CalamityX12 wrote:Good lord, Bane??? Boston walks out with Nesmeth and Bane! Lol that’s not fair ... great pick at the end IMO
Desmond Bane is headed to the Grizzlies.
Moderators: NyCeEvO, Rich Rane
CalamityX12 wrote:Good lord, Bane??? Boston walks out with Nesmeth and Bane! Lol that’s not fair ... great pick at the end IMO
MrDollarBills wrote:CalamityX12 wrote:Prokorov wrote:
Marks just made an outstanding trade for an elite young shooter and you are made because he didnt draft a guy who project to be a 10th man on a good team in maybe 3 years from now. If we want someone like bey we can get one for peanuts like how we got brown.
We wouldnt even of drafted bey because we need guys who can help us win during the Kyrie/KD window.
Yea KD wanted shamet, cause shamet is an elite shooter and guy who impacts the game. not bey, who you forget is on the team while he racks up DNPs and bounces back and forth between the d-league
We’ll see how great Shamet is when he’s the one often times sitting on the bench for cold shooting
He's a career 40% 3pt shooter my guy what are you talking about?
Paradise wrote:CalamityX12 wrote:Good lord, Bane??? Boston walks out with Nesmeth and Bane! Lol that’s not fair ... great pick at the end IMO
Desmond Bane is headed to the Grizzlies.
CalamityX12 wrote:Prokorov wrote:CalamityX12 wrote:Oh yea lol Temple wasn’t in my mind lol.. i already assumed his ass is grass(as should be). Prince best service is as a trade piece, he’s suppose to be what Bey can be but better.
I knew Bey before the bubble, limited all around prospects but Bey(along with others) was a prospect that filled the needs of what could make the team more successful and help key areas.
in 3 years bey may have helped us in a handful of minutes
shamet is helping us from day 1 for 20-25 minutes a game.
Guys like Shamet are super rare. There are alot of excellent knock down shooters. there are few who can shoot 40% from deep while coming off screens, off balance, hand in the face, little aird space, and then when you take away the deep look can put it on the floor, finish at the rim, and put pressure on the D beyond standing in the corner
he is like harris only with a 40 inch verticle. high bbiq and super pesky.
this should be a move nets fans are in love with.
Then why did the Clippers part with Shamet?
MrDollarBills wrote:Sharcm1 wrote:Everyone going on and on about how shamet is better than taking a player like Bey etc. I understand it. We know what shamet can do. But it’s not always about the better player. Sometimes it’s about the best fit and the need. And yes it seems that other moves will happen. But they haven’t happened yet. And if they don’t happen the the team is greatly missing a pf and defense sf. And will have many many guards. Didn’t everyone want to resign Tyler Johnson. Well not now. Is shamet better than Johnson ? Don’t forget as of right now we have Irving, Dinwiddie, levert, brown, plus if we keep Johnson and chioza. Now let’s add another guard. Yes moves are coming. But we don’t what they are.
Bey could go on to become an excellent pro, however, Shamet is a proven NBA commodity that fits a role on a team that is having it's offense designed by Mike D'Antoni. Think about it for a minute.
Paradise wrote:CalamityX12 wrote:Prokorov wrote:
in 3 years bey may have helped us in a handful of minutes
shamet is helping us from day 1 for 20-25 minutes a game.
Guys like Shamet are super rare. There are alot of excellent knock down shooters. there are few who can shoot 40% from deep while coming off screens, off balance, hand in the face, little aird space, and then when you take away the deep look can put it on the floor, finish at the rim, and put pressure on the D beyond standing in the corner
he is like harris only with a 40 inch verticle. high bbiq and super pesky.
this should be a move nets fans are in love with.
Then why did the Clippers part with Shamet?
Because they are retooling their team from the Doc Rivers era. He’s not a bad player but they want Kennard instead. I don’t think he’s a better player but he’s a refresher.
Sharcm1 wrote:Everyone going on and on about how shamet is better than taking a player like Bey etc. I understand it. We know what shamet can do. But it’s not always about the better player. Sometimes it’s about the best fit and the need. And yes it seems that other moves will happen. But they haven’t happened yet. And if they don’t happen the the team is greatly missing a pf and defense sf. And will have many many guards. Didn’t everyone want to resign Tyler Johnson. Well not now. Is shamet better than Johnson ? Don’t forget as of right now we have Irving, Dinwiddie, levert, brown, plus if we keep Johnson and chioza. Now let’s add another guard. Yes moves are coming. But we don’t what they are.
CalamityX12 wrote:MrDollarBills wrote:CalamityX12 wrote:We’ll see how great Shamet is when he’s the one often times sitting on the bench for cold shooting
He's a career 40% 3pt shooter my guy what are you talking about?
Wasn’t Morrow a high 40s shooter too?
CalamityX12 wrote:MrDollarBills wrote:Sharcm1 wrote:Everyone going on and on about how shamet is better than taking a player like Bey etc. I understand it. We know what shamet can do. But it’s not always about the better player. Sometimes it’s about the best fit and the need. And yes it seems that other moves will happen. But they haven’t happened yet. And if they don’t happen the the team is greatly missing a pf and defense sf. And will have many many guards. Didn’t everyone want to resign Tyler Johnson. Well not now. Is shamet better than Johnson ? Don’t forget as of right now we have Irving, Dinwiddie, levert, brown, plus if we keep Johnson and chioza. Now let’s add another guard. Yes moves are coming. But we don’t what they are.
Bey could go on to become an excellent pro, however, Shamet is a proven NBA commodity that fits a role on a team that is having it's offense designed by Mike D'Antoni. Think about it for a minute.
D’Antoni offense fails.... if we want to go that route, it fails... that’s why I’m hoping Nash adds his style and scheme to make it work....
Prokorov wrote:CalamityX12 wrote:MrDollarBills wrote:
Bey could go on to become an excellent pro, however, Shamet is a proven NBA commodity that fits a role on a team that is having it's offense designed by Mike D'Antoni. Think about it for a minute.
D’Antoni offense fails.... if we want to go that route, it fails... that’s why I’m hoping Nash adds his style and scheme to make it work....
How does it fail exactly? its been top 5 consistently (multiple times #1) in his tenure across multiple teams in 2 different eras. Its work in the NBA. its worked internationally.
His offense has had lesser teams take elite teams to the brink. His rockets too KDs warriors to 7 games. his suns took the Shaq/Kobe 3-peat lakers to 7 and may have won if not for a very controversial Amare suspension.
Lebron/KD/Steph/Kawhi have won like the last 10 titles and most of the last 10 tites were won by super teams with a top 3 player.
Saying D'antonis offense fails because it couldnt top GOAT players on GOAT superteams is silly.
Its not like the rockets/suns were winning 50 and 60 games and then getting upset in the first round. they have gotten deep in the playoffs consitently and pushed great teams to the birnk.
Sharcm1 wrote:Why the f is everyone making shamet out to be a superstar player. He’s a role player that played like crap in the bubble and in play offs. Go read the clippers board.
Prokorov wrote:CalamityX12 wrote:MrDollarBills wrote:
He's a career 40% 3pt shooter my guy what are you talking about?
Wasn’t Morrow a high 40s shooter too?
Morrow didnt have a 40 inch veticle.
Morrow wasnt an elite finisher at the rim
Morrow didnt move off ball the way shamet does
Morrow didnt pass like shamet does
Morrow wasnt as disruptive on D as shamet is with deflections/blocks
Reggie miller was also a 40% shooter while we are throwing out exagerated awful comparisons. You want a comparison to shamet? something between Joe Harris and Matt Barnes