The entire point of playing Green and having him body Jokic, is to downsize and stretch him and the rest of the Nuggets defense out to the perimeter. Dropping Noah into that group doesnt make much sense. Even if you think he can defend Jokic, why not just play Zu, whom actually proved he could make a defensive impact, more?
zu needed to rest here and there and perhaps had foul trouble( I can’t remember now)



We didn't lose Game 7 at the 5. Jokic only scored 16 points in 40 minutes on 5-13 shooting. Trezz scored 20 on 7-10 in 26 minutes. Green played 24 minutes [11 points], Zubac 14 [6].


The reason we lost was because Kawhi and PG were 10-38 [22%]. We lost because Kawhi scored 0 points in the 4th quarter. Because PG scored 0 points in the 4th quarter, a combined 0-10.

This is what posterity needs to remember. In fact we've already forgot. :roll: There is NO example in NBA history to match this.


https://www.espn.com/nba/playbyplay?gameId=401242800

True for game 7 but they also blew games 5 and 6.

Murray played well toward the end of the series, but we all know Jokic gave the clippers a lot of problems and compromised their defense consistently
User avatar
esqtvd
RealGM
Posts: 12,189
And1: 4,864
Joined: Jun 24, 2017
Location: LA LA LA LAND
Contact:
     

Re: Clippers roster, what's next? 

Post#143 » by esqtvd » Sun Nov 1, 2020 7:04 am

Roscoe Sheed wrote:
esqtvd wrote:
Roscoe Sheed wrote:zu needed to rest here and there and perhaps had foul trouble( I can’t remember now)



We didn't lose Game 7 at the 5. Jokic only scored 16 points in 40 minutes on 5-13 shooting. Trezz scored 20 on 7-10 in 26 minutes. Green played 24 minutes [11 points], Zubac 14 [6].


The reason we lost was because Kawhi and PG were 10-38 [22%]. We lost because Kawhi scored 0 points in the 4th quarter. Because PG scored 0 points in the 4th quarter, a combined 0-10.

This is what posterity needs to remember. In fact we've already forgot. :roll: There is NO example in NBA history to match this.


https://www.espn.com/nba/playbyplay?gameId=401242800

True for game 7 but they also blew games 5 and 6.

Murray played well toward the end of the series, but we all know Jokic gave the clippers a lot of problems and compromised their defense consistently


Acknowledged, but it's not worth dissecting Games 5 and 6. Zubac played 30 minutes in each. Trezz played around 15. The narrative is garbage.


Game 7 is winning time. Championship time. Many champions have been taken to a Game 7.


There are excuses and then there are reasons. Games 5 and 6 are excuses.


We didn't lose Game 7 at the 5. Jokic only scored 16 points in 40 minutes on 5-13 shooting. Trezz scored 20 on 7-10 in 26 minutes. Green played 24 minutes [11 points], Zubac 14 [6].

The reason we lost was because Kawhi and PG were 10-38 [22%]. We lost because Kawhi scored 0 points in the 4th quarter. Because PG scored 0 points in the 4th quarter, a combined 0-10.

...

There is NO example in NBA history to match this.




No team ever survived such a gutless collapse by its two main players in NBA history. It's time to face the fact.
Image Are We Having Fun Yet?
jengmann3
Sophomore
Posts: 158
And1: 172
Joined: Sep 18, 2020

Re: Clippers roster, what's next? 

Post#144 » by jengmann3 » Sun Nov 1, 2020 2:12 pm

I agree that PG and Kawhi had a terrible Game 7. You have to hope that motivates them, and they learn that you simply can't perform like that in a series clinching game as the team's best players. Its fair criticism and I agree with the point 100%. I just think in Game 7's anything can happen. It's like the 2016 Warriors. People did kill Steph for his performance in Game 7, but it was fair to acknowledge that Draymond's suspension and Bogut's injury were key contributors to them losing as well. Similarly, 2016 Thunder, I blamed KD for the loss, but he actually played fine in Game 7. I blame him for playing horribly in Game 6 at home, which he shot like 10-30something and legit just looked off. 2019,

And I agree that offensively the Clips were bad in the second half of Games 5-7 but I do think it was in part because of foul trouble and taking the ball out because of their terrible defense.

