ImageImageImage

How to fix the "bigs" problems now?

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

old school 34
Senior
Posts: 645
And1: 240
Joined: Jun 14, 2018
         

Re: How to fix the 

Post#361 » by old school 34 » Thu Nov 26, 2020 6:06 pm

KGdaBom wrote:
Krapinsky wrote:The facts that we made a big push for Derrick Jones Jr (I assume instead of resigning Juancho), gives me comfort in the fact that the front office probably isn't satisfied with the current roster make up and recognizes we have a huge need for someone capable of guarding larger wings / skilled PFs.

I'd rather have Juancho.
I saw the DJJ article and our apparent interest....which is encouraging that we were looking for potentially another bigger wing option yet. And obviously the simplest path would've been thru mid level...maybe, could've been S&T as well...would be really interesting to see what that butterfly effect would've turned out looking like? Think I'd want to see what that end roster looks like before I automatically sweat..that we lost out?

And that's what I appreciate with this FO...compared to some in past....in seems like we've played Options A, B, & C so much farther down the road than others besides having options D,E, & F...where fair or not past guys didn't have a plan past maybe B?

Sent from my SM-G973U using RealGM mobile app
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,605
And1: 5,113
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: How to fix the "bigs" problems now? 

Post#362 » by minimus » Thu Nov 26, 2020 6:08 pm

PerkinsFor3 wrote:
minimus wrote:

Jrue is an underrated defender. Really strong, has quick hands. If Okogie, Culver or even Edwards learn how to use their strength and wingspan to defend bigger opponents without fouling I have no problems with playing them at PF. Let say Okogie shoots a respectable 36% from 3pt point and grabs enough rebounds. One big advantage he would bring is that he can switch in defense and guard any perimeter player simultaneously.


That's a 10% jump for Okogie.


Yes, 10%. I wonder shooting mostly spotup 3s from corners will help.
old school 34
Senior
Posts: 645
And1: 240
Joined: Jun 14, 2018
         

Re: How to fix the "bigs" problems now? 

Post#363 » by old school 34 » Thu Nov 26, 2020 6:20 pm

Dream home run swing...

Culver & rights to Bolmaro & McDaniels for John Collins (never paid so close to Hawks tea leaves before...lol).

JC needs to get paid & that's what might create our opportunity...might be slight overpay...with assets & contract (another guy that needs to get better defensively but adds length & athleticism)....he's a better screen setter than KAT....they said with DLo & Rubio 48 minutes of elite playmaker on the court...same then for elite pick/pop/roller with JC/KAT.

Probably means we need to shave roughly 15 mil next year there abouts to stay under lux? Beasley starts & plays like last year....Antman develops & replaces him as starter...Nowell becomes our bench/rotation dead-eye shooter. Beasley to NY for expirings & Dal 1st next year...think that keeps us under & we progress...still lots of ifs but there's a reasonable path.

Sent from my SM-G973U using RealGM mobile app
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,845
And1: 22,429
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: How to fix the 

Post#364 » by Klomp » Mon Nov 30, 2020 12:17 pm

tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
User avatar
Dual
Veteran
Posts: 2,682
And1: 1,494
Joined: Jun 26, 2009
 

Re: How to fix the 

Post#365 » by Dual » Mon Nov 30, 2020 1:15 pm

Klomp wrote:

Wow, I like him a lot, watching this highlights. How is his defense?
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,845
And1: 22,429
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: How to fix the 

Post#366 » by Klomp » Mon Nov 30, 2020 1:22 pm

Dual wrote:Wow, I like him a lot, watching this highlights. How is his defense?

It's fine. He'll never appear on an all-defense team, but he doesn't hurt the team.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 22,683
And1: 6,144
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: How to fix the 

Post#367 » by KGdaBom » Mon Nov 30, 2020 1:30 pm

Klomp wrote:
Dual wrote:Wow, I like him a lot, watching this highlights. How is his defense?

It's fine. He'll never appear on an all-defense team, but he doesn't hurt the team.

Is he an SF or a PF or those positions don't exist because we play 1-3-1
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,845
And1: 22,429
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: How to fix the 

Post#368 » by Klomp » Mon Nov 30, 2020 1:32 pm

KGdaBom wrote:
Klomp wrote:
Dual wrote:Wow, I like him a lot, watching this highlights. How is his defense?

It's fine. He'll never appear on an all-defense team, but he doesn't hurt the team.

