MickeyDavis wrote:It will be interesting to see if there are any roster tweaks before the opener.
Don't think anything happens. We need to shed salary to make a move so it really would have to be two moves.
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
MickeyDavis wrote:It will be interesting to see if there are any roster tweaks before the opener.
GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:thonnisbeastley wrote:GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:the board has generaIIy made cIear that good shooters are consistentIy good shooters.... Iike they dont ever want guys to shoot under Ieague average for a month or something because thats inconsistent bad shooting. see guys Iike beaI and booker dont ever have months Iike that..... weII actuaIIy they do but they pIay for other teams and we dont watch them every night so you can cIaim they are good consistent shooters to make a point about what we dont have enough of. i know its confusing but this is how it works
I like how everyone of your comments lately has randomly included jabs at both Beal and Booker. Never seen someone get so upset about Middleton comparisons.
considering moving middIeton.... to "improve the team" for a true baIIer/shooter Iike beaI and booker even guys Ike bojan.....is the most common grand idea on the board.... am i not abIe to mock my utter disdain of of what i beIieve to be these horribIe ideas constantIy in return? ive been pretty consistent advocating keeping ddv instead of Iesser chuckers as weII. if consistentcy is your thing then im your man
thonnisbeastley wrote:GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:thonnisbeastley wrote:I like how everyone of your comments lately has randomly included jabs at both Beal and Booker. Never seen someone get so upset about Middleton comparisons.
considering moving middIeton.... to "improve the team" for a true baIIer/shooter Iike beaI and booker even guys Ike bojan.....is the most common grand idea on the board.... am i not abIe to mock my utter disdain of of what i beIieve to be these horribIe ideas constantIy in return? ive been pretty consistent advocating keeping ddv instead of Iesser chuckers as weII. if consistentcy is your thing then im your man
No one was considering trading Middleton during that conversation, we were comparing value in trade scenarios. Saying Midds is closer to the value of Booker/Beal than Tatum/Butler. That was it. I wouldn't trade Midds for Beal or Booker, he fits our roster better than those two. But let it go already lol..
GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:thonnisbeastley wrote:GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:considering moving middIeton.... to "improve the team" for a true baIIer/shooter Iike beaI and booker even guys Ike bojan.....is the most common grand idea on the board.... am i not abIe to mock my utter disdain of of what i beIieve to be these horribIe ideas constantIy in return? ive been pretty consistent advocating keeping ddv instead of Iesser chuckers as weII. if consistentcy is your thing then im your man
No one was considering trading Middleton during that conversation, we were comparing value in trade scenarios. Saying Midds is closer to the value of Booker/Beal than Tatum/Butler. That was it. I wouldn't trade Midds for Beal or Booker, he fits our roster better than those two. But let it go already lol..
there is not any scenario whatsoever where either of those two guys come in where it wouIdnt be midIeton and middIeton aIone going out. you cant bring their names up without that obvious assumption. the comparison of those two both specificaIIy and as "a type" being an improvement over our current #2 is discussed so frequentIy its become nauseating to me
emunney wrote:DJ for Vanderbilt and Nowell.
emunney wrote:DJ for Vanderbilt and Nowell.
SKG wrote:They are trading khris next season for kawhi, sign and trade
emunney wrote:DJ for Vanderbilt and Nowell.
Badgerlander wrote:emunney wrote:DJ for Vanderbilt and Nowell.
There has to be a DJ+ for PJ Tucker trade out there
ShootingtheJ wrote:emunney wrote:DJ for Vanderbilt and Nowell.
Nowell is interesting, he had a really good preseason, but Vanderbilt still hasn't shown any signs of development. Wilson just finished the preseason with a PER of 24, at a position of desperate need. I think we hold on to him, and he gets his shot.
thonnisbeastley wrote:GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:thonnisbeastley wrote:I like how everyone of your comments lately has randomly included jabs at both Beal and Booker. Never seen someone get so upset about Middleton comparisons.
considering moving middIeton.... to "improve the team" for a true baIIer/shooter Iike beaI and booker even guys Ike bojan.....is the most common grand idea on the board.... am i not abIe to mock my utter disdain of of what i beIieve to be these horribIe ideas constantIy in return? ive been pretty consistent advocating keeping ddv instead of Iesser chuckers as weII. if consistentcy is your thing then im your man
No one was considering trading Middleton during that conversation, we were comparing value in trade scenarios. Saying Midds is closer to the value of Booker/Beal than Tatum/Butler. That was it. I wouldn't trade Midds for Beal or Booker, he fits our roster better than those two. But let it go already lol..
Matches Malone wrote:How did NBA fandom get to the point that it's more fun to thirst over players on other teams than to care more about your own team and players...
emunney wrote:ShootingtheJ wrote:emunney wrote:DJ for Vanderbilt and Nowell.
Nowell is interesting, he had a really good preseason, but Vanderbilt still hasn't shown any signs of development. Wilson just finished the preseason with a PER of 24, at a position of desperate need. I think we hold on to him, and he gets his shot.
Nowell's been a target of mine, was a top 5 G Leaguer last year despite being one of the youngest guys in the league. He's now fully buried in Minnesota and trading DJ for him would be like stealing a lottery pick.
ETA: Vanderbilt we could either keep to take a look at or cut and sign a FA big like Vonleh or Diallo or whomever.
Matches Malone wrote:How did NBA fandom get to the point that it's more fun to thirst over players on other teams than to care more about your own team and players...
DavidDunn21 wrote:Devin Booker had his back against the wall coming into the bubble and unleashed such a legendary stretch (IN THE SERVICE OF WINNING, 8-0, big shots against great teams, 31/6/5, 63%TS) that made people actually wonder if he's a #1. At any rate, now we can't move Khris for Booker. Everyone knows Booker is better than Khris now. The trick would've been making that move in advance.
A lot of you guys love to talk about what you perceive things to be in this precise moment with no eye at all to the future. You were so sure that Khris was slightly better than a bunch of 2nd and 3rd year players. Even though Bucks fans should know more than anyone else what Middleton is. Maybe we can still sell high on him.
Matches Malone wrote:How did NBA fandom get to the point that it's more fun to thirst over players on other teams than to care more about your own team and players...
giannis and 1 wrote:emunney wrote:ShootingtheJ wrote:
Nowell is interesting, he had a really good preseason, but Vanderbilt still hasn't shown any signs of development. Wilson just finished the preseason with a PER of 24, at a position of desperate need. I think we hold on to him, and he gets his shot.
Nowell's been a target of mine, was a top 5 G Leaguer last year despite being one of the youngest guys in the league. He's now fully buried in Minnesota and trading DJ for him would be like stealing a lottery pick.
ETA: Vanderbilt we could either keep to take a look at or cut and sign a FA big like Vonleh or Diallo or whomever.
Can Nowell shoot the 3