The Chicago Bulls select forward Patrick Williams #4 overall.
Moderators: HomoSapien, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10
Re: The Chicago Bulls select forward Patrick Williams #4 overall.
- HomoSapien
- Senior Mod - Bulls
- Posts: 37,330
- And1: 30,367
- Joined: Aug 17, 2009
-
Re: The Chicago Bulls select forward Patrick Williams #4 overall.
The Spurs wanting him has to make everyone feel a little more optimistic about this. If you believe that Williams is the guy (and as Dinwiddie said, has no ceiling) then you're better off just taking him and not risking losing him by trading down. In my mind, you couldn't really have gone wrong with Deni, Halliburton, or him but obviously, AK and his scouts have a better grasp on this stuff than any of us could.
ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.
Re: The Chicago Bulls select forward Patrick Williams #4 overall.
-
- Senior
- Posts: 539
- And1: 176
- Joined: Jul 16, 2006
- Location: Under Pax's Stairs
Re: The Chicago Bulls select forward Patrick Williams #4 overall.
fleet wrote:PaKii94 wrote:Evil_Headband wrote:
I suspect no matter which player was selected at 4, "most people" would have preferred to trade down and "most people" would have preferred they take someone else.
Of course, that doesn't make the answers right or wrong, just something that I think is interesting to consider.
I was #1 in the trade down camp! I'm just saying there is no guarantees there WAS any good trade down options. Obviously AK didn't think so. The detroit trade down WASN'T an option for us.
The great thing about Detroit trading up to 3 or 4, is that after they trade up, they would then have to trade down. Because you’re supposed to trade down.
This should be the post to end all post regarding this subject... wouldn't Detroit be doing the exact same thing you're accusing the Bulls getting wrong

Re: The Chicago Bulls select forward Patrick Williams #4 overall.
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,550
- And1: 1,893
- Joined: Apr 08, 2012
-
Re: The Chicago Bulls select forward Patrick Williams #4 overall.
HomoSapien wrote:The Spurs wanting him has to make everyone feel a little more optimistic about this. If you believe that Williams is the guy (and as Dinwiddie said, has no ceiling) then you're better off just taking him and not risking losing him by trading down. In my mind, you couldn't really have gone wrong with Deni, Halliburton, or him but obviously, AK and his scouts have a better grasp on this stuff than any of us could.
That’s the way I feel as well. The Spurs wanting Pat Will makes me think if they see a “Kawhi-type” player in him. A player who’s a humble hard-worker with elite athleticism and many physical tools & skills, but raw.
I have faith with the new staff, otherwise if it was the old regime, I wouldn’t be that much confident in player development.
Re: The Chicago Bulls select forward Patrick Williams #4 overall.
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,817
- And1: 9,102
- Joined: Aug 11, 2001
Re: The Chicago Bulls select forward Patrick Williams #4 overall.
fleet wrote:lol, word gets out. The Spurs were sitting on this guy for months hoping nobody noticed him.
This guy wasn't an unknown. He was a fairly high profile recruit and had a better freshman season than his lottery drafted teammate (Vassell). The Warriors front office (I'm a GS fan) had him as a trade down target months before the draft.
Vassell was seen as the more polished, ready made player because he was a year older. Williams was seen as a bigger, stronger Vassell with more upside. He was just "greener" than Vassell by 1 year. In a relatively weak draft with lots of questions marks about even the highest rated prospects, he was boosted by his upside.
No doubt a lot of front offices figured that he's basically a higher upside version of Vassell minus a year of development in college.
Brian Geltzeiler: You see Mark Jackson getting a head coaching job as early as next year?
Adrian Wojnarowski: Not if people make calls on him. Not if an organization is doing their homework and knows all the things he brings with him.
Adrian Wojnarowski: Not if people make calls on him. Not if an organization is doing their homework and knows all the things he brings with him.
Re: The Chicago Bulls select forward Patrick Williams #4 overall.