Is he an SF or a PF or those positions don't exist because we play 1-3-1

He can play any of the three wing spots
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 22,683
And1: 6,144
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: How to fix the 

Post#369 » by KGdaBom » Mon Nov 30, 2020 1:39 pm

Klomp wrote:
KGdaBom wrote:
Klomp wrote:It's fine. He'll never appear on an all-defense team, but he doesn't hurt the team.

Is he an SF or a PF or those positions don't exist because we play 1-3-1

He can play any of the three wing spots

I'm being a little sarcastic. I don't see him as an SG. He has a streaky, but decent 3 point stroke. Huge bounce for shot blocking and going to the rim on drives or for Alley Oops. I believe all the doom and gloom over our "Bigs" particularly the PF or Big Wing position is going to prove no big deal. Could we get better? Sure, but I'm fine with what we got.
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,605
And1: 5,113
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: How to fix the 

Post#370 » by minimus » Mon Nov 30, 2020 8:24 pm



We need someone who tries to dunk every single time he gets the ball
jpatrick
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,731
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 30, 2007
 

Re: How to fix the 

Post#371 » by jpatrick » Mon Nov 30, 2020 8:31 pm

Krapinsky wrote:The facts that we made a big push for Derrick Jones Jr (I assume instead of resigning Juancho), gives me comfort in the fact that the front office probably isn't satisfied with the current roster make up and recognizes we have a huge need for someone capable of guarding larger wings / skilled PFs.


Sounds like it wasn’t just Jones. Rosas went after numerous forwards. Jones, Milsap, Crowder, and Green in free agency. And Gordon, Nance, and Tucker via trade. At least per Jon K.

I think that’s the type of player we need. A rugged, defensive combo forward that can defend on the perimeter and shoot at least a little.
TheZachAttack
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,764
And1: 1,325
Joined: Jul 23, 2014
       

Re: How to fix the 

Post#372 » by TheZachAttack » Mon Nov 30, 2020 9:00 pm

KGdaBom wrote:
Klomp wrote:
KGdaBom wrote:Is he an SF or a PF or those positions don't exist because we play 1-3-1

He can play any of the three wing spots

I'm being a little sarcastic. I don't see him as an SG. He has a streaky, but decent 3 point stroke. Huge bounce for shot blocking and going to the rim on drives or for Alley Oops. I believe all the doom and gloom over our "Bigs" particularly the PF or Big Wing position is going to prove no big deal. Could we get better? Sure, but I'm fine with what we got.


I think the main point is that traditionally positions were decided based on defensive assignment and the way that Rosas describes it is based on offensive assignment. Effectively, there isn't going to be much difference in offensive role between all of the "wings" in the majority of the Wolves main offensive rotations--especially when we play 5-out.

It's mainly going to be action from KAT (big)/D Lo (ball-handler) at and near the top of the break with wings running around spacing the floor and cutting around those two. That's why mobility, speed, and spacing is important in Rosasian lineups because that's the type of scheme they want to run--whether you agree or disagree with that being the optimal lineup construction.

On defense, KAT will be guarding the rim (big) and D Lo and the wings will be switching around the perimeter... again other than the person guarding the ball-handler (maybe D lo maybe not) at the point of attack... it's really distinctionless on what those other 3 wings are doing because they are all going to be asked to guard on the perimeter and chip in on the defensive glass--again maybe not your preferred scheme...but again really irrelevant for having a conversation about what Wolves lineups will look like because it's what they want to do.
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 22,683
And1: 6,144
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: How to fix the 

Post#373 » by KGdaBom » Mon Nov 30, 2020 9:15 pm

TheZachAttack wrote:
KGdaBom wrote:
Klomp wrote:He can play any of the three wing spots

I'm being a little sarcastic. I don't see him as an SG. He has a streaky, but decent 3 point stroke. Huge bounce for shot blocking and going to the rim on drives or for Alley Oops. I believe all the doom and gloom over our "Bigs" particularly the PF or Big Wing position is going to prove no big deal. Could we get better? Sure, but I'm fine with what we got.


I think the main point is that traditionally positions were decided based on defensive assignment and the way that Rosas describes it is based on offensive assignment. Effectively, there isn't going to be much difference in offensive role between all of the "wings" in the majority of the Wolves main offensive rotations--especially when we play 5-out.

It's mainly going to be action from KAT (big)/D Lo (ball-handler) at and near the top of the break with wings running around spacing the floor and cutting around those two. That's why mobility, speed, and spacing is important in Rosasian lineups because that's the type of scheme they want to run--whether you agree or disagree with that being the optimal lineup construction.

