stuporman wrote:
Name one progressive policy that is 'evil'.....
Making a concerted effort to give black and brown people assistance in the pursuit of equality.
Moderators: j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
stuporman wrote:
Name one progressive policy that is 'evil'.....

stuporman wrote:Oscirus wrote:GONYK wrote:Food for thought...
?s=19
?s=19
?s=19
Maybe things aren't as simple as they seem?
I keep saying the polls have to be questioned from here on out. Yea, not all progressive stuff is evil as some say, not all of it is super popular as some think either.[/quote
Name one progressive policy that is 'evil'.....
Jimmit79 wrote:At this point I want RJ to get paid
Oscirus wrote:stuporman wrote:Oscirus wrote:
I keep saying the polls have to be questioned from here on out. Yea, not all progressive stuff is evil as some say, not all of it is super popular as some think either.[/quote
Name one progressive policy that is 'evil'.....
Bad phrasing, not evil but toxic to voters.
Taking on your challenge the term : "defunding police" while the policy isnt bad, that phrasing leaves alot to desire.
?
stuporman wrote:Oscirus wrote:stuporman wrote:I keep saying the polls have to be questioned from here on out. Yea, not all progressive stuff is evil as some say, not all of it is super popular as some think either.[/quote
Name one progressive policy that is 'evil'.....
Bad phrasing, not evil but toxic to voters.
Taking on your challenge the term : "defunding police" while the policy isnt bad, that phrasing leaves alot to desire.
Bad phrasing?... you mean like calling a something evil when it isn't actually evil?
Jimmit79 wrote:At this point I want RJ to get paid
Oscirus wrote:stuporman wrote:Oscirus wrote:Bad phrasing, not evil but toxic to voters.
Taking on your challenge the term : "defunding police" while the policy isnt bad, that phrasing leaves alot to desire.
Bad phrasing?... you mean like calling a something evil when it isn't actually evil?
I literally just said that was bad phrasing. Is there an echo in here?
mpharris36 wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:mpharris36 wrote:
to be fair though the economy was doing well regardless of if you were on the Trump inherited it camp or beleive he was helping it pre-pandamic. So the theory would be if Biden does his job (which he says he will) in controlling the pandemic then we shuold get back to a strong economy again. Without major policy changes.
I was just pointing out that the markets probably like the consistency of Biden because there is no doubt Trump was a serious loose canoon. Which was reflected when Biden started to take a firm lead in winning the presidency.
By what metrics are you using to conclude that the economy was strong before the pandemic because I would argue that in fact it wasn't. It was clearly very unstable. We've been hitting major bubble burst and recessions almost every 7 years. Like clockwork. This is as a result of our current capitalist system.
We have different views on the success of the economy (median house income up, poverty rate down, unemployment rate lowest since the 60's) and don't want to specifically want to derail and get into a capitalist system vs social system debate because lets be honest we would be dug in the trenches there![]()
But you aren't wrong a capitalist system you have the potential for unstable effects to it because its giving all the power to the people and the markets. I however specifically would take that any day over the gov't getting there hands on trying to overly control it. If you want to chat more via PM wingo I would be happy to do that as well.
Oscirus wrote:stuporman wrote:Oscirus wrote:
I keep saying the polls have to be questioned from here on out. Yea, not all progressive stuff is evil as some say, not all of it is super popular as some think either.[/quote
Name one progressive policy that is 'evil'.....
Bad phrasing, not evil but toxic to voters.
Taking on your challenge the term : "defunding police" while the policy isnt bad, that phrasing leaves alot to desire.
mpharris36 wrote:Capn'O wrote:mpharris36 wrote:
They did say wallstreet is loving this assuming the republicans can keep the senate. They will have a president that wont recklessly tweet that will make the stock market less volatile but then they won't have to worry about large corporate taxes being passed. It's like there dream scenario.
And renewables will get the biggest pop, as they already have, as a big support plan is in the works.
I have PLUG stock and an ETF that features renewables. Psyched for tomorrow.
I have no issues with investing in renewables. Companies can't survive without that approach nowadays. Just for perspective I have worked in CPG finance my whole working life. Consumers care about ingrediants and sustainable development goals (whether that is biodegradable cartons and cases). I don't think you would be able to survive in this competitive capatilistic CPG market without it.
I have a ton of experience in this field and its not all about price price price anymore. You have many different type of consumers that care not only what they are putting into there body/pets bodies but how it is effecting the environement as well.

