erlim wrote:Bankshot wrote:fleet wrote:He's 19, I’ll be mildly surprised if he doesn’t settle in at 6’8-6’9 235
Exactly, who else do we know with those dimensions?
Michael Beasley. But he has an above average offensive game.
Jamal Mashburn
Moderators: HomoSapien, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23
erlim wrote:Bankshot wrote:fleet wrote:He's 19, I’ll be mildly surprised if he doesn’t settle in at 6’8-6’9 235
Exactly, who else do we know with those dimensions?
Michael Beasley. But he has an above average offensive game.
fleet wrote:Brothaman33 wrote:fleet wrote:At his size, rare athletic tools. How many guys in the league can compare at any one time? A few.
He is 6'7 (some have him at 6'8) 220 lbs.
There are a ton of guys at that size AND at his athleticism that work at Best But after flaming out.
If you look at a player for just his upside...I don't see enough upside. If he completely maxes out, like reaches the fullest of potential, I still don't know how good that is.
Not one highlight shows any level of advanced ballhandling, of playmaking ability, of a quick shot release, of ANY standout trait.
Again, I'm willing to wait it out, cuz I will give tge benefit of the doubt but... I don't know if the best Patrick Williams can be is better then who will be drafted behind him.
He's 19, I’ll be mildly surprised if he doesn’t settle in at 6’8-6’9 235
cjbulls wrote:Brothaman33 wrote:D_GoLow wrote:
Deng should be his floor.
If he gets to Deng level, we should all do cartwheels. A Deng level player at 4 in this draft is a complete success.
His floor is Derrick Williams, James Johnson, Nassir Little and every other semi-fluid athlete that doesn't produce in the NBA. The only thing he has going for him is he seems to have a good personality and work ethic, which some of the above lacked. Let's see if that makes the difference.
fleet wrote:erlim wrote:Bankshot wrote:
Exactly, who else do we know with those dimensions?
Michael Beasley. But he has an above average offensive game.
Jamal Mashburn
Brothaman33 wrote:fleet wrote:Brothaman33 wrote:
He is 6'7 (some have him at 6'8) 220 lbs.
There are a ton of guys at that size AND at his athleticism that work at Best But after flaming out.
If you look at a player for just his upside...I don't see enough upside. If he completely maxes out, like reaches the fullest of potential, I still don't know how good that is.
Not one highlight shows any level of advanced ballhandling, of playmaking ability, of a quick shot release, of ANY standout trait.
Again, I'm willing to wait it out, cuz I will give tge benefit of the doubt but... I don't know if the best Patrick Williams can be is better then who will be drafted behind him.
He's 19, I’ll be mildly surprised if he doesn’t settle in at 6’8-6’9 235
Yes but if he gets to 6'9 235 then he's a power forward who may struggle to keep up smaller players defensively...which was the whole reason he was drafted in the first place.
I'm down to be patient. He's 19 and will have the whole world coming at him, so 3 years minimum to see what ya got.
Brothaman33 wrote:fleet wrote:Brothaman33 wrote:I'll wait and give him time. Watching video though...
He is a child.
Like, eyes wide open, looks like his brain is moving 100 miles an hour. He has soooooooooo much to work on.
Also, he is a good athlete, don't get me wrong. But I do not see ELITE athleticism. Laterally, I don't see elite. Good, maybe great leaper. Good speed, not great. If your gonna draft a high upside athlete, he had better be a elite at it. I don't think he is. He turned 19 in August. We'll have to wait 3 years before we actually see what we have.
I'll wait...
At his size, rare athletic tools. How many guys in the league can compare at any one time? A few.
He is 6'7 (some have him at 6'8) 220 lbs.
There are a ton of guys at that size AND at his athleticism that work at Best But after flaming out.
If you look at a player for just his upside...I don't see enough upside. If he completely maxes out, like reaches the fullest of potential, I still don't know how good that is.
Not one highlight shows any level of advanced ballhandling, of playmaking ability, of a quick shot release, of ANY standout trait.
Again, I'm willing to wait it out, cuz I will give the benefit of the doubt but... I don't know if the best Patrick Williams can be is better then who will be drafted behind him.
Southpaw wrote:https://www.theringer.com/nba/2020/11/10/21556874/2020-nba-draft-patrick-williams-florida-state
Another good read on Williams. What I liked about this is his willingness to learn defense and his understanding/acknowledgement that as a freshman, he probably won't be the focal point of the offense with a veteran laden team so he focuses on where he can help the team.
As a prospect he reminds me a bit of Jaylen Brown. Big wing athletic wing who can guard 2-4 with offensive upside.
pylb wrote:
erlim wrote:fleet wrote:erlim wrote:
Michael Beasley. But he has an above average offensive game.
Jamal Mashburn
Well I was at the UC once when Jamal Mashburn lit up HOF’er Scottie Pippen for 50 points. So that’s something.
fleet wrote:Brothaman33 wrote:fleet wrote:He's 19, I’ll be mildly surprised if he doesn’t settle in at 6’8-6’9 235
Yes but if he gets to 6'9 235 then he's a power forward who may struggle to keep up smaller players defensively...which was the whole reason he was drafted in the first place.
I'm down to be patient. He's 19 and will have the whole world coming at him, so 3 years minimum to see what ya got.
Probably he’ll spend the majority of his 20s about 230 lbs
Jo Jo English wrote:erlim wrote:fleet wrote:Jamal Mashburn
Well I was at the UC once when Jamal Mashburn lit up HOF’er Scottie Pippen for 50 points. So that’s something.
I was there too! Jimmy Jackson had like 37 as well.
It was early in the 94/95 season, right?
(I swear I didn't look any of this up. How close was I?)
MGB8 wrote:Southpaw wrote:https://www.theringer.com/nba/2020/11/10/21556874/2020-nba-draft-patrick-williams-florida-state
Another good read on Williams. What I liked about this is his willingness to learn defense and his understanding/acknowledgement that as a freshman, he probably won't be the focal point of the offense with a veteran laden team so he focuses on where he can help the team.
As a prospect he reminds me a bit of Jaylen Brown. Big wing athletic wing who can guard 2-4 with offensive upside.
He doesn’t have Brown’s perimeter movement. More Nasir Little or RHJ or OG or, if he has grown a touch, Siakam. But Williams seems like a good, hard working kid, if nothing else. So while I don’t love the pick, I’ll certainly be rooting for him.
Brothaman33 wrote:fleet wrote:Brothaman33 wrote:I'll wait and give him time. Watching video though...
He is a child.
Like, eyes wide open, looks like his brain is moving 100 miles an hour. He has soooooooooo much to work on.
Also, he is a good athlete, don't get me wrong. But I do not see ELITE athleticism. Laterally, I don't see elite. Good, maybe great leaper. Good speed, not great. If your gonna draft a high upside athlete, he had better be a elite at it. I don't think he is. He turned 19 in August. We'll have to wait 3 years before we actually see what we have.
I'll wait...
At his size, rare athletic tools. How many guys in the league can compare at any one time? A few.
He is 6'7 (some have him at 6'8) 220 lbs.
There are a ton of guys at that size AND at his athleticism that work at Best But after flaming out.
If you look at a player for just his upside...I don't see enough upside. If he completely maxes out, like reaches the fullest of potential, I still don't know how good that is.
Not one highlight shows any level of advanced ballhandling, of playmaking ability, of a quick shot release, of ANY standout trait.
Again, I'm willing to wait it out, cuz I will give the benefit of the doubt but... I don't know if the best Patrick Williams can be is better then who will be drafted behind him.