Tim Lehrbach wrote:How many teams have an MLE or larger amount of money left to spend? If Houston was this desperate to dump Westbrook and he was this insistent on getting out of Houston, why not just agree to a buyout and waive him? Seems likely he could have landed an MLE-sized or greater contract for the next two or three years, so why not agree to chop, say, $15-20 million off the contract? That's potentially huge savings (which could either be pocketed or spent on healthy players) vs. paying Wall. Westbrook gets his choice of suitors. Just a thought, and maybe not a smart one.
(To preempt: I guess I know the answer. Dead money is dreaded, so even under the scenario that Wall never plays again, he's at least potentially moveable, while a waived Westbrook is stuck on the payroll. I'm just wondering whether, for a team that either needs healthy players to try to win with Harden, or is blowing it up and might as well save money, trading for Wall will actually work out better than waiving Westbrook.)
Buying out a contract of $131 million? Even if RW took $100 million stretched over 5 years is $20 million a year in dead money. It's a massive handicap.
I would have been reluctant to take Wall for only 1 #1. But a happy Wall is better than an unhappy Westbrook. And if Wall and Harden are friends it makes sense to appease Harden.
I'd says the Rocket should look at who's left in FA and see if there's anyone who can be gotten for a Vet minimum contract who might help them. Their chances of beating the Lakers or Clippers is slim, but you never know who might get hurt.