HarthorneWingo wrote:mpharris36 wrote:Capn'O wrote:
And renewables will get the biggest pop, as they already have, as a big support plan is in the works.
I have PLUG stock and an ETF that features renewables. Psyched for tomorrow.
I have no issues with investing in renewables. Companies can't survive without that approach nowadays. Just for perspective I have worked in CPG finance my whole working life. Consumers care about ingrediants and sustainable development goals (whether that is biodegradable cartons and cases). I don't think you would be able to survive in this competitive capatilistic CPG market without it.
I have a ton of experience in this field and its not all about price price price anymore. You have many different type of consumers that care not only what they are putting into there body/pets bodies but how it is effecting the environement as well.
What is CPG finance?
Pointgod wrote:Oscirus wrote:stuporman wrote:I keep saying the polls have to be questioned from here on out. Yea, not all progressive stuff is evil as some say, not all of it is super popular as some think either.[/quote
Name one progressive policy that is 'evil'.....
Bad phrasing, not evil but toxic to voters.
Taking on your challenge the term : "defunding police" while the policy isnt bad, that phrasing leaves alot to desire.
These are good points. And Biden actually ran on and talked about raising the minimum wage, but got beat in Florida. Does Bernie win Florida and Arizona running on his platform? I’m still certain people don’t vote on policy. Partisanship and tribalism is a bigger influencer. This tells me that Democrats could pass more Progressive legislation without paying a political price but they need to get ahead of the messaging.
Jimmit79 wrote:At this point I want RJ to get paid
Fat Kat wrote:
Jimmit79 wrote:At this point I want RJ to get paid
Oscirus wrote:Pointgod wrote:Oscirus wrote:Bad phrasing, not evil but toxic to voters.
Taking on your challenge the term : "defunding police" while the policy isnt bad, that phrasing leaves alot to desire.
These are good points. And Biden actually ran on and talked about raising the minimum wage, but got beat in Florida. Does Bernie win Florida and Arizona running on his platform? I’m still certain people don’t vote on policy. Partisanship and tribalism is a bigger influencer. This tells me that Democrats could pass more Progressive legislation without paying a political price but they need to get ahead of the messaging.
This is why nancy and her lieutenants need to step the **** down, they're one-sided in their approach to doing things.
And even though this is just going for clicks, theres this potential landmine https://www.businessinsider.com/aoc-says-she-may-quit-politics-dems-blame-progressives-losses-2020-11
Oscirus wrote:Fat Kat wrote:
Does he just say dumb **** for the sake of saying it? You're safe for six years, dont need to blow trump ( the guy who gave out your private number) anymore.

Capn'O wrote:
Pointgod wrote:Oscirus wrote:stuporman wrote:I keep saying the polls have to be questioned from here on out. Yea, not all progressive stuff is evil as some say, not all of it is super popular as some think either.[/quote
Name one progressive policy that is 'evil'.....
Bad phrasing, not evil but toxic to voters.
Taking on your challenge the term : "defunding police" while the policy isnt bad, that phrasing leaves alot to desire.
These are good points. And Biden actually ran on and talked about raising the minimum wage, but got beat in Florida. Does Bernie win Florida and Arizona running on his platform? I’m still certain people don’t vote on policy. Partisanship and tribalism is a bigger influencer. This tells me that Democrats could pass more Progressive legislation without paying a political price but they need to get ahead of the messaging.