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,550
- And1: 1,893
- Joined: Apr 08, 2012
-
Re: The Chicago Bulls select forward Patrick Williams #4 overall.
fleet wrote:PaKii94 wrote:Evil_Headband wrote:
I suspect no matter which player was selected at 4, "most people" would have preferred to trade down and "most people" would have preferred they take someone else.
Of course, that doesn't make the answers right or wrong, just something that I think is interesting to consider.
I was #1 in the trade down camp! I'm just saying there is no guarantees there WAS any good trade down options. Obviously AK didn't think so. The detroit trade down WASN'T an option for us.
The great thing about Detroit trading up to 3 or 4, is that after they trade up, they would then have to trade down. Because you’re supposed to trade down.
I was skeptical with the pick at first because I didn’t know much about Pat Will. But if he is in fact AKME Top 3 or even #1 ranked prospect you don’t risk trading down just to get an extra pick, especially when you know teams are after Pat Will. Regardless if mock drafts have him ranked lower than the 4th pick, as long as you know you did your homework, trust your gut.
Re: The Chicago Bulls select forward Patrick Williams #4 overall.
-
- Senior Mod - Bulls
- Posts: 70,034
- And1: 37,323
- Joined: Dec 23, 2002
-
Re: The Chicago Bulls select forward Patrick Williams #4 overall.
JimmyButler21 wrote:
On number 9, gotta say, too soon. And Lu is another guy that should be in the organization.
Re: The Chicago Bulls select forward Patrick Williams #4 overall.
-
- Senior Mod - Bulls
- Posts: 70,034
- And1: 37,323
- Joined: Dec 23, 2002
-
Re: The Chicago Bulls select forward Patrick Williams #4 overall.
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,068
- And1: 1,245
- Joined: Dec 12, 2011
- Location: Charlottesville
- Contact:
-
Re: The Chicago Bulls select forward Patrick Williams #4 overall.
fleet wrote:JimmyButler21 wrote:
On number 9, gotta say, too soon. And Lu is another guy that should be in the organization.
Blakeney wore 9 if that matters...
This is not a moment, it's a movement
Re: The Chicago Bulls select forward Patrick Williams #4 overall.
- HomoSapien
- Senior Mod - Bulls
- Posts: 37,330
- And1: 30,367
- Joined: Aug 17, 2009
-
Re: The Chicago Bulls select forward Patrick Williams #4 overall.
D_GoLow wrote:fleet wrote:JimmyButler21 wrote:
On number 9, gotta say, too soon. And Lu is another guy that should be in the organization.
Blakeney wore 9 if that matters...
#9 will alway be Ron Harper's number to me.
ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.
Re: The Chicago Bulls select forward Patrick Williams #4 overall.
-
- Senior Mod - Bulls
- Posts: 70,034
- And1: 37,323
- Joined: Dec 23, 2002
-
Re: The Chicago Bulls select forward Patrick Williams #4 overall.
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,230
- And1: 1,224
- Joined: Feb 17, 2010
Re: The Chicago Bulls select forward Patrick Williams #4 overall.
HomoSapien wrote:
#9 will alway be Ron Harper's number to me.
This, I didn't even remember Lu wearing it until people here pointed it out, it's always been Ron.
Re: The Chicago Bulls select forward Patrick Williams #4 overall.
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,551
- And1: 532
- Joined: Jan 07, 2017
-
Re: The Chicago Bulls select forward Patrick Williams #4 overall.
The Force. wrote:I get being excited but I would lower my expectations significantly if I were you. The most likely outcome is that he becomes a solid 3D role player with good rim protection. That's nothing to sneeze at but obviously not a star.Butler4thewin wrote:p will has me excited i cant shake the feeling the kid is going to be a atar
Better to set expectations low and be pleasantly surprised.