On defense, KAT will be guarding the rim (big) and D Lo and the wings will be switching around the perimeter... again other than the person guarding the ball-handler (maybe D lo maybe not) at the point of attack... it's really distinctionless on what those other 3 wings are doing because they are all going to be asked to guard on the perimeter and chip in on the defensive glass--again maybe not your preferred scheme...but again really irrelevant for having a conversation about what Wolves lineups will look like because it's what they want to do.

I'd rather take my chances on the opposing perimeter shooting than play matador as they drive the rim and destroy us on the boards. There should be some sort of balance between the two.
User avatar
King Malta
Starter
Posts: 2,328
And1: 1,554
Joined: Jun 24, 2013
Location: The Lottery
         

Re: How to fix the 

Post#374 » by King Malta » Tue Dec 1, 2020 2:32 am

Read on Twitter
Jedzz
RealGM
Posts: 12,322
And1: 2,506
Joined: Oct 05, 2018

Re: How to fix the 

Post#375 » by Jedzz » Tue Dec 1, 2020 7:14 am

Dual wrote:
Klomp wrote:

Wow, I like him a lot, watching this highlights. How is his defense?


His on/off court number show the opponent scores less and converts possessions less when he's playing. Whether that's him adding better team or individual defense I don't know. But in early season and then again late season last year the team won more with him and otherwise seemed to compete at a higher level when he was playing.

The only possible big problem with him appears to be staying on the court healthy, or what he considers healthy enough to play. Which could be a big issue.
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 22,683
And1: 6,144
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: How to fix the 

Post#376 » by KGdaBom » Tue Dec 1, 2020 10:13 am

Jedzz wrote:
Dual wrote:
Klomp wrote:

Wow, I like him a lot, watching this highlights. How is his defense?


His on/off court number show the opponent scores less and converts possessions less when he's playing. Whether that's him adding better team or individual defense I don't know. But in early season and then again late season last year the team won more with him and otherwise seemed to compete at a higher level when he was playing.

The only possible big problem with him appears to be staying on the court healthy, or what he considers healthy enough to play. Which could be a big issue.

I don't believe the time missed from Layman last year was a question of toughness. It very likely was the team at that point just saying what's the point of playing him now. Extra cautiousness of Wolves Management. Possibly tanking.
Jedzz
RealGM
Posts: 12,322
And1: 2,506
Joined: Oct 05, 2018

Re: How to fix the 

Post#377 » by Jedzz » Tue Dec 1, 2020 5:23 pm

KGdaBom wrote:
Jedzz wrote:
Dual wrote:Wow, I like him a lot, watching this highlights. How is his defense?


His on/off court number show the opponent scores less and converts possessions less when he's playing. Whether that's him adding better team or individual defense I don't know. But in early season and then again late season last year the team won more with him and otherwise seemed to compete at a higher level when he was playing.

The only possible big problem with him appears to be staying on the court healthy, or what he considers healthy enough to play. Which could be a big issue.

I don't believe the time missed from Layman last year was a question of toughness. It very likely was the team at that point just saying what's the point of playing him now. Extra cautiousness of Wolves Management. Possibly tanking.


maybe. See the desire to win and compete thread.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,845
And1: 22,429
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: How to fix the 

Post#378 » by Klomp » Sun Dec 6, 2020 5:50 pm

I doubt it would happen, but if we keep adding enough connections for him maybe Nikola Mirotic would want to return to the NBA?

Has played with Rubio, Hernangomez and now Bolmaro. Would only be 30 at the start of next season.

tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Note30
Head Coach
Posts: 6,170
And1: 1,898
Joined: Feb 25, 2014
 

Re: How to fix the 

Post#379 » by Note30 » Sun Dec 6, 2020 5:57 pm

Klomp wrote:I doubt it would happen, but if we keep adding enough connections for him maybe Nikola Mirotic would want to return to the NBA?

Has played with Rubio, Hernangomez and now Bolmaro. Would only be 30 at the start of next season.



Didn't he leave cause he couldn't keep up?
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 22,683
And1: 6,144
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: How to fix the 

Post#380 » by KGdaBom » Sun Dec 6, 2020 6:22 pm

Note30 wrote:
Klomp wrote:I doubt it would happen, but if we keep adding enough connections for him maybe Nikola Mirotic would want to return to the NBA?

Has played with Rubio, Hernangomez and now Bolmaro. Would only be 30 at the start of next season.



Didn't he leave cause he couldn't keep up?

Last thing I remember about him is he was good.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves