ImageImageImageImageImage

Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIX

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

smoothSeph
Rookie
Posts: 1,040
And1: 689
Joined: May 15, 2019
     

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIX 

Post#901 » by smoothSeph » Thu Dec 17, 2020 4:23 pm

Frichuela wrote:
smoothSeph wrote:
nate33 wrote:They can have Brook Lopez or Ish Smith for him, but nothing else. Not even a 2nd round pick.

I could see an Ish/Tucker swap happening. The Rockets just lost Chris Clemons to a torn Achilles leaving them without a backup PG for Wall.


Problem is the Rockets would like more value in return...either a juicy second rounder (our 2022 Chi/Det/LA most favorable 2nd round pick) and/or a promising young player (and I fear that could be Bonga or Troy).

To me that's too much to give for a 1-year rental on a 35 year old.

Do we think it’d be a 1 year rental though? If Tucker wants to play with Russ I could see him finishing his career here. Question is if he’ll be on the decline soon, like you said he’s already 35.
Frichuela
Head Coach
Posts: 6,253
And1: 4,120
Joined: Feb 25, 2015
 

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIX 

Post#902 » by Frichuela » Thu Dec 17, 2020 4:38 pm

smoothSeph wrote:
Frichuela wrote:
smoothSeph wrote:I could see an Ish/Tucker swap happening. The Rockets just lost Chris Clemons to a torn Achilles leaving them without a backup PG for Wall.


Problem is the Rockets would like more value in return...either a juicy second rounder (our 2022 Chi/Det/LA most favorable 2nd round pick) and/or a promising young player (and I fear that could be Bonga or Troy).

To me that's too much to give for a 1-year rental on a 35 year old.

Do we think it’d be a 1 year rental though? If Tucker wants to play with Russ I could see him finishing his career here. Question is if he’ll be on the decline soon, like you said he’s already 35.


Ditto...how helpful can a 36-year old defensive-minded player be?
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,485
And1: 8,408
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIX 

Post#903 » by Dat2U » Thu Dec 17, 2020 5:38 pm

Tucker for I. Smith would be good. As long as Brooks doesn't overplay him.
User avatar
TGW
RealGM
Posts: 13,649
And1: 7,053
Joined: Oct 22, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIX 

Post#904 » by TGW » Thu Dec 17, 2020 5:57 pm

Can't imagine a worse frontcourt than Bonga/Tucker/Lopez lol
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,485
And1: 8,408
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIX 

Post#905 » by Dat2U » Thu Dec 17, 2020 7:11 pm

TGW wrote:Can't imagine a worse frontcourt than Bonga/Tucker/Lopez lol


Oh God I hope we don't see that but Tucker's ability to defend multiple positions at a high level is helpful. Bertans/Tucker together at F would be a nice balance of shooting and defense.
User avatar
Dark Faze
Head Coach
Posts: 6,625
And1: 2,228
Joined: Dec 27, 2008

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIX 

Post#906 » by Dark Faze » Thu Dec 17, 2020 7:28 pm

There's really no minutes at the 4 for Tucker unless you want him to play backup C.
DCZards
RealGM
Posts: 11,588
And1: 5,370
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Location: The Streets of DC
     

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIX 

Post#907 » by DCZards » Thu Dec 17, 2020 7:32 pm

Frichuela wrote:
smoothSeph wrote:
Frichuela wrote:
Problem is the Rockets would like more value in return...either a juicy second rounder (our 2022 Chi/Det/LA most favorable 2nd round pick) and/or a promising young player (and I fear that could be Bonga or Troy).

To me that's too much to give for a 1-year rental on a 35 year old.

Do we think it’d be a 1 year rental though? If Tucker wants to play with Russ I could see him finishing his career here. Question is if he’ll be on the decline soon, like you said he’s already 35.


Ditto...how helpful can a 36-year old defensive-minded player be?

Very helpful to a team that ranked dead last in defense last season.

