SA37 wrote:

Moderator: TyCobb
Shock Defeat wrote:An asian woman is less capable of achieving this, but not because of anything about her inherently. She is less capable of achieving this because outside systems and people exist to make it hard on her to achieve it. She didn't create the society which makes it hard on her, but she has had to overcome it. So the fact that she did achieve it is commendable.
Balllin wrote:Shock Defeat wrote:An asian woman is less capable of achieving this, but not because of anything about her inherently. She is less capable of achieving this because outside systems and people exist to make it hard on her to achieve it. She didn't create the society which makes it hard on her, but she has had to overcome it. So the fact that she did achieve it is commendable.
checking her background - her father was a financial analyst, while her mother was a banker. which implies high socio-economical status as well as high social capital. this immensely helped her to attend university of chicago, a top tier university. A degree from a local top tier university makes it exponentially more likely to become an intern with the local pro sports team chicago white sox. when reading her wikipedia, i do not get the impression that her gender played a hugely positive nor negative role in her getting that GM gig. So why make it about her gender?
i would claim that a low socio-economic status white male would have a harder path to becoming a pro sports GM than her personally.
xdrta+ wrote:
That's probably why white males, many of them "low socio-economic status" have been the norm as pro sports GMs for the past 100 years while she's the first woman. That makes sense.
Woodsanity wrote:Lets be honest with that resume she should have been hired earlier than thisbut this is good to hear. Always tougher when you are basically a pioneer.
Shock Defeat wrote:Balllin wrote:Shock Defeat wrote:It cheapens her accomplishment according to YOU. That's not what other people think when they hear "1st woman GM". Other people might actually look at her accomplishment as even more special than it is, including her. I'll wait until I hear something from her that indicates that she feels her accomplishment is "cheapened".
you are implicitly saying that being an asian woman makes her inherently less capable of achieving this, which in turn makes it extra remarkable that she has actually pulled it off. it sounds as if you were talking about a mentally disabled person that in spite of their disability has been able to solve a mathematical problem and due to their inherent disability needs extra admiration and acknowledgement for their feat. patronizing much?
An asian woman is less capable of achieving this, but not because of anything about her inherently. She is less capable of achieving this because outside systems and people exist to make it hard on her to achieve it. She didn't create the society which makes it hard on her, but she has had to overcome it. So the fact that she did achieve it is commendable.
Harry Garris wrote:Woodsanity wrote:Lets be honest with that resume she should have been hired earlier than thisbut this is good to hear. Always tougher when you are basically a pioneer.
Society is slow to change and is never going to develop at the pace that we young idealists want it to. Its better to be happy about the good changes that DO happen rather than being negative about everything, imo.
Andrew_M08 wrote:Instead of being congratulated for being the most qualified and fit for the job, she'll simply be commended for beingthe first woman in that position.
Neutral 123 wrote:Harry Garris wrote:Woodsanity wrote:Lets be honest with that resume she should have been hired earlier than thisbut this is good to hear. Always tougher when you are basically a pioneer.
Society is slow to change and is never going to develop at the pace that we young idealists want it to. Its better to be happy about the good changes that DO happen rather than being negative about everything, imo.
There's a very good reason for that. The change young idealists want has often been tried and failed already. Tradition exists for a reason, and that reason is that the countless millions that have lived before, figured out this was the best way to go and sometimes for reasons even they didn't understand.
There's this odd assumption that if it weren't for sinister outside forces that everyone would be equally represented in every endeavor.
But that hasn't happened anywhere or any time in Earth's history.
The MLB is in America and America has a small Asian population, that's a factor. Women, despite similar access to sports, don't have nearly the same interest in sports as men, that's a factor. Women, being the ones who give birth, and generally not wanting to sacrifice a home life, not wanting to sacrifice having and caring for her children, certain careers are going to be far less palatable, that's a huge factor.
There's nothing unusual or sinister about some made up delay to the rise of a woman to this position. She's just a very intelligent, hard working and dedicated woman who chose a field most women aren't interested in. An interesting story or curiosity perhaps but that's it. No need for so much of the virtue signaling that cheapens what she's done.
Neutral 123 wrote:Harry Garris wrote:Woodsanity wrote:Lets be honest with that resume she should have been hired earlier than thisbut this is good to hear. Always tougher when you are basically a pioneer.
Society is slow to change and is never going to develop at the pace that we young idealists want it to. Its better to be happy about the good changes that DO happen rather than being negative about everything, imo.
There's a very good reason for that. The change young idealists want has often been tried and failed already. Tradition exists for a reason, and that reason is that the countless millions that have lived before, figured out this was the best way to go and sometimes for reasons even they didn't understand.
There's this odd assumption that if it weren't for sinister outside forces that everyone would be equally represented in every endeavor.
But that hasn't happened anywhere or any time in Earth's history.
The MLB is in America and America has a small Asian population, that's a factor. Women, despite similar access to sports, don't have nearly the same interest in sports as men, that's a factor. Women, being the ones who give birth, and generally not wanting to sacrifice a home life, not wanting to sacrifice having and caring for her children, certain careers are going to be far less palatable, that's a huge factor.
There's nothing unusual or sinister about some made up delay to the rise of a woman to this position. She's just a very intelligent, hard working and dedicated woman who chose a field most women aren't interested in. An interesting story or curiosity perhaps but that's it. No need for so much of the virtue signaling that cheapens what she's done.