I guess when I think about what's next with this team, I just hope that they will live up to the defensive identity/vision people had when they put them together. I thought they struggled in the playoffs defending not only point guards (Murray, Luka) and centers (KP, Jokic), but also those small/quick guards (Trey burke, Seth Curry, Monte Morris). Granted Patrick Beverly was not 100 % but he struggled even in the minutes that he played. I know Kawhi is in a lot of elite conversations, but I don't love asking him to facilitate, be the best scorer, and primary defender on every elite player (dude was guarding Jokic a lot in game 7). I'm interested in seeing the direction the team goes in the offseason at PF and point guard, because both positions will be key in trying to fine tune their defense.
TheNewEra
RealGM
Posts: 28,955
And1: 10,696
Joined: Aug 28, 2008
Location: Lob City
       

Re: Clippers roster, what's next? 

Post#145 » by TheNewEra » Sun Nov 1, 2020 10:32 pm

esqtvd wrote:
Roscoe Sheed wrote:
esqtvd wrote:

We didn't lose Game 7 at the 5. Jokic only scored 16 points in 40 minutes on 5-13 shooting. Trezz scored 20 on 7-10 in 26 minutes. Green played 24 minutes [11 points], Zubac 14 [6].


The reason we lost was because Kawhi and PG were 10-38 [22%]. We lost because Kawhi scored 0 points in the 4th quarter. Because PG scored 0 points in the 4th quarter, a combined 0-10.

This is what posterity needs to remember. In fact we've already forgot. :roll: There is NO example in NBA history to match this.


https://www.espn.com/nba/playbyplay?gameId=401242800

True for game 7 but they also blew games 5 and 6.

Murray played well toward the end of the series, but we all know Jokic gave the clippers a lot of problems and compromised their defense consistently


Acknowledged, but it's not worth dissecting Games 5 and 6. Zubac played 30 minutes in each. Trezz played around 15. The narrative is garbage.


Game 7 is winning time. Championship time. Many champions have been taken to a Game 7.


There are excuses and then there are reasons. Games 5 and 6 are excuses.


We didn't lose Game 7 at the 5. Jokic only scored 16 points in 40 minutes on 5-13 shooting. Trezz scored 20 on 7-10 in 26 minutes. Green played 24 minutes [11 points], Zubac 14 [6].

The reason we lost was because Kawhi and PG were 10-38 [22%]. We lost because Kawhi scored 0 points in the 4th quarter. Because PG scored 0 points in the 4th quarter, a combined 0-10.

...

There is NO example in NBA history to match this.




No team ever survived such a gutless collapse by its two main players in NBA history. It's time to face the fact.
Whenever Harrell touched the floor he was a net negative anchor that hurt the team and whether you want to admit it or not he cost us the series. We had a lead in game 7 and after some BS early points he came in the second quarter and killed momentum AGAIN. He should of never received minutes and Frank Vogel would of benched him for the betterment of the team
User avatar
esqtvd
RealGM
Posts: 12,189
And1: 4,864
Joined: Jun 24, 2017
Location: LA LA LA LAND
Contact:
     

Re: Clippers roster, what's next? 

Post#146 » by esqtvd » Tue Nov 3, 2020 3:35 am

TheNewEra wrote:
esqtvd wrote:
Roscoe Sheed wrote:True for game 7 but they also blew games 5 and 6.

Murray played well toward the end of the series, but we all know Jokic gave the clippers a lot of problems and compromised their defense consistently


Acknowledged, but it's not worth dissecting Games 5 and 6. Zubac played 30 minutes in each. Trezz played around 15. The narrative is garbage.


Game 7 is winning time. Championship time. Many champions have been taken to a Game 7.


There are excuses and then there are reasons. Games 5 and 6 are excuses.


We didn't lose Game 7 at the 5. Jokic only scored 16 points in 40 minutes on 5-13 shooting. Trezz scored 20 on 7-10 in 26 minutes. Green played 24 minutes [11 points], Zubac 14 [6].

The reason we lost was because Kawhi and PG were 10-38 [22%]. We lost because Kawhi scored 0 points in the 4th quarter. Because PG scored 0 points in the 4th quarter, a combined 0-10.

...

There is NO example in NBA history to match this.




