YungKnicks wrote:Knicks should give Toppins teammate Jalen Crutcher a camp invite. 47/42/87 line15ppg 5apg
Obi already said he can see RJ being his Crutcher.
Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
YungKnicks wrote:Knicks should give Toppins teammate Jalen Crutcher a camp invite. 47/42/87 line15ppg 5apg

snadler wrote:Pelicans have Ball, Bledsoe and Hill at pg and Knicks can’t find one..
knickstape4ever wrote:YungKnicks wrote:Knicks should give Toppins teammate Jalen Crutcher a camp invite. 47/42/87 line15ppg 5apg
he's returning to school. also not sure he's even considered an NBA caliber prospect
robillionaire wrote:HerSports85 wrote:Due to current circumstances if there was a year to punt, this is it. No telling if we even have a complete season.
It’s a lot of “why don’t we just play the kids and live with the results” people that’s scared now that we may just play the kids and develop lol
I've always wanted to play the kids and tank.
My issue is that if this is the direction they take, what they did in the draft made absolutely no sense. They drafted older players and gave away the 33rd. A tanking team would have taken projects (maybe avdija and hampton perhaps) and used that 33rd pick instead of bringing in vets like alec burks. I thought they had a good draft if the context was that they were trying to win. If they're trying to tank I'm scratching my head at what they did
VirginiaKnickFan wrote:I just want to get rid of Randle in some way.
K-DOT wrote:If they wouldn't trade 3 picks to clear him then don't do itDLTGWH wrote:K-DOT wrote:I feel like you thought this up expecting me to have said we were gonna sign all the max guys, but when I didn't and answered your question of what I'd do by explaining the value of bad contracts you didn't have a reply
Cause otherwise this reply makes no sense.
Sent from my SM-G965U using RealGM mobile app
Ok I'll bite.
Unless Billy King has been hired by the Wiz, expecting any team to trade 3 FRPs that aren't highly protected without getting a superstar back is what's lunacy. Whats the Wiz's motivation for trading Wall exactly? They stink. They aren't attracting any big time free agents. So what are they doing with their saved $40M? Trade him for another disgruntled overpaid malcontent where you have to give much less to complete.
Imagine Knicks owed Julius Fumble 3/160. How would you feel if another team came calling Rose to give three unprotected FRPs to take on salary. Knicks probably better off sending orange julius home. And trying again the following year when he only has 2/80 left (and other year of rehab/health)
Only teams that actual trade FRPs to clear bad cap/players are teams in expected top 10. IMO 1 Wiz unprotected in 2023 is much more valuable than three protected Jazz picks, for example.
I don't know why you're under the impression we must trade for Wall and take whatever Washington gives us when it's not a good value for us.
Sent from my SM-G965U using RealGM mobile app
F N 11 wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:F N 11 wrote:Sell people? Lol you guys never been through a real rebuild and it’s clear y’all rather build a team through free agency.
You don’t even want a rebuild. You want the Knicks to sign a washed up Hayward
To the right deal yes. We don’t have a SF if RJ is not playing there. Knox is still a question Mark. You only sign guys if it makes sense. Not because you want to just throw money away.


knickstape4ever wrote:Traveyknicks23 wrote:Spree2Houston wrote:We’re not going to make any big signings. We’re saving for 2021
And selling people on what?
they don't really need to sell anybody on anything, they're the Knicks + arenas will be empty/limited capacity
if they continue to avoid major signings its because of 2 things 1) weak FA class 2) strong 2021 draft
but if you need to be sold, how about this: right now, we're looking like a bottom 5 team, which would put us in position to land a very good pick. Obviously, getting #1 and Cade would be great, but the class is deep and there's BJ Boston, Jalen Green, and Ziaire Williams, etc. After getting 1, our young core would be very, very strong.
I think we're 1 draft away from the Knicks turning things around

F N 11 wrote:VirginiaKnickFan wrote:I just want to get rid of Randle in some way.
This please! Get this selfish guy off my team. Had a whole chance to be a playmaker and chose to not pass out of double teams like Amare.
F N 11 wrote:robillionaire wrote:F N 11 wrote:Sell people? Lol you guys never been through a real rebuild and it’s clear y’all rather build a team through free agency.
this isn't a real rebuild, look at what OKC is doing for an example of a real rebuild
No, that’s called cleaning house and not caring about this season. They have Shai and that’s it. We have Mitch, RJ, Obi, and others. It’s clear there’s a lot of people who don’t like their own players. Just don’t hop on the bandwagon when players look really good this year with competent coaching.

robillionaire wrote:HerSports85 wrote:Due to current circumstances if there was a year to punt, this is it. No telling if we even have a complete season.
It’s a lot of “why don’t we just play the kids and live with the results” people that’s scared now that we may just play the kids and develop lol
I've always wanted to play the kids and tank.
My issue is that if this is the direction they take, what they did in the draft made absolutely no sense. They drafted older players and gave away the 33rd. A tanking team would have taken projects (maybe avdija and hampton perhaps) and used that 33rd pick instead of bringing in vets like alec burks. I thought they had a good draft if the context was that they were trying to win. If they're trying to tank I'm scratching my head at what they did
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:Why is everyone talking about the 2021 free agency class? We're not going to be a player in that one, the top guys are:
Giannis
LeBron
Kawhi
PG13
Gobert
Let's be real here, we're not getting any of these guys, and we wouldn't want Gobert. Please let the Giannis dream go, he either signs the supermax with the Bucks or has a chance to play with Luka, why the hell would he pick us over that?
3toheadmelo wrote:F N 11 wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:You don’t even want a rebuild. You want the Knicks to sign a washed up Hayward
To the right deal yes. We don’t have a SF if RJ is not playing there. Knox is still a question Mark. You only sign guys if it makes sense. Not because you want to just throw money away.
It doesn’t make any sense for any deal if you want a rebuild. All he’s doing is taking away playing time from our youth.