I’d do an Ish for Tucker trade. PJ is the kind of grown a** man this team needs in the front court.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 26,491
And1: 10,169
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIX 

Post#908 » by payitforward » Thu Dec 17, 2020 7:38 pm

Frichuela wrote:
smoothSeph wrote:
nate33 wrote:They can have Brook Lopez or Ish Smith for him, but nothing else. Not even a 2nd round pick.

I could see an Ish/Tucker swap happening. The Rockets just lost Chris Clemons to a torn Achilles leaving them without a backup PG for Wall.


Problem is the Rockets would like more value in return...either a juicy second rounder (our 2022 Chi/Det/LA most favorable 2nd round pick) and/or a promising young player (and I fear that could be Bonga or Troy).

To me that's too much to give for a 1-year rental on a 35 year old.

Agreed. That would be a waste of assets. I haven't been much of a Jerome Robinson fan, but I wouldn't even give him for Tucker!

Plus it would have to be a player rather than a pick, as we have 15 guys guaranteed already; we can't add someone.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 26,491
And1: 10,169
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIX 

Post#909 » by payitforward » Thu Dec 17, 2020 7:47 pm

DCZards wrote:
Frichuela wrote:
smoothSeph wrote:Do we think it’d be a 1 year rental though? If Tucker wants to play with Russ I could see him finishing his career here. Question is if he’ll be on the decline soon, like you said he’s already 35.

Ditto...how helpful can a 36-year old defensive-minded player be?

Very helpful to a team that ranked dead last in defense last season.

I’d do an Ish for Tucker trade. PJ is the kind of grown a** man this team needs in the front court.

Unfortunately, he's a "grown-old a** man." He hasn't had a good season since 2016-17.

Even for Ish -- expiring, like Tucker -- I would have to get some kind of a forward-facing asset. Even a round 2 pick might do.

Trading Ish for a pick would also open up a roster spot -- e.g. for Mathews.

Of course, this is predicated on the performance by Raul Neto the other night!
DCZards
RealGM
Posts: 11,588
And1: 5,370
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Location: The Streets of DC
     

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIX 

Post#910 » by DCZards » Fri Dec 18, 2020 3:04 am

payitforward wrote:
DCZards wrote:
Frichuela wrote:Ditto...how helpful can a 36-year old defensive-minded player be?

Very helpful to a team that ranked dead last in defense last season.

I’d do an Ish for Tucker trade. PJ is the kind of grown a** man this team needs in the front court.

Unfortunately, he's a "grown-old a** man." He hasn't had a good season since 2016-17.

That’s only if you judge PJ’s contributions on numbers alone.
User avatar
long suffrin' boulez fan
General Manager
Posts: 8,022
And1: 3,784
Joined: Nov 18, 2005
Location: Just above Ted's double bottom line
         

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIX 

Post#911 » by long suffrin' boulez fan » Fri Dec 18, 2020 3:58 am

I’m resigned to the fact that it doesn’t matter who we trade for. We’ll never win diddly with Brooks as our “coach.”
There are only two tragedies in life: one is not getting what one wants, and the other is getting it
User avatar
long suffrin' boulez fan
General Manager
Posts: 8,022
And1: 3,784
Joined: Nov 18, 2005
Location: Just above Ted's double bottom line
         

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIX 

Post#912 » by long suffrin' boulez fan » Fri Dec 18, 2020 1:20 pm

Beal for Harden?

Who’s down with that?
There are only two tragedies in life: one is not getting what one wants, and the other is getting it
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 26,491
And1: 10,169
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIX 

Post#913 » by payitforward » Fri Dec 18, 2020 2:38 pm

DCZards wrote:
payitforward wrote:
DCZards wrote:Very helpful to a team that ranked dead last in defense last season.

I’d do an Ish for Tucker trade. PJ is the kind of grown a** man this team needs in the front court.

Unfortunately, he's a "grown-old a** man." He hasn't had a good season since 2016-17.