No team ever survived such a gutless collapse by its two main players in NBA history. It's time to face the fact.
Whenever Harrell touched the floor he was a net negative anchor that hurt the team and whether you want to admit it or not he cost us the series. We had a lead in game 7 and after some BS early points he came in the second quarter and killed momentum AGAIN. He should of never received minutes and Frank Vogel would of benched him for the betterment of the team



OK let's review:


Trezz scored 20 points in 26 minutes in Game 7 on 7-10 shooting. Jokic was held to 16 points in 40 minutes on 5-13. But our 7th-highest paid player cost us the series.

Not our 2 highest-paid superstars who scored 22 points COMBINED in 82 minutes and ZERO points in the 4th quarter COMBINED on 0-10 shooting with 3 turnovers. But our 7th-highest paid player cost us the series.

Provably the most disgusting performance in a Game 7 by a superstar in NBA history---let alone TWO. But our 7th-highest paid player cost us the series.
Image Are We Having Fun Yet?
TheNewEra
RealGM
Posts: 28,955
And1: 10,696
Joined: Aug 28, 2008
Location: Lob City
       

Re: Clippers roster, what's next? 

Post#147 » by TheNewEra » Tue Nov 3, 2020 3:11 pm

esqtvd wrote:
TheNewEra wrote:
esqtvd wrote:
Acknowledged, but it's not worth dissecting Games 5 and 6. Zubac played 30 minutes in each. Trezz played around 15. The narrative is garbage.


Game 7 is winning time. Championship time. Many champions have been taken to a Game 7.


There are excuses and then there are reasons. Games 5 and 6 are excuses.






No team ever survived such a gutless collapse by its two main players in NBA history. It's time to face the fact.
Whenever Harrell touched the floor he was a net negative anchor that hurt the team and whether you want to admit it or not he cost us the series. We had a lead in game 7 and after some BS early points he came in the second quarter and killed momentum AGAIN. He should of never received minutes and Frank Vogel would of benched him for the betterment of the team



OK let's review:


Trezz scored 20 points in 26 minutes in Game 7 on 7-10 shooting. Jokic was held to 16 points in 40 minutes on 5-13. But our 7th-highest paid player cost us the series.

Not our 2 highest-paid superstars who scored 22 points COMBINED in 82 minutes and ZERO points in the 4th quarter COMBINED on 0-10 shooting with 3 turnovers. But our 7th-highest paid player cost us the series.

Provably the most disgusting performance in a Game 7 by a superstar in NBA history---let alone TWO. But our 7th-highest paid player cost us the series.


Game 7 / 2nd quarter 4:12 left in the quarter
Clippers lead 51-41
Harrell checks in for Green we end the quarter up by 2.

I don’t care if Zubac and Green both got COVID you don’t play with fire with the minutes of Harrell. Those big negative swings with leads that demoralize the team and we can’t stop the bleeding no matter what because we don’t have the focus or leadership. Kawhi and PG could of been better but there is no was of getting around the deflated feeling of the late second quarter

I posted it on Twitter those early 12 points by Harrell in the first half.We fell into fools gold because Doc will lean in with heavy minutes and we are about to get waxed.
NickP
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,322
And1: 963
Joined: Aug 20, 2020
 

Re: Clippers roster, what's next? 

Post#148 » by NickP » Tue Nov 3, 2020 4:07 pm

TheNewEra wrote:
esqtvd wrote:
TheNewEra wrote: Whenever Harrell touched the floor he was a net negative anchor that hurt the team and whether you want to admit it or not he cost us the series. We had a lead in game 7 and after some BS early points he came in the second quarter and killed momentum AGAIN. He should of never received minutes and Frank Vogel would of benched him for the betterment of the team



OK let's review:


Trezz scored 20 points in 26 minutes in Game 7 on 7-10 shooting. Jokic was held to 16 points in 40 minutes on 5-13. But our 7th-highest paid player cost us the series.

Not our 2 highest-paid superstars who scored 22 points COMBINED in 82 minutes and ZERO points in the 4th quarter COMBINED on 0-10 shooting with 3 turnovers. But our 7th-highest paid player cost us the series.

Provably the most disgusting performance in a Game 7 by a superstar in NBA history---let alone TWO. But our 7th-highest paid player cost us the series.


Game 7 / 2nd quarter 4:12 left in the quarter
Clippers lead 51-41
Harrell checks in for Green we end the quarter up by 2.