Sent from my SM-G960U using RealGM mobile app
no man this kid gives the feeling of a superstar type player to me i think we make the playoffs this year with this staff and coach this team is loaded with some significant talent and williams will make the pistons fan cry like when we missed out on wade by one pick
Re: The Chicago Bulls select forward Patrick Williams #4 overall.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,497
- And1: 6,421
- Joined: Jul 11, 2001
- Location: Yelzenbah!
-
Re: The Chicago Bulls select forward Patrick Williams #4 overall.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,447
- And1: 9,105
- Joined: Aug 10, 2004
Re: The Chicago Bulls select forward Patrick Williams #4 overall.
Butler4thewin wrote:The Force. wrote:I get being excited but I would lower my expectations significantly if I were you. The most likely outcome is that he becomes a solid 3D role player with good rim protection. That's nothing to sneeze at but obviously not a star.Butler4thewin wrote:p will has me excited i cant shake the feeling the kid is going to be a atar
Better to set expectations low and be pleasantly surprised.
Sent from my SM-G960U using RealGM mobile app
no man this kid gives the feeling of a superstar type player to me i think we make the playoffs this year with this staff and coach this team is loaded with some significant talent and williams will make the pistons fan cry like when we missed out on wade by one pick
Get it bro! We haven’t had anything to be excited about in years.
Re: The Chicago Bulls select forward Patrick Williams #4 overall.
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,068
- And1: 1,245
- Joined: Dec 12, 2011
- Location: Charlottesville
- Contact:
-
Re: The Chicago Bulls select forward Patrick Williams #4 overall.
This is not a moment, it's a movement
Re: The Chicago Bulls select forward Patrick Williams #4 overall.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,497
- And1: 6,421
- Joined: Jul 11, 2001
- Location: Yelzenbah!
-
Re: The Chicago Bulls select forward Patrick Williams #4 overall.
D_GoLow wrote:Indomitable wrote:fleet wrote:
Harper 3 rings
1. Playoff Rondo
2. Deng
3. Harp
Rondo is not even in the discussion. It was a cup of coffee.

Re: The Chicago Bulls select forward Patrick Williams #4 overall.
- JohnnyTapwater
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,194
- And1: 1,639
- Joined: Nov 06, 2009
- Location: Chicago
-
Re: The Chicago Bulls select forward Patrick Williams #4 overall.
I want Pat to go with the full beard for that Coby White synergy.
Re: The Chicago Bulls select forward Patrick Williams #4 overall.
- dougthonus
- Senior Mod - Bulls
- Posts: 58,837
- And1: 18,904
- Joined: Dec 22, 2004
- Contact:
-
Re: The Chicago Bulls select forward Patrick Williams #4 overall.
Bankshot wrote:This should be the post to end all post regarding this subject... wouldn't Detroit be doing the exact same thing you're accusing the Bulls getting wrong
Yes, but Detroit may have been willing to do it and we weren't and my preference would be to let Detroit do the thing I didn't want rather than the Bulls.
Re: The Chicago Bulls select forward Patrick Williams #4 overall.
- Benedict Miller
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,656
- And1: 2,082
- Joined: Mar 11, 2002
- Location: FLY St.
-
Re: The Chicago Bulls select forward Patrick Williams #4 overall.
Patrick needs to assert himself much better and become more aggressive in real games. Seems to settle rather than take advantage of situations.
Re: The Chicago Bulls select forward Patrick Williams #4 overall.
-
- Senior
- Posts: 696
- And1: 225
- Joined: Jun 23, 2017
-
Re: The Chicago Bulls select forward Patrick Williams #4 overall.
About all the Trade down talk.
If your Player is available at your spot you go and take him. You trade down if
- you like 4 Players and can be sure to get 1 of them
- the returned value is 100% better than the value you give up
- there is no Player available at your spot you like
You don't Risk losing your guy for being greedy, you take him and call it a day.
If your Player is available at your spot you go and take him. You trade down if
- you like 4 Players and can be sure to get 1 of them
- the returned value is 100% better than the value you give up
- there is no Player available at your spot you like
You don't Risk losing your guy for being greedy, you take him and call it a day.