That’s only if you judge PJ’s contributions on numbers alone.

Fair enough. You may have watched a lot of Houston games. Or Phoenix games. I haven't.

So, I went back & took another look at the numbers, &... I was mistaken! :) His game hasn't deteriorated to speak of.

If having P.J. here meant we wouldn't have to watch games like last night's vs. Detroit... bring him in. Please bring him in.
AFM
RealGM
Posts: 13,295
And1: 9,749
Joined: May 25, 2012
   

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIX 

Post#914 » by AFM » Sat Dec 19, 2020 3:13 am

PIF calling anyone "old" is ridiculous.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 73,378
And1: 25,939
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIX 

Post#915 » by nate33 » Sat Dec 19, 2020 3:54 am

long suffrin' boulez fan wrote:Beal for Harden?

Who’s down with that?

Not Westbrook.
User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,842
And1: 2,072
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIX 

Post#916 » by gambitx777 » Sat Dec 19, 2020 8:50 am

Mo and robinson and maybe a second for bamba

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using RealGM mobile app
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 26,491
And1: 10,169
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIX 

Post#917 » by payitforward » Sat Dec 19, 2020 3:46 pm

AFM wrote:PIF calling anyone "old" is ridiculous.

It's simple -- if they're not young enough to be my grandkids, they're old.
bsilver
Rookie
Posts: 1,200
And1: 690
Joined: Aug 09, 2005
Location: New Haven, CT

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIX 

Post#918 » by bsilver » Sat Dec 19, 2020 4:09 pm

Despite Ish Smith’s horrible performance the other night, he did play well last year, and should have some value.

Neto has played well, and we do have Winston, so Smith could be considered expendable.

Houston is desperate for PG depth, and would like Smith unless someone better is available. But Houston doesn’t really have anyone we need or that Houston would give up.

So, the best trade is Smith to Houston, for nothing ( a 2nd round pick would be nice, but Houston wouldn’t think so). We need the roster spot. This trade is unlikely, but we could help facilitate a Harden trade to third team.
There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics — quote popularized by Mark Twain.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 26,491
And1: 10,169
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIX 

Post#919 » by payitforward » Sat Dec 19, 2020 5:19 pm

bsilver wrote:Despite Ish Smith’s horrible performance the other night, he did play well last year, and should have some value.

Neto has played well, and we do have Winston, so Smith could be considered expendable.

Houston is desperate for PG depth, and would like Smith unless someone better is available. But Houston doesn’t really have anyone we need or that Houston would give up.

So, the best trade is Smith to Houston, for nothing ( a 2nd round pick would be nice, but Houston wouldn’t think so). We need the roster spot. This trade is unlikely, but we could help facilitate a Harden trade to third team.

I can easily imagine getting a R2 pick for Smith -- maybe a couple of years out. Except, unfortunately, Houston doesn't have any to give for quite a while.

Maybe in a multi-team move involving Harden?
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 73,378
And1: 25,939
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIX 

Post#920 » by nate33 » Sat Dec 19, 2020 5:47 pm

bsilver wrote:Despite Ish Smith’s horrible performance the other night, he did play well last year, and should have some value.

Neto has played well, and we do have Winston, so Smith could be considered expendable.

Houston is desperate for PG depth, and would like Smith unless someone better is available. But Houston doesn’t really have anyone we need or that Houston would give up.

So, the best trade is Smith to Houston, for nothing ( a 2nd round pick would be nice, but Houston wouldn’t think so). We need the roster spot. This trade is unlikely, but we could help facilitate a Harden trade to third team.

I don't see the value in dumping Smith just for the roster spot. Surely, Smith is better than anyone we would pick up off of waivers. If there's a guy we like a lot, then dump AP and add him.

I'm not saying Smith is untradeable. I'm just saying Smith has value as an actual, rotation-worthy, NBA player. Why squander that?

Return to Washington Wizards