I don’t care if Zubac and Green both got COVID you don’t play with fire with the minutes of Harrell. Those big negative swings with leads that demoralize the team and we can’t stop the bleeding no matter what because we don’t have the focus or leadership. Kawhi and PG could of been better but there is no was of getting around the deflated feeling of the late second quarter

I posted it on Twitter those early 12 points by Harrell in the first half.We fell into fools gold because Doc will lean in with heavy minutes and we are about to get waxed.

Your post is right on the money but i fully expect the resident Doc apologist to come to Doc's rescue.
User avatar
esqtvd
RealGM
Posts: 12,189
And1: 4,864
Joined: Jun 24, 2017
Location: LA LA LA LAND
Contact:
     

Re: Clippers roster, what's next? 

Post#149 » by esqtvd » Tue Nov 3, 2020 6:24 pm

TheNewEra wrote:
esqtvd wrote:
TheNewEra wrote: Whenever Harrell touched the floor he was a net negative anchor that hurt the team and whether you want to admit it or not he cost us the series. We had a lead in game 7 and after some BS early points he came in the second quarter and killed momentum AGAIN. He should of never received minutes and Frank Vogel would of benched him for the betterment of the team



OK let's review:


Trezz scored 20 points in 26 minutes in Game 7 on 7-10 shooting. Jokic was held to 16 points in 40 minutes on 5-13. But our 7th-highest paid player cost us the series.

Not our 2 highest-paid superstars who scored 22 points COMBINED in 82 minutes and ZERO points in the 4th quarter COMBINED on 0-10 shooting with 3 turnovers. But our 7th-highest paid player cost us the series.

Provably the most disgusting performance in a Game 7 by a superstar in NBA history---let alone TWO. But our 7th-highest paid player cost us the series.


Game 7 / 2nd quarter 4:12 left in the quarter
Clippers lead 51-41
Harrell checks in for Green we end the quarter up by 2.

I don’t care if Zubac and Green both got COVID you don’t play with fire with the minutes of Harrell. Those big negative swings with leads that demoralize the team and we can’t stop the bleeding no matter what because we don’t have the focus or leadership. Kawhi and PG could of been better but there is no was of getting around the deflated feeling of the late second quarter

I posted it on Twitter those early 12 points by Harrell in the first half.We fell into fools gold because Doc will lean in with heavy minutes and we are about to get waxed.



The narrative dies hard. The worst Game 7 performance in NBA HISTORY by TWO superstars and still harping on Trezz. You can cherry-pick that one stretch in the 2nd quarter but the scoreboard says Trezz was minus-8 in 26 minutes; Zubac was minus-10 in only 14.

But I do really appreciate you showing up with fresh facts and arguments in every post, instead of just trying to shout me down. That's how this is supposed to work. :-)


Trezz showed up for Game 7. Kawhi and PG didn't. Everything else is excuses.
Image Are We Having Fun Yet?
KL2
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,240
And1: 2,448
Joined: Jul 09, 2019
Location: California
     

Re: Clippers roster, what's next? 

Post#150 » by KL2 » Sun Nov 15, 2020 4:23 pm

Trade season begins Monday noon eastern so maybe we’ll see if the Clippers have anything lined up yet.
nickhx2
RealGM
Posts: 10,576
And1: 6,476
Joined: Feb 13, 2014

Re: Clippers roster, what's next? 

Post#151 » by nickhx2 » Sun Nov 15, 2020 9:35 pm

i like that thus far rumors have been relatively quiet, aside from outlandish nonsense like westbrook coming to LA.

not that anyone knows for sure what's going to happen, but if the team was willing to excise doc, i expect they'll be jettisoning harrell as well. this offseason should be about taking out the trash.
NickP
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,322
And1: 963
Joined: Aug 20, 2020
 

Re: Clippers roster, what's next? 

Post#152 » by NickP » Mon Nov 16, 2020 3:22 pm

nickhx2 wrote:i like that thus far rumors have been relatively quiet, aside from outlandish nonsense like westbrook coming to LA.

not that anyone knows for sure what's going to happen, but if the team was willing to excise doc, i expect they'll be jettisoning harrell as well. this offseason should be about taking out the trash.