KqWIN wrote:It's notable that Dirk was the first European NBA MVP and the greatest European basketball player ever. The acknowledgement of this historical context does not cheapen his accomplishment, nor does "being European" trump his playing career. It actually is possible to appreciate someone's accomplishments in a different context because they did it in a special context. Europeans can look up to Dirk and be proud of him because they some kind of kinship with him. Everyone has felt this. It's like someone from your town or state going on to do big things.
Same thing here for Kim Ng. She's the first female and the first Asian American GM. It is notable, and very impressive to me. Both women and Asian Americans as a whole have a hard time achieving leadership positions in the American workplace. Unfortunately, whenever a woman enters a "male" space people lose their mind. Some can only see woman in a certain context, and their manly sports don't include them. It's a shame, but it does make me appreciate the historical context of this more.
Neutral 123 wrote:Harry Garris wrote:Woodsanity wrote:Lets be honest with that resume she should have been hired earlier than thisbut this is good to hear. Always tougher when you are basically a pioneer.
Society is slow to change and is never going to develop at the pace that we young idealists want it to. Its better to be happy about the good changes that DO happen rather than being negative about everything, imo.
There's a very good reason for that. The change young idealists want has often been tried and failed already. Tradition exists for a reason, and that reason is that the countless millions that have lived before, figured out this was the best way to go and sometimes for reasons even they didn't understand.
There's this odd assumption that if it weren't for sinister outside forces that everyone would be equally represented in every endeavor.
But that hasn't happened anywhere or any time in Earth's history.
The MLB is in America and America has a small Asian population, that's a factor. Women, despite similar access to sports, don't have nearly the same interest in sports as men, that's a factor. Women, being the ones who give birth, and generally not wanting to sacrifice a home life, not wanting to sacrifice having and caring for her children, certain careers are going to be far less palatable, that's a huge factor.
There's nothing unusual or sinister about some made up delay to the rise of a woman to this position. She's just a very intelligent, hard working and dedicated woman who chose a field most women aren't interested in. An interesting story or curiosity perhaps but that's it. No need for so much of the virtue signaling that cheapens what she's done.
Woodsanity wrote:Neutral 123 wrote:Harry Garris wrote:
Society is slow to change and is never going to develop at the pace that we young idealists want it to. Its better to be happy about the good changes that DO happen rather than being negative about everything, imo.
There's a very good reason for that. The change young idealists want has often been tried and failed already. Tradition exists for a reason, and that reason is that the countless millions that have lived before, figured out this was the best way to go and sometimes for reasons even they didn't understand.
There's this odd assumption that if it weren't for sinister outside forces that everyone would be equally represented in every endeavor.
But that hasn't happened anywhere or any time in Earth's history.
The MLB is in America and America has a small Asian population, that's a factor. Women, despite similar access to sports, don't have nearly the same interest in sports as men, that's a factor. Women, being the ones who give birth, and generally not wanting to sacrifice a home life, not wanting to sacrifice having and caring for her children, certain careers are going to be far less palatable, that's a huge factor.
There's nothing unusual or sinister about some made up delay to the rise of a woman to this position. She's just a very intelligent, hard working and dedicated woman who chose a field most women aren't interested in. An interesting story or curiosity perhaps but that's it. No need for so much of the virtue signaling that cheapens what she's done.
This isn't about why women generally wouldn't be interested in trying for the GM position.
Its about how someone with 30+ years of experience on top tier teams didn't get a GM position for now. Passed up for unqualified, white male GMs with little to no experience. People have been saying that she was a great GM candidate since the early 2000s but it took 15-20 years for her finally to get a job.
So naturally, her race and gender played a big role. With her credentials if she were a white male she would have gotten the job ages ago. Asians have it hard in America. Most minorities have lower standards to get into top colleges.
Asians actually have the opposite problem, they are discriminated against and face higher standards than whites and other minorities when applying for colleges since "too many" Asians are in top colleges. This is just one of many examples.
Harry Garris wrote:Neutral 123 wrote:Harry Garris wrote:
Society is slow to change and is never going to develop at the pace that we young idealists want it to. Its better to be happy about the good changes that DO happen rather than being negative about everything, imo.
There's a very good reason for that. The change young idealists want has often been tried and failed already. Tradition exists for a reason, and that reason is that the countless millions that have lived before, figured out this was the best way to go and sometimes for reasons even they didn't understand.
There's this odd assumption that if it weren't for sinister outside forces that everyone would be equally represented in every endeavor.
But that hasn't happened anywhere or any time in Earth's history.
The MLB is in America and America has a small Asian population, that's a factor. Women, despite similar access to sports, don't have nearly the same interest in sports as men, that's a factor. Women, being the ones who give birth, and generally not wanting to sacrifice a home life, not wanting to sacrifice having and caring for her children, certain careers are going to be far less palatable, that's a huge factor.
There's nothing unusual or sinister about some made up delay to the rise of a woman to this position. She's just a very intelligent, hard working and dedicated woman who chose a field most women aren't interested in. An interesting story or curiosity perhaps but that's it. No need for so much of the virtue signaling that cheapens what she's done.
Yeah I'm realistic about that and also realize that just because I want a certain societal change to happen doesn't mean I'm entitled to it.
Return to The General MLB Board