Exactly. Time to clean up the trash. Let's start with Trez.
KL2
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,240
And1: 2,448
Joined: Jul 09, 2019
Location: California
     

Re: Clippers roster, what's next? 

Post#153 » by KL2 » Mon Nov 16, 2020 6:40 pm

Unless OKC is rerouting Rubio to us he’s off the table now.
nickhx2
RealGM
Posts: 10,576
And1: 6,476
Joined: Feb 13, 2014

Re: Clippers roster, what's next? 

Post#154 » by nickhx2 » Mon Nov 16, 2020 6:49 pm

rubio was certainly one of my hopes, but seems like we'll have to be looking elsewhere for PG help.
User avatar
MartinToVaught
RealGM
Posts: 15,743
And1: 17,808
Joined: Oct 19, 2014
     

Re: Clippers roster, what's next? 

Post#155 » by MartinToVaught » Mon Nov 16, 2020 6:57 pm

OKC might end up flipping Rubio for more assets. On the other hand, I'd rather not see our front office get fleeced by Presti again, this time for a player who's realistically just okay.
Image
KL2
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,240
And1: 2,448
Joined: Jul 09, 2019
Location: California
     

Re: Clippers roster, what's next? 

Post#156 » by KL2 » Mon Nov 16, 2020 7:01 pm

Not sure how reliable Berman is but ...

Read on Twitter
User avatar
MartinToVaught
RealGM
Posts: 15,743
And1: 17,808
Joined: Oct 19, 2014
     

Re: Clippers roster, what's next? 

Post#157 » by MartinToVaught » Mon Nov 16, 2020 7:12 pm

Meh. There's no way we could match how much the Suns gave up for him, and at the end of the day, he's an injury-prone 35-year-old with one of the worst contracts in the league and a weak playoff resume. I had seen more than enough of CP3 by the last season of Lob City and I'm totally fine with him not coming back.

I suspect the Suns will be joining the Clippers and Rockets in the "Fleeced by Presti" Club.
Image
Captain Ballmer
Rookie
Posts: 1,219
And1: 989
Joined: Jul 14, 2015
Location: Istanbul
   

Re: Clippers roster, what's next? 

Post#158 » by Captain Ballmer » Mon Nov 16, 2020 7:27 pm

Presti should resign and start new a career on finance, become a fund manager-professional trader.
2024-25 Clippers W/L Count against OKC, HOU, PHX, MIN (0-14)
2024-25 Clippers W/L Count against rest of NBA (43-18)
Wammy Giveaway
Veteran
Posts: 2,553
And1: 1,162
Joined: Jul 30, 2013

I'm Alright With No Chris Paul 

Post#159 » by Wammy Giveaway » Mon Nov 16, 2020 7:45 pm

With the Suns acquiring Paul instead, Pheonix has become relevant again. They're guaranteed a playoff spot. But it also provides the Clippers with a major test: defeating somebody they truly loved.

Also, note this: the Clipper's first ever 2nd round appearance had them losing to the Suns in 7 games. The year they had Brand-Cassell could be considered their best playoff performance ever, just because they man-handled the Nuggets in the 1st round needing only five games, whereas the new-look Clippers needed all seven games to win their 1st round series, and had frequent, if not uncharacteristic, meltdowns in the most inopportune of times. Maybe having to face their former true savior on the first 2nd round opponent they've ever lost to (not counting Buffalo Brave days) could be what motivates Clippers into finally caring about getting past the 2nd round.

I still think Clippers stick with roster they have, though I've read they made trade Lou Williams for a draft pick:

Read on Twitter


Read on Twitter
User avatar
madmaxmedia
RealGM
Posts: 12,594
And1: 7,516
Joined: Jun 22, 2001
Location: SoCal
     

Re: Clippers roster, what's next? 

Post#160 » by madmaxmedia » Mon Nov 16, 2020 7:50 pm

MartinToVaught wrote:Meh. There's no way we could match how much the Suns gave up for him, and at the end of the day, he's an injury-prone 35-year-old with one of the worst contracts in the league and a weak playoff resume. I had seen more than enough of CP3 by the last season of Lob City and I'm totally fine with him not coming back.

I suspect the Suns will be joining the Clippers and Rockets in the "Fleeced by Presti" Club.


I 100% agree we weren't getting him, but it's crazy if true that CP3's first choice was here.

Return to Los Angeles Clippers